7i picture: question to the experts.

Jack D.

Veteran Member
Messages
2,738
Reaction score
790
Location
US
hi all:

can anybody explain to me what was wrong and why?

go there: http://www.arnason.no/modules.php?set_albumName=album10&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
and check last 2 pictures (0098 and 0099) of burger king at night.

both pictures were made last night at midnight. i was impressed by the colours, that's why i decided to take some shots.

passing this same place tonight i've noticed that something is wrong with my pictures. both have sign "burger king" shown in yellow or kind of orange colour when original colour is red and maches colour of the red strap above sign. why it has happenned?

just in case i give details of pictures: both were made from tripod from the same place at the same time (about 20 second one after another) with no flash light.
picture 98: exposure time 1/4 sec, f number 2.8 at fl 9.25 mm
picture 99: exposure time 1/6 sec, f number 3.5 at fl 17.81 mm

thanks in advance

jack
 
I'm guessing the sign is lit by a flourescent light - maybe using fluorescent WB would help?? Either that or the spectrum of the light (gas discharge) is very narrow and is perceived differently by the camera and the eye. But try it again with another WB setting and see what happens. I'd love to know.

Looks better in Yellow - quick tell Burger King!

Steve
hi all:

can anybody explain to me what was wrong and why?

go there:

http://www.arnason.no/modules.php?set_albumName=album10&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
and check last 2 pictures (0098 and 0099) of burger king at night.
both pictures were made last night at midnight. i was impressed by
the colours, that's why i decided to take some shots.
passing this same place tonight i've noticed that something is
wrong with my pictures. both have sign "burger king" shown in
yellow or kind of orange colour when original colour is red and
maches colour of the red strap above sign. why it has happenned?

just in case i give details of pictures: both were made from tripod
from the same place at the same time (about 20 second one after
another) with no flash light.
picture 98: exposure time 1/4 sec, f number 2.8 at fl 9.25 mm
picture 99: exposure time 1/6 sec, f number 3.5 at fl 17.81 mm

thanks in advance

jack
 
WB or exposure, the letters are transmitted, while the red is reflected light. Your eye compensates a lot, the camera doesn't.

Good Luck,

Pete
Looks better in Yellow - quick tell Burger King!

Steve
hi all:

can anybody explain to me what was wrong and why?

go there:

http://www.arnason.no/modules.php?set_albumName=album10&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
and check last 2 pictures (0098 and 0099) of burger king at night.
both pictures were made last night at midnight. i was impressed by
the colours, that's why i decided to take some shots.
passing this same place tonight i've noticed that something is
wrong with my pictures. both have sign "burger king" shown in
yellow or kind of orange colour when original colour is red and
maches colour of the red strap above sign. why it has happenned?

just in case i give details of pictures: both were made from tripod
from the same place at the same time (about 20 second one after
another) with no flash light.
picture 98: exposure time 1/4 sec, f number 2.8 at fl 9.25 mm
picture 99: exposure time 1/6 sec, f number 3.5 at fl 17.81 mm

thanks in advance

jack
 
steve, pete:

seems like i'm crazy but after reading steve's message i took my camera and drove a few miles to friendly burger king to check settings suggested by steve.

and guess what: friendly burger king wasn'r friendly no more. this damn place was already closed and all illumination turned off.

grrrrrhhh.....

so i just came back home (0:40 am) and brought a few shots of full moon instead.
have to go back there tomorrow night.

jack
Good Luck,

Pete
Looks better in Yellow - quick tell Burger King!

Steve
hi all:

can anybody explain to me what was wrong and why?

go there:

http://www.arnason.no/modules.php?set_albumName=album10&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
and check last 2 pictures (0098 and 0099) of burger king at night.
both pictures were made last night at midnight. i was impressed by
the colours, that's why i decided to take some shots.
passing this same place tonight i've noticed that something is
wrong with my pictures. both have sign "burger king" shown in
yellow or kind of orange colour when original colour is red and
maches colour of the red strap above sign. why it has happenned?

just in case i give details of pictures: both were made from tripod
from the same place at the same time (about 20 second one after
another) with no flash light.
picture 98: exposure time 1/4 sec, f number 2.8 at fl 9.25 mm
picture 99: exposure time 1/6 sec, f number 3.5 at fl 17.81 mm

thanks in advance

jack
 
hi all:

i just came back from friendly this time burger king where i've made a few shots due to steve's and pete's last night suggestions.
i've placed pictures in thordur arnason's place:

http://www.arnason.no/modules.php?set_albumName=album10&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php&page=1

thordur, i thank you very much for allowing me to do it.

here is a situation:

all 4 pictures are being made from the same place from tripod in a period of time about 2 minutes between first and fourth one.

details:

picture 117: camera set to automatic, sunset mode, exposure time 1/6 sec, f number 3.5, fl 14.46 mm. white balance set to automatic.

picture 118: camera set to automatic, night portrait mode, exposure time 1/6 sec, f number 3.5, fl 14.66 mm. white balance set to automatic.

picture 119: camera set to automatic, night portrait mode, exposure time 1/6 sec, f number 3.5, fl 14.66 mm. white balance set to tungsten mode (light source - incadescent light)

picture 120: camera set to automatic, night portrait mode, exposure time 1/8 sec, f number 3.5, fl 14.66 mm. white balance set to fluorescent mode (light source - fluorescent light).

and, how we all can see, "burger king" sign is still yellow and has to be red, matching red strap above.

what else can be wrong?

Jjack
seems like i'm crazy but after reading steve's message i took my
camera and drove a few miles to friendly burger king to check
settings suggested by steve.

and guess what: friendly burger king wasn'r friendly no more. this
damn place was already closed and all illumination turned off.

grrrrrhhh.....

so i just came back home (0:40 am) and brought a few shots of full
moon instead.
have to go back there tomorrow night.

jack
Good Luck,

Pete
Looks better in Yellow - quick tell Burger King!

Steve
hi all:

can anybody explain to me what was wrong and why?

go there:

http://www.arnason.no/modules.php?set_albumName=album10&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
and check last 2 pictures (0098 and 0099) of burger king at night.
both pictures were made last night at midnight. i was impressed by
the colours, that's why i decided to take some shots.
passing this same place tonight i've noticed that something is
wrong with my pictures. both have sign "burger king" shown in
yellow or kind of orange colour when original colour is red and
maches colour of the red strap above sign. why it has happenned?

just in case i give details of pictures: both were made from tripod
from the same place at the same time (about 20 second one after
another) with no flash light.
picture 98: exposure time 1/4 sec, f number 2.8 at fl 9.25 mm
picture 99: exposure time 1/6 sec, f number 3.5 at fl 17.81 mm

thanks in advance

jack
 
When things don't make sense, it is usually because we are missing the obvious. So from someone who knows nothing at all, try out this half baked theory.

When you view your orginal image in photoshop with the dropper and info tool, you find that the RGB values for your sign are only Red and Green, with no blue. A little more red than green. I guess red and green make yellow. Ok, now if there are floursence lamps powering the sign, they will actually give off a green light. So the yellow is the product of the red transparent plastic with a green light source.

So the human eye sees the red sign, but the camera sees the yellow light being produced by the combination of the green light and red sign.

Not sure this is correct, but on the other hand it is quite clear that you are not doing anything wrong. The problem is if you will beyond your control. Interesting and wierd, but nothing more. It would be interesting to see what a film camera would produce.

Jim
i just came back from friendly this time burger king where i've
made a few shots due to steve's and pete's last night suggestions.
i've placed pictures in thordur arnason's place:

http://www.arnason.no/modules.php?set_albumName=album10&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php&page=1

thordur, i thank you very much for allowing me to do it.

here is a situation:
all 4 pictures are being made from the same place from tripod in a
period of time about 2 minutes between first and fourth one.

details:
picture 117: camera set to automatic, sunset mode, exposure time
1/6 sec, f number 3.5, fl 14.46 mm. white balance set to automatic.

picture 118: camera set to automatic, night portrait mode, exposure
time 1/6 sec, f number 3.5, fl 14.66 mm. white balance set to
automatic.

picture 119: camera set to automatic, night portrait mode, exposure
time 1/6 sec, f number 3.5, fl 14.66 mm. white balance set to
tungsten mode (light source - incadescent light)

picture 120: camera set to automatic, night portrait mode, exposure
time 1/8 sec, f number 3.5, fl 14.66 mm. white balance set to
fluorescent mode (light source - fluorescent light).

and, how we all can see, "burger king" sign is still yellow and has
to be red, matching red strap above.

what else can be wrong?

Jjack
seems like i'm crazy but after reading steve's message i took my
camera and drove a few miles to friendly burger king to check
settings suggested by steve.

and guess what: friendly burger king wasn'r friendly no more. this
damn place was already closed and all illumination turned off.

grrrrrhhh.....

so i just came back home (0:40 am) and brought a few shots of full
moon instead.
have to go back there tomorrow night.

jack
Good Luck,

Pete
Looks better in Yellow - quick tell Burger King!

Steve
hi all:

can anybody explain to me what was wrong and why?

go there:

http://www.arnason.no/modules.php?set_albumName=album10&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
and check last 2 pictures (0098 and 0099) of burger king at night.
both pictures were made last night at midnight. i was impressed by
the colours, that's why i decided to take some shots.
passing this same place tonight i've noticed that something is
wrong with my pictures. both have sign "burger king" shown in
yellow or kind of orange colour when original colour is red and
maches colour of the red strap above sign. why it has happenned?

just in case i give details of pictures: both were made from tripod
from the same place at the same time (about 20 second one after
another) with no flash light.
picture 98: exposure time 1/4 sec, f number 2.8 at fl 9.25 mm
picture 99: exposure time 1/6 sec, f number 3.5 at fl 17.81 mm

thanks in advance

jack
--
Photography should be fun

http://www.pbase.com/jcollins
 
jim:

thank you for your scientific explanation of the problem. now i exactly know what is happenned. i remember discussion on this forum some time ago when picture of the girl in a red or brown skirt was posted and skirt was really black or vice versa. skirt was made from a kind of synthetic stuff and camera saw it differently.

so i went to photoshop, took the samples of red colour from outside letters and simply filled the letters by this colour. of course more cosmetic work is needed but i just was curious how it will look like. and it looks how i saw it. how i said, some cosmetic touches are needed and pictures should look like original object seen by human eye. you can see it now in thordur's place.

jack
When you view your orginal image in photoshop with the dropper and
info tool, you find that the RGB values for your sign are only Red
and Green, with no blue. A little more red than green. I guess
red and green make yellow. Ok, now if there are floursence lamps
powering the sign, they will actually give off a green light. So
the yellow is the product of the red transparent plastic with a
green light source.

So the human eye sees the red sign, but the camera sees the yellow
light being produced by the combination of the green light and red
sign.

Not sure this is correct, but on the other hand it is quite clear
that you are not doing anything wrong. The problem is if you will
beyond your control. Interesting and wierd, but nothing more. It
would be interesting to see what a film camera would produce.

Jim
i just came back from friendly this time burger king where i've
made a few shots due to steve's and pete's last night suggestions.
i've placed pictures in thordur arnason's place:

http://www.arnason.no/modules.php?set_albumName=album10&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php&page=1

thordur, i thank you very much for allowing me to do it.

here is a situation:
all 4 pictures are being made from the same place from tripod in a
period of time about 2 minutes between first and fourth one.

details:
picture 117: camera set to automatic, sunset mode, exposure time
1/6 sec, f number 3.5, fl 14.46 mm. white balance set to automatic.

picture 118: camera set to automatic, night portrait mode, exposure
time 1/6 sec, f number 3.5, fl 14.66 mm. white balance set to
automatic.

picture 119: camera set to automatic, night portrait mode, exposure
time 1/6 sec, f number 3.5, fl 14.66 mm. white balance set to
tungsten mode (light source - incadescent light)

picture 120: camera set to automatic, night portrait mode, exposure
time 1/8 sec, f number 3.5, fl 14.66 mm. white balance set to
fluorescent mode (light source - fluorescent light).

and, how we all can see, "burger king" sign is still yellow and has
to be red, matching red strap above.

what else can be wrong?

Jjack
seems like i'm crazy but after reading steve's message i took my
camera and drove a few miles to friendly burger king to check
settings suggested by steve.

and guess what: friendly burger king wasn'r friendly no more. this
damn place was already closed and all illumination turned off.

grrrrrhhh.....

so i just came back home (0:40 am) and brought a few shots of full
moon instead.
have to go back there tomorrow night.

jack
Good Luck,

Pete
Looks better in Yellow - quick tell Burger King!

Steve
hi all:

can anybody explain to me what was wrong and why?

go there:

http://www.arnason.no/modules.php?set_albumName=album10&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
and check last 2 pictures (0098 and 0099) of burger king at night.
both pictures were made last night at midnight. i was impressed by
the colours, that's why i decided to take some shots.
passing this same place tonight i've noticed that something is
wrong with my pictures. both have sign "burger king" shown in
yellow or kind of orange colour when original colour is red and
maches colour of the red strap above sign. why it has happenned?

just in case i give details of pictures: both were made from tripod
from the same place at the same time (about 20 second one after
another) with no flash light.
picture 98: exposure time 1/4 sec, f number 2.8 at fl 9.25 mm
picture 99: exposure time 1/6 sec, f number 3.5 at fl 17.81 mm

thanks in advance

jack
--
Photography should be fun

http://www.pbase.com/jcollins
 
Well, like I said, I really am an idiot when it comes to this stuff, but the explaination seems to make sense.

Jim
jim:

thank you for your scientific explanation of the problem. now i
exactly know what is happenned. i remember discussion on this forum
some time ago when picture of the girl in a red or brown skirt was
posted and skirt was really black or vice versa. skirt was made
from a kind of synthetic stuff and camera saw it differently.

so i went to photoshop, took the samples of red colour from outside
letters and simply filled the letters by this colour. of course
more cosmetic work is needed but i just was curious how it will
look like. and it looks how i saw it. how i said, some cosmetic
touches are needed and pictures should look like original object
seen by human eye. you can see it now in thordur's place.

jack
--
Photography should be fun

http://www.pbase.com/jcollins
 
It is very simple: Burger King causes a lot of gas discharge.

I agree with the narrow spectrum theory interacting with Minolta's "Faulty" bayer algorithm. Just joking, I don't really know anything about it, no need to respond...
Jim
jim:

thank you for your scientific explanation of the problem. now i
exactly know what is happenned. i remember discussion on this forum
some time ago when picture of the girl in a red or brown skirt was
posted and skirt was really black or vice versa. skirt was made
from a kind of synthetic stuff and camera saw it differently.

so i went to photoshop, took the samples of red colour from outside
letters and simply filled the letters by this colour. of course
more cosmetic work is needed but i just was curious how it will
look like. and it looks how i saw it. how i said, some cosmetic
touches are needed and pictures should look like original object
seen by human eye. you can see it now in thordur's place.

jack
--
Photography should be fun

http://www.pbase.com/jcollins
 
Jack:

You piqued my curosity, I checked out the Burger King near me and the letters are yellowish orange, just as your photo shows with a red bar above. Don't know the reason for the difference in color scheme, but it is after all the "Home of the Whopper".

Pete
 
and, how we all can see, "burger king" sign is still yellow and has
to be red, matching red strap above.
The strip reflects the rather sparse ambient light. The sign emits its own light. As a function over time, the sign will be a lot more intense than the strip. Despite you seeing them as the same color, the sign has much stronger light.

In essence, the sign is overexposed. If you take a flash picture of the same building (which would take one heck of a flash) the light reflected and the light emitted would be closer in amount (provided you use a very short time of exppsure) and you will get the same color/intensity.

Film will do the same thing. The human eye may work like a camera, but it doesn't work like film or CCD. Light doesn't "add up" on the retina; it is instantly processed and turned into a picture. That's why you see both as red and a camera doesn't.

--
Jesper
 
thanks to all of you guys. my problem was: why the red sign i sew was not red on my picure. i didn't try to get into it from scientific point of view. but....it seems that i have to from time to time. i'll try to make one or two more picture, using flash this time. let's see what's gonna happen.

anyway, picture 117a is my very first made with a little help of photoshop. but now it looks, as i saw it.
jadom
Jack:

You piqued my curosity, I checked out the Burger King near me and
the letters are yellowish orange, just as your photo shows with a
red bar above. Don't know the reason for the difference in color
scheme, but it is after all the "Home of the Whopper".

Pete
 
and one more thing, i just found out. this can be a clue. there is a strong triple fluorescent (i guess) light on high pal from the left side of the building. something like regular street lights but, i thing, much brighter. so perhaps this light source affects the final effect of my picture. what do you think?
jadom
Jack:

You piqued my curosity, I checked out the Burger King near me and
the letters are yellowish orange, just as your photo shows with a
red bar above. Don't know the reason for the difference in color
scheme, but it is after all the "Home of the Whopper".

Pete
 
We know from the flower discussion that different models of cameras have different color responses. I had a friend take an Ektachrome slide of the flower. This is standard ektachrome as opposed to saturated, very saturrated and warm/saturated variants. I hope to see it in a week or so when he finishes the row.
MartyB
and, how we all can see, "burger king" sign is still yellow and has
to be red, matching red strap above.
The strip reflects the rather sparse ambient light. The sign emits
its own light. As a function over time, the sign will be a lot more
intense than the strip. Despite you seeing them as the same color,
the sign has much stronger light.

In essence, the sign is overexposed. If you take a flash picture of
the same building (which would take one heck of a flash) the light
reflected and the light emitted would be closer in amount (provided
you use a very short time of exppsure) and you will get the same
color/intensity.

Film will do the same thing. The human eye may work like a camera,
but it doesn't work like film or CCD. Light doesn't "add up" on the
retina; it is instantly processed and turned into a picture. That's
why you see both as red and a camera doesn't.

--
Jesper
 
i didn't give up.

went there during the day and made 2 shots (pictures 121 and 122) to have original colour. then i came back at 8:30pm and made 2 more shots (pictures 127 and 128). the sign's color changing is already visible. and i came back one more time an hour later. this time i used build in flash (pictures 133 and 134). finally i got my sign in a right color. but the rest of picture is.................
i think,now i'm gonna give up.
jack

all pictures are here: http://www.arnason.no/modules.php?set_albumName=album10&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php&page=2

thanks thordur.
Jack:

You piqued my curosity, I checked out the Burger King near me and
the letters are yellowish orange, just as your photo shows with a
red bar above. Don't know the reason for the difference in color
scheme, but it is after all the "Home of the Whopper".

Pete
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top