A 'DSLR' with EVF, will it ever happen?

Think of it not as a crippled DSLR, but as a compact camera to die for.
Not compact enough to be a "compact".

--
Lee Jay
(see profile for equipment)
 
Think of it not as a crippled DSLR, but as a compact camera to die for.
in principle nothing (except cost) precludes the compact-detect AF to be as
fast as phase-detect, but much more accurate; however, failing this, such
super-compacts will be only good for static scenes (in a DSLR sense of the
term - just look at 3-6 fps action shots to see what I mean), so... in a way
whey WILL by crippled dslrs,

jpr2
--

http://www.flickriver.com/photos/qmusaget/sets/72157600341377106/
 
Think of it not as a crippled DSLR, but as a compact camera to die for.
Not compact enough to be a "compact".
I guess it remains to be seen how small they can go, but I'm hoping for something as small as a traditional film compact - not the tiny matchbox-sized things they sell today. I think we've forgotten what compact means, now that the market is swamped with sub-compacts.
 
Think of it not as a crippled DSLR, but as a compact camera to die for.
Not compact enough to be a "compact".
I guess it remains to be seen how small they can go, but I'm hoping
for something as small as a traditional film compact - not the tiny
matchbox-sized things they sell today. I think we've forgotten what
compact means, now that the market is swamped with sub-compacts.
I meant compact like the G7/G9. This technology will be as big as, or larger than the S2/S3/S5.

--
Lee Jay
(see profile for equipment)
 
Think of it not as a crippled DSLR, but as a compact camera to die for.
Not compact enough to be a "compact".
I guess it remains to be seen how small they can go, but I'm hoping
for something as small as a traditional film compact - not the tiny
matchbox-sized things they sell today. I think we've forgotten what
compact means, now that the market is swamped with sub-compacts.
I meant compact like the G7/G9. This technology will be as big as,
or larger than the S2/S3/S5.
I hope I'm right, but fear that you are.

The lenses, which we so far know nothing about, will make a huge difference. When I bought my 400D it was to replace a Fuji S602Z, which is at the small end of the 'bridge' camera range. It could reasonably be described as a compact with a big lens. Fitting my old 50/1.8 MkI to the 400D, it was overall almost exactly the same size as the Fuji. Both those cameras are sold now, so I can't show you, but the similarity was quite surprising. If Olympus can lop 20 mm off the thickness of my 400D, and produce a lens which is half way between the S602Z's and the EF 50/1.8 (ok slightly fanciful perhaps) then we would be pretty close to my ideal.

Let's just hope that the damn' thing doesn't use XD cards. Or Micro SD.
 
And btw Lee Jay, it's possible to get zero lag with an EVF. The 'EVIL' can start to take pics to the buffer as soon as you half-press the shutter button, and then, when the picture is taken, the camera will save exactly what you saw in the EVF, although it might have happened 1/10 second before.
 
Don't like the lack of focusing aids? How about computer generated
"microprisms" or "split images". Or selected areas of 10X
magnification with the surrounding area maintained "normal" to allow
you to precisely focus in one small area yet maintain framing with
the overall view remaining the same. Think "picture in picture" here.
This would be incredibly useful already on the LCD of a the 40D LiveView when doing handheld MF focusing...

--
Regards,
Roger

 
And btw Lee Jay, it's possible to get zero lag with an EVF. The
'EVIL' can start to take pics to the buffer as soon as you half-press
the shutter button, and then, when the picture is taken, the camera
will save exactly what you saw in the EVF, although it might have
happened 1/10 second before.
With an 'EVIL' it's also possible to take the photographers response-time (0,1-0,2 sec?) into account, so an EVIL can actually be better to 'Catch The Moment' than a DSLR!
 
And btw Lee Jay, it's possible to get zero lag with an EVF. The
'EVIL' can start to take pics to the buffer as soon as you half-press
the shutter button, and then, when the picture is taken, the camera
will save exactly what you saw in the EVF, although it might have
happened 1/10 second before.
With an 'EVIL' it's also possible to take the photographers
response-time (0,1-0,2 sec?) into account, so an EVIL can actually be
better to 'Catch The Moment' than a DSLR!
Shutter lag isn't the issue, even with current compacts. Auto-focus speed and viewfinder lag are the issues. The time between a movement of my hands and the response of the LCD/EVF creates an inability to tightly frame fast-moving subjects, and slow and insensitive autofocus means the subjects end up OOF unless extremely deep DOF is used.

--
Lee Jay
(see profile for equipment)
 
That is quite a lens collection for a 10 year old!
I meant that I have to wear glasses since I have been 10 years old - I'm not a native englisch speaker so give me some leeway if I get my grammar wrong once...
--
regards
Karl Günter Wünsch
 
...how you guys decided to stop posting...then continued after more than 2 years later. ;)
That is quite a lens collection for a 10 year old!
I meant that I have to wear glasses since I have been 10 years old - I'm not a native englisch speaker so give me some leeway if I get my grammar wrong once...
--
regards
Karl Günter Wünsch
--
If life was fair it would be too boring because...
  • Everybody would have the same gender
  • Everybody would look the same
  • There would be no plants and animals (it would be unfair to them having lower life forms).
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top