Not compact enough to be a "compact".Think of it not as a crippled DSLR, but as a compact camera to die for.
--
Lee Jay
(see profile for equipment)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not compact enough to be a "compact".Think of it not as a crippled DSLR, but as a compact camera to die for.
in principle nothing (except cost) precludes the compact-detect AF to be asThink of it not as a crippled DSLR, but as a compact camera to die for.
I guess it remains to be seen how small they can go, but I'm hoping for something as small as a traditional film compact - not the tiny matchbox-sized things they sell today. I think we've forgotten what compact means, now that the market is swamped with sub-compacts.Not compact enough to be a "compact".Think of it not as a crippled DSLR, but as a compact camera to die for.
I meant compact like the G7/G9. This technology will be as big as, or larger than the S2/S3/S5.I guess it remains to be seen how small they can go, but I'm hopingNot compact enough to be a "compact".Think of it not as a crippled DSLR, but as a compact camera to die for.
for something as small as a traditional film compact - not the tiny
matchbox-sized things they sell today. I think we've forgotten what
compact means, now that the market is swamped with sub-compacts.
I hope I'm right, but fear that you are.I meant compact like the G7/G9. This technology will be as big as,I guess it remains to be seen how small they can go, but I'm hopingNot compact enough to be a "compact".Think of it not as a crippled DSLR, but as a compact camera to die for.
for something as small as a traditional film compact - not the tiny
matchbox-sized things they sell today. I think we've forgotten what
compact means, now that the market is swamped with sub-compacts.
or larger than the S2/S3/S5.
quite a deterrant, for some it stops them to even consider such an uglies,Let's just hope that the damn' thing doesn't use XD cards. Or Micro SD.
The XSi/450D doesn't use XD or Micro SD. It uses SD.quite a deterrant, for some it stops them to even consider such anLet's just hope that the damn' thing doesn't use XD cards. Or Micro SD.
uglies,
This would be incredibly useful already on the LCD of a the 40D LiveView when doing handheld MF focusing...Don't like the lack of focusing aids? How about computer generated
"microprisms" or "split images". Or selected areas of 10X
magnification with the surrounding area maintained "normal" to allow
you to precisely focus in one small area yet maintain framing with
the overall view remaining the same. Think "picture in picture" here.
With an 'EVIL' it's also possible to take the photographers response-time (0,1-0,2 sec?) into account, so an EVIL can actually be better to 'Catch The Moment' than a DSLR!And btw Lee Jay, it's possible to get zero lag with an EVF. The
'EVIL' can start to take pics to the buffer as soon as you half-press
the shutter button, and then, when the picture is taken, the camera
will save exactly what you saw in the EVF, although it might have
happened 1/10 second before.
Shutter lag isn't the issue, even with current compacts. Auto-focus speed and viewfinder lag are the issues. The time between a movement of my hands and the response of the LCD/EVF creates an inability to tightly frame fast-moving subjects, and slow and insensitive autofocus means the subjects end up OOF unless extremely deep DOF is used.With an 'EVIL' it's also possible to take the photographersAnd btw Lee Jay, it's possible to get zero lag with an EVF. The
'EVIL' can start to take pics to the buffer as soon as you half-press
the shutter button, and then, when the picture is taken, the camera
will save exactly what you saw in the EVF, although it might have
happened 1/10 second before.
response-time (0,1-0,2 sec?) into account, so an EVIL can actually be
better to 'Catch The Moment' than a DSLR!
That is quite a lens collection for a 10 year old!Steen Bay wrote:
I surely would switch system if the optical viewfinder were to disappear (and that is with more than $10000 sunken into lenses) because I can't see a thing on a EVF due to the glasses I have to wear since I am 10 years old.
I meant that I have to wear glasses since I have been 10 years old - I'm not a native englisch speaker so give me some leeway if I get my grammar wrong once...That is quite a lens collection for a 10 year old!
--I meant that I have to wear glasses since I have been 10 years old - I'm not a native englisch speaker so give me some leeway if I get my grammar wrong once...That is quite a lens collection for a 10 year old!
--
regards
Karl Günter Wünsch