Question for all Camera experts

first...you are getting a very low resolution image...les than 1.5 mega pixels probably...

Second...you are using a video lens...probably no where as good as common digital camera lenses...

Third...the same reason you don't tee off with a putter...you could, but it ain't no driver!
Why not buy a Camcorder that can shoot digital still images such as this
one:
http://www.prodcat.panasonic.com/shop/product.asp?sku=PV-DV400&CategoryID=229
Why buy digital cameras? I don't get it the price for a camcorder with
digital camera capabilities is the same as the price of a digital camera.
Somone please clairfy, thankyou.
 
Actually, it is more likely 380K pixels. Or maybe? 640x480?
I either case resolution is too low.

But to me the most important part of the picture is the moment captured not the motion. In a video are too many moments and it gets confusing.
So I would never use the video part in the first place.

I do have video camera but only used it once (what a waste of money) on taking the video of my possessions for insurance.

Eugene

PS. Anybody want to buy video camera cheap?
Second...you are using a video lens...probably no where as good as common
digital camera lenses...

Third...the same reason you don't tee off with a putter...you could, but
it ain't no driver!
Why not buy a Camcorder that can shoot digital still images such as this
one:
http://www.prodcat.panasonic.com/shop/product.asp?sku=PV-DV400&CategoryID=229
Why buy digital cameras? I don't get it the price for a camcorder with
digital camera capabilities is the same as the price of a digital camera.
Somone please clairfy, thankyou.
 
You could, but not for professional level work...or even advanced amateur...the quality of tool reflects the quality of the work.
Eugene

PS. Anybody want to buy video camera cheap?
Second...you are using a video lens...probably no where as good as common
digital camera lenses...

Third...the same reason you don't tee off with a putter...you could, but
it ain't no driver!
Why not buy a Camcorder that can shoot digital still images such as this
one:
http://www.prodcat.panasonic.com/shop/product.asp?sku=PV-DV400&CategoryID=229
Why buy digital cameras? I don't get it the price for a camcorder with
digital camera capabilities is the same as the price of a digital camera.
Somone please clairfy, thankyou.
 
Because the images look like c* when comparted to still images. A publication I send to used one once becuase it was the ONLY image from the event they could get. It was obviously from a cam corder.

If you are serious, then use stills. If not, ????
 
Eugene

PS. Anybody want to buy video camera cheap?
Second...you are using a video lens...probably no where as good as common
digital camera lenses...

Third...the same reason you don't tee off with a putter...you could, but
it ain't no driver!
Why not buy a Camcorder that can shoot digital still images such as this
one:
http://www.prodcat.panasonic.com/shop/product.asp?sku=PV-DV400&CategoryID=229
Why buy digital cameras? I don't get it the price for a camcorder with
digital camera capabilities is the same as the price of a digital camera.
Somone please clairfy, thankyou.
Picture quality is the main reason I don't use a camcorder. Second from a social standpoint I find people tend to be self conscious around the
camcorder. Plus if you are taking the pictures you are "watched". With the SLR or digital single shot camera you can take more candid photos. If

I may aske, while I am here, has anyone compared the Canon 1V to the Nikon F5. I know this is digital forum but I am hoping some pro's would be

so kind as to give me a comparison. My E-mail would be fine as no one else is probably interested in this forum.

Thanks
Jimmy
 
I use a Sony DV Camcorder to capture images used for web only, Quicktime VR Objects. The quality is good enough. But the main advantage is that it is fast. And web files need not have the quality of print. Really it's true, lol.

Angus
 
When you are standing behind the camera, you know that you have a task to accomplish.
.
If it is a film camera (video), you would like to make a nice movie with it.

If it is a photo camera, you want to capture the moment and nothing else. There is no sound, action or movement. You have only a fraction of a second to catch the moment that tells it all. You as the photographer will interpret the picture by remembering the circumstances, the light, time of day, sounds, smells

and your personal attitude when you took the picture. The viewer has no access to any of this information. If you can take good pictures, than the viewer will understand right away what the picture is about.

Do you think that this can be achievied just by cutting out a frame out of a movie and presenting it as a photograph?

Andrzej
Second...you are using a video lens...probably no where as good as common
digital camera lenses...

Third...the same reason you don't tee off with a putter...you could, but
it ain't no driver!
Why not buy a Camcorder that can shoot digital still images such as this
one:
http://www.prodcat.panasonic.com/shop/product.asp?sku=PV-DV400&CategoryID=229
Why buy digital cameras? I don't get it the price for a camcorder with
digital camera capabilities is the same as the price of a digital camera.
Somone please clairfy, thankyou.
 
Actually, YES. So many frames to choose from. Unfortunately, single frames are such a low quality. If they only had video camera with D1 quality pictures.

Eugene
Do you think that this can be achievied just by cutting out a frame out
of a movie and presenting it as a photograph?

Andrzej
Second...you are using a video lens...probably no where as good as common
digital camera lenses...

Third...the same reason you don't tee off with a putter...you could, but
it ain't no driver!
Why not buy a Camcorder that can shoot digital still images such as this
one:
http://www.prodcat.panasonic.com/shop/product.asp?sku=PV-DV400&CategoryID=229
Why buy digital cameras? I don't get it the price for a camcorder with
digital camera capabilities is the same as the price of a digital camera.
Somone please clairfy, thankyou.
 
Yes, if you are lucky. The main objective was to make a movie and not a photograph which should tell it all in a single shot.
You may be able to find that shot within the many though.

Andrzej
Eugene
Do you think that this can be achievied just by cutting out a frame out
of a movie and presenting it as a photograph?

Andrzej
Second...you are using a video lens...probably no where as good as common
digital camera lenses...

Third...the same reason you don't tee off with a putter...you could, but
it ain't no driver!
Why not buy a Camcorder that can shoot digital still images such as this
one:
http://www.prodcat.panasonic.com/shop/product.asp?sku=PV-DV400&CategoryID=229
Why buy digital cameras? I don't get it the price for a camcorder with
digital camera capabilities is the same as the price of a digital camera.
Somone please clairfy, thankyou.
 
One more thing:

I think that the world of the "visual creators" (for lack of a better word) is divided into two teams: The Still Photographersb and The Film Makers.

I am taking pictures for over 20 years now (amateur) and bought myself a video camera some years back. I used it maybe 3 times, while I am using my various photo cameras just about daily. Could'nt get excited about the "new medium".

Blame me.

Andrzej
Andrzej
Eugene
Do you think that this can be achievied just by cutting out a frame out
of a movie and presenting it as a photograph?

Andrzej
Second...you are using a video lens...probably no where as good as common
digital camera lenses...

Third...the same reason you don't tee off with a putter...you could, but
it ain't no driver!
Why not buy a Camcorder that can shoot digital still images such as this
one:
http://www.prodcat.panasonic.com/shop/product.asp?sku=PV-DV400&CategoryID=229
Why buy digital cameras? I don't get it the price for a camcorder with
digital camera capabilities is the same as the price of a digital camera.
Somone please clairfy, thankyou.
 
Interesting topic, actually. The new HD-700 camcorder from Sony shoots 3 million

pixel high definition video (for about $70,000) through pro optics onto high speed
tape. Arguably, any single image from this camera (it shoots in

progressive/non-interlaced mode optionally) is equal in resolution to a D1. The fact
is, it is only a matter of a few more years before resolution of imaging devices

becomes irrelevant, basically. So shooting video, digital stills, or film will be
equivalent technically. Of course, this has already been true with 35 mm film

cameras. Scan a frame of film, and it's the same from an arriflex or a nikon. But you
don't see many commercial shooters shooting motion film. It's too expensive and

there is too much waste. With video, the cost goes down but the time required for

editing remains. I have used digital and hi-8 video in the past in composites and

posters where the effect was appropriate. I prefer to shoot sporting events on video
and select out the frames I need, and then cleaning them up in photoshop. A good
close up, with some filtering, holds up well even if it starts at 640x480.
Pursue your vision. Choose the right tools for the job.
Kevin
http://www.studiotwo.com
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top