Auke Nauta
Active member
Hi,
I'm looking into alternatives to DIVU, when it comes to interpolating the RAW image files from these Minolta camera's.
BTW, it's a shame Minolta did not reduce the file size for .RAW files.
As the actual AD converter is 12-bit, they could have stored a 4-pixel data in 6 bytes. Yet Minolta chose to store each pixel data in 2 bytes, wasting 33% space and increasing the storage time to the Flash media
But, I was talking about RAW image interoplation:
DIVU is using bilinear interpolation which is fast (probably used in-camera as well) yet not very accurate.
Alternatives exist which are more computational costly but give substantially better results.
Does anyone know if such an application already exists?
If not, I'm going to write it myself (which I will probably do anyway...)
Anyone interested?
Greetings,
Auke Nauta
I'm looking into alternatives to DIVU, when it comes to interpolating the RAW image files from these Minolta camera's.
BTW, it's a shame Minolta did not reduce the file size for .RAW files.
As the actual AD converter is 12-bit, they could have stored a 4-pixel data in 6 bytes. Yet Minolta chose to store each pixel data in 2 bytes, wasting 33% space and increasing the storage time to the Flash media
But, I was talking about RAW image interoplation:
DIVU is using bilinear interpolation which is fast (probably used in-camera as well) yet not very accurate.
Alternatives exist which are more computational costly but give substantially better results.
Does anyone know if such an application already exists?
If not, I'm going to write it myself (which I will probably do anyway...)
Anyone interested?
Greetings,
Auke Nauta