Reading mode: Light Dark

A900

Go to last post
M

mguthrie

Active member
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Location
TX, US
So I just talked to a Sony Rep that comes into my store ( I work for Best Buy) and I was asking him about the a900. He told me that the company had sent out preliminary pricing on the a900 about a month ago to the reps. He said its not nailed down yet but that they are aiming at the sub-$2000 market. Which would put it at less than half the price of the least expensive full frame camera available now (canon 5d @ $3000). Im not sure what to make of this or if I should believe this.....
 
mguthrie said:
So I just talked to a Sony Rep that comes into my store ( I work for
Best Buy) and I was asking him about the a900. He told me that the
company had sent out preliminary pricing on the a900 about a month
ago to the reps. He said its not nailed down yet but that they are
aiming at the sub-$2000 market. Which would put it at less than
half the price of the least expensive full frame camera available now
(canon 5d @ $3000). Im not sure what to make of this or if I should
believe this.....
Click to expand...
If it is less than $2000 I will be shocked - pleasantly shocked - but shocked none the less.

--
fjbyrne
 
That is what i told the Son rep. He said that the move to do this would be most likely to gain a larger portion of the market share and become a bigger player in the DSLR market (wouldn't suprise me although seems alittle unlike Sony).
 
probably trying to sell some of their uber lenses as well.. cant go cheap with 25 mp to cover
 
This is some what related...

I went to two different best buys and they gave me different reasons as to why the A700 is no longer available. One mentioned that Sony has discontinued the A700. Another mentioned that if folks are spending $1,400 on a camera they gravitate towards Nikon & Canon, hence why they stopped selling the A700 (slow sales).

So maybe if Sony wants to grab your attention/more market share, a price point of around $2,000 for the A900 may be reasonable...just a thought...
 
I am trying really, really hard not to get too excited by this post, and I guess we'll know soon enough if it's true. If this fullframe camera is less than $2000, I am going to have a smile on my face for a long, long time. :)
 
sub $2k sounds right,...
don't forget to add grip and batteries, and new flash,.... $2.9k

by the time you add the lenses,....
canon be cheaper to own,...
aka, was happy with the 85mm 1.8, for $440
on sony I need to get an 1.4 for $1360 ,....
do that a couple time,....

once it gets out, I'll probably want one,...

-----



http/ www.robsphoto.com
 
--
RomeoD
 
phatjoe said:
This is some what related...

I went to two different best buys and they gave me different reasons
as to why the A700 is no longer available. One mentioned that Sony
has discontinued the A700. Another mentioned that if folks are
spending $1,400 on a camera they gravitate towards Nikon & Canon,
hence why they stopped selling the A700 (slow sales).

So maybe if Sony wants to grab your attention/more market share, a
price point of around $2,000 for the A900 may be reasonable...just a
thought...
Click to expand...
It would be a heck of a move by Sony. It would immediately put them way out in front of the FF value equation. It would also send shock waves through the DSLR industry IMO. It would put price pressure on the Canon 5D replacement that's for sure.

--
fjbyrne
 
the excellent Canon 5d currently the cheapest ff entry camera - does not come with VG or external flash either and their quality lenses are not cheap either!

this pricing is very expeculative and would be a great surprise.

to anyone already with km/sony lenses this would be very temptimg. to anyone not already invested in km/sony but looking into a ff system this would be very tempting.

--
dancph
 
headofdestiny said:
Being #2 in the DSLR industry doesn't seem like an impossibility for
Sony if this rumor is true.
Click to expand...
i disagree. Nikon and Canon are pretty huge. I dont know who has what percentage, but sony has a lot of catching up to play. Plus you have the fact that a lot of people will got to a local big box retailer for a camera. These places usually have staff that are undereducated in the products that they are selling. They will tell people to buy one camera over another due to either their personal preference, what their friends/family own, or even by what management tells them.

Pricing is a starting point, but they also need to step up their game with instore displays, TV advertisements, internet advertisements, and also their product offering. Their first party branded accessory catalog is still limited. They need to expand this to allow more choice.
 
There are no fullframe Sony DSLRs, yet. Your Sony's are known as APS-C. Fullframe means the image sensor is the same size as a 35mm frame of film, and, so far, is only available in three current DSLRs: Canon 5D, 1Ds III (and older 1Ds') and the Nikon D3.

Fullframe's advantages are many. Google it :)
 
Would a sub-$2K A900 be a breakthrough? Sure it would...to those of us "in the know," and who can see beyond the brand name. But the A100 was a similar breakthrough in its day. (Imagine! A D200 equivalent for under a grand...and with in-body stabilization to boot.) It sold decently, but scarcely made the "best-seller list" of the camera world. Similarly, the A700 compared very well to its Canikon rivals at a better price-point...and hasn't exactly been flying off the shelves, as evidenced by Best Buy and Circuit City dropping it. Meanwhile, lots of people keep buying the D300 and 40D, far more than are buying Sony's products, even when it means shelling out several hundred dollars for the same capabilities. And even more are grabbing D40s and Digital Rebel Whatevers, making it more likely that they'll go with one of those brands as they "move up."

Unfortunately, it seems to me that Sony's efforts are coming up against the "one letter too few" syndrome. No matter what the product line's capabilities, it seems that far too many camera buyers, even in the "prosumer" or "lower-cost professional" ranges, refuse to consider S-O-N-Y when they can get C-A-N-O-N or N-I-K-O-N instead. While a(nother) Sony price-performance breakthrough like a sub-$2k A900 will have some impact, I suspect it will be nothing like what would hapen if either company with those magic five letters in their name were to introduce such a model, even priced a thousand bucks higher. I'm pretty much convinced that, to be able to climb to #2 (or even a large #3 share), Sony's going to need to be in this for the long haul, with enough of a track record that DSLR buyers won't have their first mental reaction when they hear "Sony" be "camcorders and plasma TVs," and when enough people have acquired Alpha-mount "consumer-grade" DSLRs that their first inclination when they upgrade will be to stick with the same platform. Single-camera breakthroughs will certainly help, but even this one won't turn the tide quickly. IMHO.

--
James David Walley
http://www.ravenfallsphotography.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top