Another review... k20d

Here it is:

http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews_pentax_k20d.php

--
Impossible is something that takes a little bit more work to achieve...





[email protected]

Have you checked my blog today? Go on, and leave your comments, because a blog without comments is a borring blog...
http://my.opera.com/milarmon/albums/

Thanks for posting.
Douglas Film

I found the image quality photos in the article to be very bad. It looked like they got them out of order. I.E. 400 iso looked better than 100 iso, and so on.

Louis

one of the worst review i've seen yet. That reviewer should play a gameboy or something instead of wasting his time writing trash. Or maybe use time to think logically about what he's doing. He obviously have no clue.

Although I generally found it to be a positive review, I do not agree with some of their findings. I'd also like to know what lens they based their opinions on. A really good lens is a must for a test of a camera like the K20D, or any fine camera. You can't test a NASCAR with some Wallmart Cost-Cutter tires?

Their comparison with K10D high ISO performance is just plain wrong. There is no comparison, let's see the K10D's 6400 here. Above 800 there is no similarity, I guarantee you. I know, I shot for an entire week at 1600 and above, and was never unhappy with the results. Let them repeat this with the K10D, and get back with me.......I won't hold my breath!
6400



6400 filtered with Neat Image



--
'This is more serious than I thought.....but it is still fun!
http://www.pbase.com/rupertdog Take a look- It's Free!