Disappointed

Frederic Villemin

Well-known member
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
Location
US
I'm sure that everything i will say has already been discussed in the forum but i'm sorry i don't have enough time to read all the messages :)

I bought a Dimage5 yesterday.. i had read many reviews about it, eating batteries faster than i eat pizzas and having a bad AF.. I thought it wouldn't be a problem and i was still happy to buy it

About the batteries, the 4 AA supplied lasted 10 minutes..but i think that's normal :) The rechargeable batteries i bought are still alive after 30 minutes of use, so that's not too bad.. the problem is just you aren't warned before the camera goes down.. it could have been better to be able to take one or two photos before it stops.. but well i don't really care because i can buy another of batteries..

The point i really don't like is the AF.. it's really really bad.. i have a 35mm EOS 500 which has a really simple AF which works way better than this one.. and even if it doesn't work well i can do it manually easily.. With the dimage5 and its EVF it's really hard to find the focus manually.. you have to trust the AF and it's sad to see it isn't able to find the focus on really simple shots..

I tried to use the spot AF and it seems to work better than the other way but it's too bad to have such a good camera doing such a bad job (my old Kodak DC240 was a king in AF compared to this one)

It's my second day with this camera, maybe i'll tell you everything's fine in 5 days because i would be used to it but at the moment, i'm quite disappointed..
 
I'm sure that everything i will say has already been discussed in
the forum but i'm sorry i don't have enough time to read all the
messages :)

I bought a Dimage5 yesterday.. i had read many reviews about it,
eating batteries faster than i eat pizzas and having a bad AF.. I
thought it wouldn't be a problem and i was still happy to buy it

About the batteries, the 4 AA supplied lasted 10 minutes..but i
think that's normal :) The rechargeable batteries i bought are
still alive after 30 minutes of use, so that's not too bad.. the
problem is just you aren't warned before the camera goes down.. it
could have been better to be able to take one or two photos before
it stops.. but well i don't really care because i can buy another
of batteries..

The point i really don't like is the AF.. it's really really bad..
i have a 35mm EOS 500 which has a really simple AF which works way
better than this one.. and even if it doesn't work well i can do it
manually easily.. With the dimage5 and its EVF it's really hard to
find the focus manually.. you have to trust the AF and it's sad to
see it isn't able to find the focus on really simple shots..

I tried to use the spot AF and it seems to work better than the
other way but it's too bad to have such a good camera doing such a
bad job (my old Kodak DC240 was a king in AF compared to this one)

It's my second day with this camera, maybe i'll tell you
everything's fine in 5 days because i would be used to it but at
the moment, i'm quite disappointed..
What a funny/cute human you are. Going for something that dated so long while the D7i is in the market? Furthermore, there are better camera than the D5 and i suppose you didn't read those reviews here? It is ur fault for not doing your homework, can't blame other. All the best on ur D5 :)
 
I'm sure that everything i will say has already been discussed in
the forum but i'm sorry i don't have enough time to read all the
messages :)

I bought a Dimage5 yesterday.. i had read many reviews about it,
eating batteries faster than i eat pizzas and having a bad AF.. I
thought it wouldn't be a problem and i was still happy to buy it

About the batteries, the 4 AA supplied lasted 10 minutes..but i
think that's normal :) The rechargeable batteries i bought are
still alive after 30 minutes of use, so that's not too bad.. the
problem is just you aren't warned before the camera goes down.. it
could have been better to be able to take one or two photos before
it stops.. but well i don't really care because i can buy another
of batteries..

The point i really don't like is the AF.. it's really really bad..
i have a 35mm EOS 500 which has a really simple AF which works way
better than this one.. and even if it doesn't work well i can do it
manually easily.. With the dimage5 and its EVF it's really hard to
find the focus manually.. you have to trust the AF and it's sad to
see it isn't able to find the focus on really simple shots..

I tried to use the spot AF and it seems to work better than the
other way but it's too bad to have such a good camera doing such a
bad job (my old Kodak DC240 was a king in AF compared to this one)

It's my second day with this camera, maybe i'll tell you
everything's fine in 5 days because i would be used to it but at
the moment, i'm quite disappointed..
What a funny/cute human you are. Going for something that dated so
long while the D7i is in the market? Furthermore, there are better
camera than the D5 and i suppose you didn't read those reviews
here? It is ur fault for not doing your homework, can't blame
other. All the best on ur D5 :)
Hi,

Don't worry about battery performance; the more you use the batteries the better they will perform. (I'm assuming you are starting with a new set of NiMHs).

I to have a D5 and I'm also not that impressed with the AF. Action shots are not really possible.

Hope you are getting some good shots.

Jim
 
What a funny/cute human you are. Going for something that dated so
long while the D7i is in the market? Furthermore, there are better
camera than the D5 and i suppose you didn't read those reviews
here? It is ur fault for not doing your homework, can't blame
other. All the best on ur D5 :)
You know what ? i don't have enough money to buy the dimage7i :)

and i don't think i would be really happier to spend twice the money just to get a good AF and a better quality i'm not really looking for..

I just said i was expecting a better AF from a 800 EU camera..

And even if the dimage 5 is quite old, it still has good reviews everywhere.. that's why i'm disappointed.. i was waiting for better performances..

btw you said there were better cameras than the D5 (i think you were talking about same prices), can you tell me more ? i may return it to the shop and change if i really find something better
 
What a funny/cute human you are. Going for something that dated so
long while the D7i is in the market? Furthermore, there are better
camera than the D5 and i suppose you didn't read those reviews
here? It is ur fault for not doing your homework, can't blame
other. All the best on ur D5 :)
You know what ? i don't have enough money to buy the dimage7i :)
and i don't think i would be really happier to spend twice the
money just to get a good AF and a better quality i'm not really
looking for..

I just said i was expecting a better AF from a 800 EU camera..

And even if the dimage 5 is quite old, it still has good reviews
everywhere.. that's why i'm disappointed.. i was waiting for better
performances..

btw you said there were better cameras than the D5 (i think you
were talking about same prices), can you tell me more ? i may
return it to the shop and change if i really find something better
Sorry dude, i am not so good on digital camera but i think that G2 from Canon might please you since you on a budget. What about 995 from Nikon or CP 2500? CP 2500 is only a 2 MP but from the review, it seem to be better than D5. Sony product, i think your budget wouldn't reach the F707 and so, forget it and i also dun recommend it in the first place (personnal reason, lol) Maybe you browse around this website to check out those good camera which selling at a reasonable price. I am going for the D7i and i learn from there rather than spending $ on other and don't learn much. Good luck on your new camera if you change for one.

Dman
 
Frederic Villemin wrote:

Sorry dude
What is it about people who post wit the word 'dude'?
i am not so good on digital camera but i think that G2
from Canon might please you since you on a budget. What about 995
from Nikon or CP 2500? CP 2500 is only a 2 MP but from the review,
it seem to be better than D5
CP2500 seems better than a D5 .......... !!!!

Well it's not bad we cam by the look of things -- but it's a bit
like comparing an APS P&S with a 35mm AF SLR in terms of the
target market.

Not a particularly valid comparison.

--
---------------
Andrew.
 
I've got a D 5 qnd I see nothing wrong with it. It takes good pictures. I think that you will find others who feel the same way. I have yet to see any camera on these forums that does not have something wrong with it. I think that sometimes it's the user and not the camera at all. They then return the camera and buy another only to find new problems, and the cycle goes on and on and on.

Jerry
Portland, Oregon
Frederic Villemin wrote:

Sorry dude
What is it about people who post wit the word 'dude'?
i am not so good on digital camera but i think that G2
from Canon might please you since you on a budget. What about 995
from Nikon or CP 2500? CP 2500 is only a 2 MP but from the review,
it seem to be better than D5
CP2500 seems better than a D5 .......... !!!!

Well it's not bad we cam by the look of things -- but it's a bit
like comparing an APS P&S with a 35mm AF SLR in terms of the
target market.

Not a particularly valid comparison.

--
---------------
Andrew.
 
We had a Kodak 2.1 MP digital camera and my son still has a Kodak 1 MP and both cameras seemed reasonably quick on the auto focus. Perhaps there is a trade-off--the more pixels the camera has to process, the more time it takes. - JR
I'm sure that everything i will say has already been discussed in
the forum but i'm sorry i don't have enough time to read all the
messages :)

I bought a Dimage5 yesterday.. i had read many reviews about it,
eating batteries faster than i eat pizzas and having a bad AF.. I
thought it wouldn't be a problem and i was still happy to buy it

About the batteries, the 4 AA supplied lasted 10 minutes..but i
think that's normal :) The rechargeable batteries i bought are
still alive after 30 minutes of use, so that's not too bad.. the
problem is just you aren't warned before the camera goes down.. it
could have been better to be able to take one or two photos before
it stops.. but well i don't really care because i can buy another
of batteries..

The point i really don't like is the AF.. it's really really bad..
i have a 35mm EOS 500 which has a really simple AF which works way
better than this one.. and even if it doesn't work well i can do it
manually easily.. With the dimage5 and its EVF it's really hard to
find the focus manually.. you have to trust the AF and it's sad to
see it isn't able to find the focus on really simple shots..

I tried to use the spot AF and it seems to work better than the
other way but it's too bad to have such a good camera doing such a
bad job (my old Kodak DC240 was a king in AF compared to this one)

It's my second day with this camera, maybe i'll tell you
everything's fine in 5 days because i would be used to it but at
the moment, i'm quite disappointed..
 
Jerry
Portland, Oregon
Frederic Villemin wrote:

Sorry dude
What is it about people who post wit the word 'dude'?
i am not so good on digital camera but i think that G2
from Canon might please you since you on a budget. What about 995
from Nikon or CP 2500? CP 2500 is only a 2 MP but from the review,
it seem to be better than D5
CP2500 seems better than a D5 .......... !!!!

Well it's not bad we cam by the look of things -- but it's a bit
like comparing an APS P&S with a 35mm AF SLR in terms of the
target market.

Not a particularly valid comparison.

--
---------------
Jerry , sometimes after the new problem, we end up keeping it.This point can be argued for a long time .I tried around ten digitals and bought two.Many people want better quality, many don't but I feel for the camera makers and sellers also.Just don't push the guilt thing , cause we are still in the early stages of this technology.When you have foveron technology and people return their cameras then thats another issue.Or if someone buys a tv to watch the super bowl and returns it the next day , thats a different issue.Too many quirky things still going on.To repackage a camera should not be more then ten or fifteen bucks and I would gladly pay it to try a camera out.
 
I to have a D5 and I'm also not that impressed with the AF. Action
shots are not really possible.

Hope you are getting some good shots.

Jim
Hmm,

I guess I better quit taking action shots with my D5 since "Action shots ARE NOT really POSSIBLE."

Naaa, I think I will follow the route of the bumble bee, since it is a scientific engineering impossibility for it to fly, but nobody told the bee so it just goes ahead and flies anyway.
Good day, think I'll go out an take some action shots with my D5.

Steven (Minnesota)
 
I've got a D 5 qnd I see nothing wrong with it. It takes good
pictures. I think that you will find others who feel the same way.
I have yet to see any camera on these forums that does not have
something wrong with it. I think that sometimes it's the user and
not the camera at all. They then return the camera and buy another
only to find new problems, and the cycle goes on and on and on.

Jerry
Portland, Oregon
Jerry,
WELL SAID!!!

Steven (Minnesota)
 
Hi Steven,
Is your heat problem solved?
I to have a D5 and I'm also not that impressed with the AF. Action
shots are not really possible.

Hope you are getting some good shots.

Jim
Hmm,
I guess I better quit taking action shots with my D5 since "Action
shots ARE NOT really POSSIBLE."
Naaa, I think I will follow the route of the bumble bee, since it
is a scientific engineering impossibility for it to fly, but nobody
told the bee so it just goes ahead and flies anyway.
Good day, think I'll go out an take some action shots with my D5.

Steven (Minnesota)
 
We had a Kodak 2.1 MP digital camera and my son still has a Kodak 1
MP and both cameras seemed reasonably quick on the auto focus.
Perhaps there is a trade-off--the more pixels the camera has to
process, the more time it takes. - JR
That and longer lens focal length.

--
---------------
Andrew.
 
I'm sure that everything i will say has already been discussed in
the forum but i'm sorry i don't have enough time to read all the
messages :)
It's my second day with this camera, maybe i'll tell you
everything's fine in 5 days because i would be used to it but at
the moment, i'm quite disappointed..
Some friendly advice...

First off, you NEED to TAKE the TIME to go thru this forum and read some past posts, you'll find lots of info and lots of help by TAKING this time :-)

Second, you've admittedly ONLY had your D5 for a couple days, as has been stated in many threads in this forum, the D7/D5 is NOT a simple point and shoot camera, and takes a little time to learn to get good pictures.

Third, if you haven't already, take the time to sit down and go thru the manual WITH THE CAMERA. Go over all the features and buttons, etc. in the manual and the camera. Just getting to know the D5 is half the battle (and half the fun).

Forth, get at least 2 (x4) sets of NiMH batteries. And 4 (x4) sets if you can afford it. The D7/D5 does require a lot of power (not that this is a bad thing) but its the way the camera is and as an owner you simply have to deal with it the best you can :-)

Fifth, the EVF. Yes at first it seems to be poor. Yes at first it doesn't seem to be anywhere as good as an optical view finder on a 35mm camera. But, once you get used to the EVF (and stop fighting it) you'll find its not all that bad. With some practice you'll find you CAN actually manually focus with it (although NOT in the same way as you did with a 35mm optical VF) and you'll find the exposure (ie: how bright or how dark) things look in the EVF is exactly what the final picture will look like.

Sixth, the auto focus. Again yes at first it seems to be poor, and yes at first it seems nowhere near as good as the AF on your 35mm camera (and this is true its NOT THAT GOOD), but thats not to say it doesn't work. And like the EVF, once you STOP FIGHTING the auto focus, you'll find its not all that bad.

(There have been reports where the AF on D5's fails to focus AT ALL, and the camera needs to be restarted to get it to work for a bit before it fails AGAIN completely) if you HAVE this problem send it to Minolta for warranty repair, if not, forget about this particular problem (it doesn't concern you).

2 tips for using the auto focus on a D5

1) ALWAYS USE FRESH BATTERIES.
(check out the Internet for the use and care of NiMH batteries)

I've noticed with my own D5, if the batteries are low the AF has a harder time of it. If your AF seems slow or seems to have a hard time locking on the subject, REPLACE the batteries, even if you haven't gotten the low battery warning, replace them ANYWAY!

2) the D5 (and the D7) have a LONG ZOOM lens, you HAVE TO HOLD it VERY STILL!! This takes some practice (for some LOT OF PRACTICE), and to start you SHOULD use a fairly fast shutter speed (1/500 or above), because ANY LITTLE movement WILL give you fuzzy pictures!

My advice, give yourself a couple months to get to know your D5, I think, you'll be MUCH HAPPIER after you get used to how the D5 functions :-)

AND stop litening to those who poo poo the D5 :-)
  • Ivan
 
Actually, that was overly simplistic and condescending. While it can be argued that every camera on this forum has something wrong with it, each has its own unique achilles heel.

Deciding which batch of strenghs and weaknesses we most want to put up with is like choosing a companion. Most of us have our own criteria, and one man's niggle may be another man's pet peeve.

Why people would participate in a camera equipment forum with the attitude of "just live with it; it's good enough for me" is beyond me.

I switched brands of camera after my first digicam disappointed me too many times, and I've been quite happy with the replacement. Now I have new problems I didn't have before, but they aren't nearly as intrusive to my shooting as those of the previous camera.

As for the original post, if the AF is not acceptable to you, then by all means return it for a different camera before it's too late. Try out some other cameras in the shop and see which one has the AF you desire. You will probably find it.
I've got a D 5 qnd I see nothing wrong with it. It takes good
pictures. I think that you will find others who feel the same way.
I have yet to see any camera on these forums that does not have
something wrong with it. I think that sometimes it's the user and
not the camera at all. They then return the camera and buy another
only to find new problems, and the cycle goes on and on and on.

Jerry
Portland, Oregon
Jerry,
WELL SAID!!!

Steven (Minnesota)
 
Try out some other cameras in the shop and see which one has the AF
you desire. You will probably find it.
But it's not necessarily a solution when it turns out that it's a Nikon D1x
and you're not inclined to take out a second mortgage to go with it.

Ah well ....

--
---------------
Andrew.
 
Ivan --

I really liked your reply especially bullet #3 about reading the manual WITH the camera in hand. How can one expect to learn -- really learn -- the functions without first sitting down and experimenting with them?

I don't own a DC yet, when I do purchase, I expect I'll need lots of help -- extensively from this forum --but this post gets right to it. All of your suggestions/recommendations were right on the money. These seem like common-sense type of things yet not everyone follows them. I wonder why that is?

Thanks again for your positing!
I'm sure that everything i will say has already been discussed in
the forum but i'm sorry i don't have enough time to read all the
messages :)
It's my second day with this camera, maybe i'll tell you
everything's fine in 5 days because i would be used to it but at
the moment, i'm quite disappointed..
Some friendly advice...

First off, you NEED to TAKE the TIME to go thru this forum and read
some past posts, you'll find lots of info and lots of help by
TAKING this time :-)

Second, you've admittedly ONLY had your D5 for a couple days, as
has been stated in many threads in this forum, the D7/D5 is NOT a
simple point and shoot camera, and takes a little time to learn to
get good pictures.

Third, if you haven't already, take the time to sit down and go
thru the manual WITH THE CAMERA. Go over all the features and
buttons, etc. in the manual and the camera. Just getting to know
the D5 is half the battle (and half the fun).

Forth, get at least 2 (x4) sets of NiMH batteries. And 4 (x4) sets
if you can afford it. The D7/D5 does require a lot of power (not
that this is a bad thing) but its the way the camera is and as an
owner you simply have to deal with it the best you can :-)

Fifth, the EVF. Yes at first it seems to be poor. Yes at first it
doesn't seem to be anywhere as good as an optical view finder on a
35mm camera. But, once you get used to the EVF (and stop fighting
it) you'll find its not all that bad. With some practice you'll
find you CAN actually manually focus with it (although NOT in the
same way as you did with a 35mm optical VF) and you'll find the
exposure (ie: how bright or how dark) things look in the EVF is
exactly what the final picture will look like.

Sixth, the auto focus. Again yes at first it seems to be poor, and
yes at first it seems nowhere near as good as the AF on your 35mm
camera (and this is true its NOT THAT GOOD), but thats not to say
it doesn't work. And like the EVF, once you STOP FIGHTING the auto
focus, you'll find its not all that bad.

(There have been reports where the AF on D5's fails to focus AT
ALL, and the camera needs to be restarted to get it to work for a
bit before it fails AGAIN completely) if you HAVE this problem send
it to Minolta for warranty repair, if not, forget about this
particular problem (it doesn't concern you).

2 tips for using the auto focus on a D5

1) ALWAYS USE FRESH BATTERIES.
(check out the Internet for the use and care of NiMH batteries)

I've noticed with my own D5, if the batteries are low the AF has a
harder time of it. If your AF seems slow or seems to have a hard
time locking on the subject, REPLACE the batteries, even if you
haven't gotten the low battery warning, replace them ANYWAY!

2) the D5 (and the D7) have a LONG ZOOM lens, you HAVE TO HOLD it
VERY STILL!! This takes some practice (for some LOT OF PRACTICE),
and to start you SHOULD use a fairly fast shutter speed (1/500 or
above), because ANY LITTLE movement WILL give you fuzzy pictures!

My advice, give yourself a couple months to get to know your D5, I
think, you'll be MUCH HAPPIER after you get used to how the D5
functions :-)

AND stop litening to those who poo poo the D5 :-)
  • Ivan
 
LOL!! Sad but true, Adrew; if you want $350 film camera AF in a digicam, you have to shell out $3500.

Some day, some day...
Try out some other cameras in the shop and see which one has the AF
you desire. You will probably find it.
But it's not necessarily a solution when it turns out that it's a
Nikon D1x
and you're not inclined to take out a second mortgage to go with it.

Ah well ....

--
---------------
Andrew.
 
Ivan --

I really liked your reply especially bullet #3 about reading the
manual WITH the camera in hand. How can one expect to learn --
really learn -- the functions without first sitting down and
experimenting with them?
Thanks, I've spent a lot of time with my D5 (my 2nd digtal camera) and think I'm getting the hang of it :-)

You'd be surprised how many people think ALL they should have to do is pay $1000.00 and point and shoot a digital camera (without reading the manual of course) AND instantly it'll make them a world renowned National Geographic type photographer over night.

And if it DOESN'T, then why there MUST be something WRONG with the camera, or at LEAST a conspiracy from the manufacture to rip them off....

Sad but true....
  • Ivan
 
There was a Far Side cartoon that had an old professor holding a sign that read "death to all extremists," but he was being viewed through a gunsight by one of his followers who, unfortunately for him, was too loyal to his cause.

Where did the middle ground go here? On one side, this forum is being bombarded by a one man war against it by a person who thinks Minolta shammed him, and here it's being said that anyone unsatisfied must be incompetent and unrealistic.

Sad but true. In every debate, people naturally polarize to extremes.
Ivan --

I really liked your reply especially bullet #3 about reading the
manual WITH the camera in hand. How can one expect to learn --
really learn -- the functions without first sitting down and
experimenting with them?
Thanks, I've spent a lot of time with my D5 (my 2nd digtal camera)
and think I'm getting the hang of it :-)

You'd be surprised how many people think ALL they should have to do
is pay $1000.00 and point and shoot a digital camera (without
reading the manual of course) AND instantly it'll make them a world
renowned National Geographic type photographer over night.

And if it DOESN'T, then why there MUST be something WRONG with the
camera, or at LEAST a conspiracy from the manufacture to rip them
off....

Sad but true....
  • Ivan
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top