Maxwell Smart
Senior Member
Seeking a software update, I've been sampling the currently available low-cost photo editing programs; Adobe Photoshop Elements 6, Corel Paint Shop Pro X2, ACDSee Photo Editor 4.0, Picasa 2.7, GIMP 2.4 and Corel PhotoImpact X3.
As a test, I did my best to quickly adjust a single photo in each of the above programs and then compared the resulting outputs from each. Picasa was impressively easy to use and yet also produced the best-looking result in my limited trial. (I know, I know - after mastering the learning curve of PSE6, I'm sure it could have given the best results but that requires more time than I have.) ACDSee 10 Photo Manager ($50) was my favorite organizer of those I tried but I think Picasa's organizer is nearly as good for free. Slick as it is, Picasa 2.7 lacks the advanced tools necessary for major photo retouching - items like brushes and cloning tools, etc - so I still need an updated full-fledged photo editor for the 10% of my editing that requires more than basic tools.
I had great expectations of PSE6 which is a whopping 462MB download but I was surprised to find it missing key features that I don't want to do without. Specifically; correction of Chromatic Aberrations and correction of lens distortion. Of the programs I tried above, as far as I could tell, amazingly only Corel PhotoImpact X3 has tools to correct Chromatic Aberrations and lens distortions. Am I missing something? I looked in Help and found nothing on either subject in the other programs.
Adobe Photoshop Elements 6 seems to be a de facto standard in low cost photo editors yet it's missing key features that I think are essential (see above). Corel PhotoImpact X3 is cheaper and one-third the size yet it has what I need. That might be the end of the story but I'm also skeptical about buying a program so few people endorse. Okay, a program NO ONE endorses. Not sure why although, from what I've read, like Ulead's earlier versions of PhotoImpact, Corel's support stinks. Plus, unless sales of PhotoImpact pick up - which seems unlikely - it may not be around much longer. Heck, I don't see how Corel itself stays in business let alone them buying Ulead 18-months ago. But I digress....
Do the experts here think I'd be foolish to spend $70 for Corel PhotoImpact X3 even if it seems to fit my requirements?
--
Group Captain Mandrake: 'I was tortured by the Japanese, Jack, if you must know; not a pretty story....Strange thing is they make such bloody good cameras.' (Dr. Strangelove, 1964)
As a test, I did my best to quickly adjust a single photo in each of the above programs and then compared the resulting outputs from each. Picasa was impressively easy to use and yet also produced the best-looking result in my limited trial. (I know, I know - after mastering the learning curve of PSE6, I'm sure it could have given the best results but that requires more time than I have.) ACDSee 10 Photo Manager ($50) was my favorite organizer of those I tried but I think Picasa's organizer is nearly as good for free. Slick as it is, Picasa 2.7 lacks the advanced tools necessary for major photo retouching - items like brushes and cloning tools, etc - so I still need an updated full-fledged photo editor for the 10% of my editing that requires more than basic tools.
I had great expectations of PSE6 which is a whopping 462MB download but I was surprised to find it missing key features that I don't want to do without. Specifically; correction of Chromatic Aberrations and correction of lens distortion. Of the programs I tried above, as far as I could tell, amazingly only Corel PhotoImpact X3 has tools to correct Chromatic Aberrations and lens distortions. Am I missing something? I looked in Help and found nothing on either subject in the other programs.
Adobe Photoshop Elements 6 seems to be a de facto standard in low cost photo editors yet it's missing key features that I think are essential (see above). Corel PhotoImpact X3 is cheaper and one-third the size yet it has what I need. That might be the end of the story but I'm also skeptical about buying a program so few people endorse. Okay, a program NO ONE endorses. Not sure why although, from what I've read, like Ulead's earlier versions of PhotoImpact, Corel's support stinks. Plus, unless sales of PhotoImpact pick up - which seems unlikely - it may not be around much longer. Heck, I don't see how Corel itself stays in business let alone them buying Ulead 18-months ago. But I digress....
Do the experts here think I'd be foolish to spend $70 for Corel PhotoImpact X3 even if it seems to fit my requirements?
--
Group Captain Mandrake: 'I was tortured by the Japanese, Jack, if you must know; not a pretty story....Strange thing is they make such bloody good cameras.' (Dr. Strangelove, 1964)