But if you offer a 'product' that does involve photography as
completely FREE they can't require a free product to be taxible can
they?
The SC Tax office told me that they consider photography "manufacturing".
ANYTHING you do is working towards the final product (a print) - so they required you to tax everything.
One of the long-time professionals I talked to said that at one point he contested the tax law. At the time, he was 110% in compliance, not a thing wrong. But, just contesting it had a swarm of tax gestapo goons show up at his place of business and practically tear the place apart trying to find even one dime misplaced somewhere they could bust him on. It's a sad sad thing...
What really clouds the water is the internet though. What if I don't charge my clients
anything at all? I show up and shoot for
free . Then, I let them pay $175 for the first print from Exposuremanager? How the heck do you list
that transaction with the various tax offices?
It's a shame that the code has gotten so difficult to figure out that you could end up paying lawyers and accountants more money that you're planning on making just to get it straight. I'm looking at it from the point of a hobby that could make a couple of hundred a month, and it's almost so complicated that's it's not even worth the trouble.
--
'Not everybody trusts paintings, but people believe photographs.' -- Ansel Adams