I believe it was Pennsylvania's Attorney General brought a law suit
against BB who says got me I will stop but the practice did not stop
so new class action suit! This is how it goes: Customer sees item
on the web for good price, thinks it is the same in the store, it is
not, challenges clerk who sends him to an internal web kiosk. The
item is brought up with the stores higher price. Turns out the web
site is phony in-store-only to get higher price from customer before
he leaves.
--
Bob,
I love these kinds of lawsuits... Best Buy has a web price and a
store price.. pretty common and pretty understandable since the cost
of a store and staff vs a warehouse are different.
Maybe they should have had labled it better as a web only price.
Otherwise that can be seen as a fales ad. And this is pretty
standard law.. of course when you find the price is higher..unless
they pull a gun.. you have choice to walk out... But a false ad does
get people to waste thier time going to the store so this law makes
sense.
but in the end this is what it comes down to...
BestBuy offers an item for a price.
The customer makes a decision.. that the item is worth the price or not
As long as the item sold is what was promised for the price there
was an honest deal.
IF the person wasted time because of the deceptive ad, then they have
a claim. the minute they buy they made a decision and entered into
an agreement.
Not sure why some many want to run home ot mommy goverment because
they get buyers remorse etc.
These days though we have lawsuiits because people are not
accountable...
"Sue Microsoft for selling software online for list price because
other retailers sold it for a discount" HUH? at what point is the
user supposed to be responsible for doing some price shopping and
then being a grown up and honoring thier own deals.
Lots of these tin pot attorney's general just are looking for cash
from deep pockets and headlines.
------------
Ken - Happy A700 Owner
http://www.cascadephotoworks.com