Think about it logically. You have used it only 3 times. If someone
is looking for a used item, they are not going to use it much more
than you.
How can you assume that? Jaja and others used their TCON-300 a
great deal. I believe it totally depends on the buyer. Some
Exx'ers use it a lot. I have back problems, and for me it was just
too heavy to carry around. Otherwise, I know I would have used it
more.
I saw the TCON-300 in some respectable places (like
ecost.com and others) for about $470.
I do see your point - but I just checked ecost, they're charging
$649 plus shipping, PLUS a handling fee. But 17th St. Photo is
selling it for $475 plus S&H. PCMall is $500. So I do hear you.
And I understand that these are new.
If I buy a used item, I am looking for a significant discount (say
at least 30%, 40%), especially if I buy from an individual and not
from a store.
I've had the E10 for about a year and for sometime I thought about
the TCON-300 (I have the 1.4X and 0.8X and the Macro). Now I
changed my mind because all of the 6MP new Digital SLRs for 2K or
less, so I will probably switch over in about 6 months to the Nikon
D100 or Canon D60.
Also you can get on E-bay a 2X professional convertor for about
$150 - OK it is only going to be f/4.0 Vs. the f/2.8 of the 300,
but it is a good price.
Try E-bay and I hope you get a good price. In my opinion the
TCON-300 used would be worth not more than $350.
I think what's probably most pertinent is what prices the TCON-300
and SA2 have fetched recently on Ebay. Just this month two used
TCON-300s have sold for $450 and $452. An SA2 went for $91. I
said that "I'd like to get $600" and at that price I'd include
shipping. So I don't think I'm far off the mark for an "asking"
price. I'd always be willing to negotiate, since listing on ebay
does incur a small expense and a small effort. Plus ebay is still
an unknown, no matter what prices have been recently. People here
at least have some sense of who I am - I think that's a plus? [g]
At any rate, this is my thinking. Thanks for your response Jack.
Best,
Laurie