olyflyer
Forum Pro
Exactly. FC LED and beep is what should be number one, and very simple fix. There is no point to have IS if your image is OOF, so without focus, IS is nothing to have. Also, there are much more people who would benefit from FC LED / beep. Olympus, being a medical company should have realized that problem a long time ago. There are no cons in the FC LED solution, only pros. Making a firmware IS solution is just too complicated, an adapter is the only way to solve that professionally. That way, those who want, can get it. In a menu driven firmware solution it's never going to be real good and flexible, IMO just waste of effort.The discussion with Olympus, and their promise to look into the
matter to Brian Mosley and others, was about Manual Focus
Confirmation for other imaging situations than using current 4:3rd
mount lenses.
As I took some pains to explain, and Olympus seems to have
acknowledged, this is not just for legacy lenses, but also
photography through microscopes, endoscopes and other special imaging
devices (many of which could use the OM mount, btw.).
There are also the OM auto-bellows, the comprehensive series of OM
macrophoto "heads" and a few very high quality --and price--Olympus
superfast telephoto lenses like the 250 f2 (which Olympus still touts
as one of its optical triumphs) for all of which they seem to agree
their is no current equivalent or replacement. On top of that, there
are astronomical, birding and multi-use conventional and mirror
lenses. including Ol'ys own, for which this would be useful.
I do think that it is important to keep reminding Olympus of all of
these potential uses for which manual focus confirmation would be
useful.
BUT it is probably unwise and impolitic to link this with IS, which
would be of limited benefit for many of these applications, and, more
importantly, may open the whole can of worms that those much more
expert than I have mentioned.
After all, there's always the "Dandelion" ...but does it work???
--
http://www.olyflyer.blogspot.com/