Tell me that D300 is tack sharp...

You'll be fine... The camera is great. Do not worry...
Those are really sharp.

Thanks !
Hope that with my set of lens (Tamron 17-50, Nikon 35 2.0, 28-105
macro, 50 mm 1.4) to be able to achieve same level of sharpness.

Reddust
--
Rich Lanthier
Having fun with photos. Nikon Newbie (~ 3 months).
A little searching can go a long way (if the search is up!).

 
Great shot, Mario. Any EXIF information like camera and ISO, as well as lens?

Thank, Alan
 
My new D300 is actually much sharper than a tack. Seriously you will not be disappointed with the image quality of the D300 . It is superb. High iso much better than D200. Also lighter , better AF ,faster FPS. A major upgrade over the D200 in every respect. BUY ONE!!! Steve P
 
At default settings (standard picture control w/ sharpness set to 3), I find it's too sharp - oversharpened for some things, actually, so if you see a sample of a d300 that's too soft, it's the photographer who messed up.

The D300 is not a perfect camera, but being soft is absolutely without any question NOT one of it's flaws...

-m
 
My sample is tack sharp. But the default in camera sharpening is on the soft side - 3 on a scale from 0 to 9 - in the sharpening menues. That is simply a matter of turning up the in camera sharpening. For my taste 9 is too much, but 5-6 works OK for me for most purposes, if I don't intend to PP apart from distorsion correction. If I expect to do PP later I will set the in camera sharpening more conservatively and then sharpen later, when the other tweaks have been done on the computer.

Before the D300 came out many people claimed that the 18-200 lens would be useless on the D300, because it wasn't as sharp as first rate primes and pro zooms. Well, with the D300 my 18-200 is considerably sharper than on my D100 that preceded it, though I can also see that the D300 has resolving capabilities beyond what the 18-200 can deliver. But I have to look at 100% or sometimes even 200% pics to see that at all. That goes for JPEGs out of the camera, whereas I used RAW exclusively on the D100. Carefully PPed RAWs out of the D300 may likely yield even better results, but I haven't done that much, because Capture NX works hopelessly slow on my computer (I used to use Bibble, but it haven't come with D300 support yet).

When talking about sharpness there is a delicate balance between sharpening and noise reduction. There are no hard and fast rules here, it's a matter of personal taste.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top