Robert Hoffman
Senior Member
Can anyone tell me if this program will rotate in lossless fashion, without
reducing the file size?
Thank you.
Robert Hoffman
reducing the file size?
Thank you.
Robert Hoffman
-
Welcome to the new forums! Please read this first. For known issues we are working to resolve, click here.
ACDSee Classic
- Thread starter Robert Hoffman
- Start date
Indeed it does. I've been using ACDSee Classic mainly for its HTML Album Generator plug-in, but I also occassionally use the JPEG rotation feature. Witout quality-loss!
-Anders
As Anders says, yes, it does. The more I upgrade to versions 3 and 4, the more I go back to version 2.43 -- the "classic" graphics viewer.
Give it a try -- there's a trial download at
http://www.acdsystems.com/English/Products/Downloads/ACDSeeClassic.htm?LAN=English
Don
Stipica Grgic
Member
Yes, I completely agree. Especially combination BreezeDowloader & ACDSee Classic. Almost all that I need.
Stipica
Stipica
graph (g3)
Senior Member
im now using ACDSEE classic after having slowdowns on the 3.1 version. it doesnt have HTML generate but how many times do you really generate html? 3.1 have slowdowns on creating new folder, renaming, deleting, refreshing and browsing. i cleaned the cache but still slow..might be my pc but classic is blazing fast now.
Yes, it does. You will have to set the default option to the best quality before you rotate. It can be set when you do save as and the dialog comes up, then click on Options and slide the bar all the way to right (best quality.
Hope this helps.
Hope this helps.
Robert Hoffman
Senior Member
My friend and I rotated a .jpg today with ACDSee 3.1, using the highest
quality(slider all the way to the right). The 28kb file ended up as 55k! It
also suffered some quality loss(brightness loss). I don't know why the
quality would change when the slider was at the highest setting.
Looks like Classic is the way to go. Thanks for the assistance.
Robert Hoffman
quality(slider all the way to the right). The 28kb file ended up as 55k! It
also suffered some quality loss(brightness loss). I don't know why the
quality would change when the slider was at the highest setting.
Looks like Classic is the way to go. Thanks for the assistance.
Robert Hoffman
Did you use Tools - JPEG transform in 3.1???
you get a window 'lossless JPG transformation' with NO slider.
Drawback: I can NOT use this with my Canon G2 files :-((
Marcel.
you get a window 'lossless JPG transformation' with NO slider.
Drawback: I can NOT use this with my Canon G2 files :-((
Marcel.
Keyboard shortcuts
- f
- Forum