Reading mode: Light Dark

D200 - six ISO 1600 images

Go to last post
I like the first and last photos the best. The last, with fill flash, looks very good to me, with good color and catch light in the eyes.

--
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/root
 
Nothing wrong with those. I love the last one. Dave
--
please visit my gallery at http://www.poperotzy.smugmug.com
There is a link for saving on your own Smugmug account.

 
Some nice shots. Congratulations.
And yes, in the right hands D200 can do fine @ high iso as well...
--
Kindest regards,
Stany
I prefer one really good picture in a day over 10 bad ones in a second...

http://www.fotografie.fr/
 
Beautiful kids in nice compositions with nice exposures.

The focus in almost every case seems to be on their jackets. They will be improved with focus on the eyes.
 
PaulDickson said:
Nice shots, however ...

...unless you show the images at 100% size, it proves very little
about noise performance.

Cheers

Paul
Click to expand...
I think these would make fine looking prints to hang on the wall (up to 8 x 10), which is what matters. You are correct in that the noise would be bad for poster size prints...
 
Really not much of a test (if it was intended to be). Taking a picture in good light at ISO 1600 is going to produce much better results than in terrible incandescent light. IMO, that's where the D200 isn't up to the task as much as the competition.
 
Elixir said:
Really not much of a test (if it was intended to be). Taking a
picture in good light at ISO 1600 is going to produce much better
results than in terrible incandescent light. IMO, that's where the
D200 isn't up to the task as much as the competition.
Click to expand...
And what makes you think that it was good light? Or did you mean natural light? I would think he would dial it to ISO 1600 because the lighting situation dictated it.
--
Scott A.
 
S.A. said:
And what makes you think that it was good light? Or did you mean
natural light? I would think he would dial it to ISO 1600 because the
lighting situation dictated it.
Click to expand...
Judging from the background and various other clues, it looks like good light that wouldn't require 1600, if even 400, for that matter.

Still, tough directional artificial light with lots of shadow... that's tough for the D200. Stuff like this isn't so difficult.
 
1/90 f5 1600 ISO is sort of low light.

You need to look at speed, focal length, f stop and 1600 to get the exposure is sort of low.
1/10 sec and iso 200 is sort of low light. Let along hand holding the camera.
Elixir said:
S.A. said:
And what makes you think that it was good light? Or did you mean
natural light? I would think he would dial it to ISO 1600 because the
lighting situation dictated it.
Click to expand...
Judging from the background and various other clues, it looks like
good light that wouldn't require 1600, if even 400, for that matter.

Still, tough directional artificial light with lots of shadow...
that's tough for the D200. Stuff like this isn't so difficult.
Click to expand...
--

Everything happens for a reason. #1 reason: poor planning
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top