Gull wing distorsion at wide angle

John:

Most wide angle lenses have a small amount of gull-wing type distortion as it is usually a better compromise than having pure barrel distortion. On Nikon DSLRs I have several lenses that show it to varying degrees: 17-35 at 17mm, 24-85 at 24-28mm, 15mm prime lens, 20mm prime lens, and some others.

Panorama Tools is superb for correcting this type of distortion because it gives you several different coefficients to play with:
http://www.caldwellphotographic.com/TutorialsDistortionAndColorFringing.html
http://www.caldwellphotographic.com/cc02485at24.html
http://www.caldwellphotographic.com/cc15mm35.html
http://www.caldwellphotographic.com/cc20mm28.html

Brian
Users of zoom lenses with a 28 mm focal length, have you
experienced any such irregular gull wing distorsion at wide angle
with your DSLR? Any remedy or workaround for that?
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1024&message=1452386

Regards
John
--J. Brian Caldwellwww.caldwellphotographic.com
 
Thank you very much for the links. I had a look, but have not studied them yet. The corrections are for specific Nikon lenses. How about the Minolta D7's distorsion in the link I posted?

Regards
John
Panorama Tools is superb for correcting this type of distortion
because it gives you several different coefficients to play with:
http://www.caldwellphotographic.com/TutorialsDistortionAndColorFringing.html
http://www.caldwellphotographic.com/cc02485at24.html
http://www.caldwellphotographic.com/cc15mm35.html
http://www.caldwellphotographic.com/cc20mm28.html

Brian
Users of zoom lenses with a 28 mm focal length, have you
experienced any such irregular gull wing distorsion at wide angle
with your DSLR? Any remedy or workaround for that?
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1024&message=1452386

Regards
John
--
J. Brian Caldwell
http://www.caldwellphotographic.com
 
Panorama Tools are great but only if you have an unlimited time to work out the settings. The wavy lines change depending on the zoom setting making Panorama Tools a real chore. Iknow, I still have all the repeatable tables that I calculated for my Nikon 950/990. A better solution for Chroma and Barrel is here. http://www.theimagingfactory.com/

I have the Debarrelizer and it corrects barrel distortion and Chroma with an instant enlargable preview. I believe they let you download the software and give you a 30 day free preview. The gull wing/ tilde distortion is to be avoided in your shots and I would not take the time to try to get rid of the waves.
Rinus
 
Unfortunately wave distorsion cannot be corrected by Debarrelizer. See their reply below.

Oscar Rysdyk,

///////////////////////////////// http://www.theimagingfactory.com /////////////////////////////////

What would have been nice would be the possibility to disable the in-camera correction of distorsion, and correct them with software (Debarrelizer for example) which would be much easier. Wawe like distorsions would be avoided I believe.

Regards
John
Panorama Tools are great but only if you have an unlimited time to
work out the settings. The wavy lines change depending on the zoom
setting making Panorama Tools a real chore. Iknow, I still have all
the repeatable tables that I calculated for my Nikon 950/990. A
better solution for Chroma and Barrel is
here. http://www.theimagingfactory.com/
I have the Debarrelizer and it corrects barrel distortion and
Chroma with an instant enlargable preview. I believe they let you
download the software and give you a 30 day free preview. The gull
wing/ tilde distortion is to be avoided in your shots and I would
not take the time to try to get rid of the waves.
Rinus
 
John:

Are those full frame shots, or are they cropped at all. I get reasonable correction in those D7 images by setting the "a" coefficients to +0.04, the "b" coefficients to -0.09, and the "d" coefficients to +1.05. This gets rid of most of the distortion, but there seems to be some assymetry. By the way, thats probably the worst case of gull wing distortion I've ever seen!

Brian
picture and i am afraid this is beyond the capabilities of
Debarrelizer. This type of distortion can only be corrected (if at
all) with Helmut Derschl pano tools, or possibly with LensDoc.

Oscar Rysdyk,
///////////////////////////////// http://www.theimagingfactory.com
/////////////////////////////////

What would have been nice would be the possibility to disable the
in-camera correction of distorsion, and correct them with software
(Debarrelizer for example) which would be much easier. Wawe like
distorsions would be avoided I believe.

Regards
John
Panorama Tools are great but only if you have an unlimited time to
work out the settings. The wavy lines change depending on the zoom
setting making Panorama Tools a real chore. Iknow, I still have all
the repeatable tables that I calculated for my Nikon 950/990. A
better solution for Chroma and Barrel is
here. http://www.theimagingfactory.com/
I have the Debarrelizer and it corrects barrel distortion and
Chroma with an instant enlargable preview. I believe they let you
download the software and give you a 30 day free preview. The gull
wing/ tilde distortion is to be avoided in your shots and I would
not take the time to try to get rid of the waves.
Rinus
--J. Brian Caldwellwww.caldwellphotographic.com
 
Brian, thank you for your reply.

Have you tried to correct the distorsion in the picture from the link I posted? I am curious to see the result. BTW, I don't know if the top image has been cropped. The image is from a D7 owner. Would you recommend the camera (D7) for architectural photography? Is the Nikon 5000 better for that?

Best Regards
John
John:
Are those full frame shots, or are they cropped at all. I get
reasonable correction in those D7 images by setting the "a"
coefficients to +0.04, the "b" coefficients to -0.09, and the "d"
coefficients to +1.05. This gets rid of most of the distortion,
but there seems to be some assymetry. By the way, thats probably
the worst case of gull wing distortion I've ever seen!

Brian
 
John:

Yes, I used the images you linked to. To see the result use the Panorama Tools plugin with the coefficients I mentioned. Panorama Tools is free. As I mentioned before, this is the worst example of gull-wing distortion I've ever seen. Also, there seems to be an assymetry that might be due to the sensor being displaced from the optical axis of the lens. This will require a separate shift operation prior to using the radial correction in order to get perfect correction.

I've tried a CP5000 for a short time, and it seems like a pretty decent camera. I did shoot some test images for distortion, and it seems to be simple barrel at the short focal length end with little or no gull wing. You can also get down to 19mm equivalent on the Coolpix using a 0.68x converter. If it were me, I'd probably go with the Nikon over the Minolta for architectural photography.

Brian
Best Regards
John
John:
Are those full frame shots, or are they cropped at all. I get
reasonable correction in those D7 images by setting the "a"
coefficients to +0.04, the "b" coefficients to -0.09, and the "d"
coefficients to +1.05. This gets rid of most of the distortion,
but there seems to be some assymetry. By the way, thats probably
the worst case of gull wing distortion I've ever seen!

Brian
--J. Brian Caldwellwww.caldwellphotographic.com
 
Brian,
Thank you very much for so much valuable information

Best Regards
John
I've tried a CP5000 for a short time, and it seems like a pretty
decent camera. I did shoot some test images for distortion, and it
seems to be simple barrel at the short focal length end with little
or no gull wing. You can also get down to 19mm equivalent on the
Coolpix using a 0.68x converter. If it were me, I'd probably go
with the Nikon over the Minolta for architectural photography.

Brian
Best Regards
John
John:
Are those full frame shots, or are they cropped at all. I get
reasonable correction in those D7 images by setting the "a"
coefficients to +0.04, the "b" coefficients to -0.09, and the "d"
coefficients to +1.05. This gets rid of most of the distortion,
but there seems to be some assymetry. By the way, thats probably
the worst case of gull wing distortion I've ever seen!

Brian
--
J. Brian Caldwell
http://www.caldwellphotographic.com
 
What a problem this little thing can be. But your minolta lens is not the only one, the 17mm Tamron lens has it too. This shows you that the effect is totally in the lens. I already knew that the debarrelizer does not get rid of the wavies but I think it is a lot easier to only correct for the barrel distortion which is the center 3/4 part and then go to the panorama tools to get rid of the remaining pincushion distortion at in he corners. The Debarrelizer is fast and easy to use and will correct for the Chroma in one sweep without using formulas. It is fast for any zoom setting. If you then must use the panorama tools, you only have to set a single parameter to get rid of the remaining pin at the corners.
Rinus
 
I have a 990 and the WC-E24 (0.66x) wide converter has a lot of barrel distortion but the debarrelizer can correct it. The WC-E63 (0.63x) or the WC-E68 (0.68x) may also have gull wing distortion. I bought the older one of these two (sorry I do not remember which) and found the same wavies. I went back to the older WC-E24 and use the debarrelizer. I would test them on some straight lines and return it if it is not going to do the trick!.
Rinus
 
Rinus:

Calibrating a lens for distortion (and color fringing) should be a one-time only process. You do it once for a particular focal length and then re-load the corrections whenever you need to. In this scenario it would be cumbersome to have to go through a two-stage process using the Photoshop de-barrelizer. Panorama Tools is not rocket science!

Brian
What a problem this little thing can be. But your minolta lens is
not the only one, the 17mm Tamron lens has it too. This shows you
that the effect is totally in the lens. I already knew that the
debarrelizer does not get rid of the wavies but I think it is a lot
easier to only correct for the barrel distortion which is the
center 3/4 part and then go to the panorama tools to get rid of the
remaining pincushion distortion at in he corners. The Debarrelizer
is fast and easy to use and will correct for the Chroma in one
sweep without using formulas. It is fast for any zoom setting. If
you then must use the panorama tools, you only have to set a single
parameter to get rid of the remaining pin at the corners.
Rinus
 
Rinus:

I would test on some straight lines and return it only if there is non-rotational symmetry due to a misplaced sensor. Everything else can and should be corrected.

Brian
I have a 990 and the WC-E24 (0.66x) wide converter has a lot of
barrel distortion but the debarrelizer can correct it. The WC-E63
(0.63x) or the WC-E68 (0.68x) may also have gull wing distortion. I
bought the older one of these two (sorry I do not remember which)
and found the same wavies. I went back to the older WC-E24 and use
the debarrelizer. I would test them on some straight lines and
return it if it is not going to do the trick!.
Rinus
 
Hi John:

I found some grid images by Marko Bjorkroth, and he gave me permission to post these images along with the corrected versions. I used Panorama Tools to fix the distortion at 28mm, 35mm, 50mm, 100mm, 150mm, and 200mm. http://www.caldwellphotographic.com/D7Distortion.html

Brian
Users of zoom lenses with a 28 mm focal length, have you
experienced any such irregular gull wing distorsion at wide angle
with your DSLR? Any remedy or workaround for that?
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1024&message=1452386

Regards
John
 
Hi Brian,

After much thought and your precious advice, I have decided to buy the CP 5000 & the 19 mm converter lens. If you have studied the CP 5000, could you post the " Complete Set of Correction Coefficients" for the CP 5000 if you have it and if ...that's is not asking for too much.

Besr Regards
John
I've tried a CP5000 for a short time, and it seems like a pretty
decent camera. I did shoot some test images for distortion, and it
seems to be simple barrel at the short focal length end with little
or no gull wing. You can also get down to 19mm equivalent on the
Coolpix using a 0.68x converter. If it were me, I'd probably go
with the Nikon over the Minolta for architectural photography.

Brian
 
John:

Without proper test images there's not much I can do. You might want to try stepping through my tutorial to do the calibration yourself. Once you get the hang of it its really pretty straightforward.

Brian
Besr Regards
John
I've tried a CP5000 for a short time, and it seems like a pretty
decent camera. I did shoot some test images for distortion, and it
seems to be simple barrel at the short focal length end with little
or no gull wing. You can also get down to 19mm equivalent on the
Coolpix using a 0.68x converter. If it were me, I'd probably go
with the Nikon over the Minolta for architectural photography.

Brian
--
J. Brian Caldwell
http://www.caldwellphotographic.com
 
Brian,

I'll give it a try.
Thanks again.

John
John:
Without proper test images there's not much I can do. You might
want to try stepping through my tutorial to do the calibration
yourself. Once you get the hang of it its really pretty
straightforward.

Brian
 
Panorama Tools is great if you only left that zoom control alone. I do not shoot at any particular zoom setting as that removes the benefit of having one. Recalculating is a pain in the butt. I have all the tables calculated for Pan Tools at all the normal ranges. Wide,Tele, middle needs none except some fringing. Wide with the adapter as well even the chroma settings on my 180 degree fisheye. So much for having zoom lenses with fixed settings. As far as the Debarrelizer goes, you probably did not try it out as it will do both chroma/fringing and barrel distortion in one click. You can also scale the image to the horizontal or vertical straight edge full crop as well as replicate/fill the empty areas or leave it all alone and let you do the crop after. Granted, Panorama Tools is free but it is only for people with slide rules and calculators. it took me hours to calculate and try all the settings for the Nikon 950 and had to do it again with the 990. Then I used my wide lenses and zooms on my 35mm Nikons and gave up. Downloading settings from somewhere else does not work either due to manufacturing differences in the lenses. The proof is in the Panorama tools help file where the Nikon 950 was used with a wide 24 adapter. The settings were not correct on my system. The chroma was worse and the barrel distortion was still somewhat barreled. Thanks guys for the freebees but I rather pay a little to get a lot more and work fast and efficient.
Rinus
 
Rinus,
I don't mind paying for faster & more efficient work too.
Best Regards
John
Panorama Tools is great if you only left that zoom control alone. I
do not shoot at any particular zoom setting as that removes the
benefit of having one. Recalculating is a pain in the butt. I have
all the tables calculated for Pan Tools at all the normal ranges.
Wide,Tele, middle needs none except some fringing. Wide with the
adapter as well even the chroma settings on my 180 degree fisheye.
So much for having zoom lenses with fixed settings. As far as the
Debarrelizer goes, you probably did not try it out as it will do
both chroma/fringing and barrel distortion in one click. You can
also scale the image to the horizontal or vertical straight edge
full crop as well as replicate/fill the empty areas or leave it all
alone and let you do the crop after. Granted, Panorama Tools is
free but it is only for people with slide rules and calculators. it
took me hours to calculate and try all the settings for the Nikon
950 and had to do it again with the 990. Then I used my wide lenses
and zooms on my 35mm Nikons and gave up. Downloading settings from
somewhere else does not work either due to manufacturing
differences in the lenses. The proof is in the Panorama tools help
file where the Nikon 950 was used with a wide 24 adapter. The
settings were not correct on my system. The chroma was worse and
the barrel distortion was still somewhat barreled. Thanks guys for
the freebees but I rather pay a little to get a lot more and work
fast and efficient.
Rinus
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top