Monopods

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gary
  • Start date Start date
Gary...

My own experience suggests a monopod buys you about an f stop, not much more. If you can handhold sharply at 1/60th, expect about 1/30th with a monopod. Don't expect miracles, but they're occasionally useful.

Chris Butler
 
'A hook instead of a bolt.'

ANOTHER great idea.

This 'poor mans monopod' just keeps getting better and better!

I will hold off before I make mine, as some more neat ideas might
come in.
You can put a hook on both ends and make a reversable monopod.
Ralph
(I wonder why no-one markets one of these?)

Nigel
I always carry my poorman's monopod. It fits in my pocket. All it
is is a 1/4 inch bolt with a 6 foot string tied to the bolt. Screw
the bolt on the tripod hole of your camera, let the string hang
down, step on the string and pull up on the camera and make the
string tight. Instant monopod!
Ralph
Mention a monopod and look what you get; I’m making a (string ‘o’
pod) right now, thanks Ralph.
If it works, you’ll be able to wrap the string around anything to
anchor it anywhere.
I’m going to use an eye hook for the camera instead of a bolt, so I
can attach a string to a clip for easy on of the camera.

--
Thomas http://www.ycsphoto.com/loading.htm
 
I will hold off before I make mine, as some more neat ideas might
come in.
(I wonder why no-one markets one of these?)
I am selling the all new LightString-Bolt™ Monopod for $19.95, plus $6.95 shipping and handling. But wait there's more... you also get a nut chopper free. Chops nuts, tomatoes, onions (no tears!) in a jiffy. Make your own fresh salsa at home!

Just kidding.

--David
 
At about $70bucks USD its worth the investment. The new D100 (i plan on getting) would look wonderful on it.
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1009&message=1955303
Hi Folks,

I currently use a 990 for pics of baseball games. All shots are
handheld. On bright days no problem. This time of year for high
school games sees many low light situations. I was considering a
monopod to help steady shots at the slower shutter speeds, but was
wondering if those who have experience with monopods feel they are
helpful. I have been looking over the Bogen selection.

Would those with experience please comment. It would seem to me
that it would be helpfull to steady the shot, but maybe not by a
large degree.
Let me know what you think!!

Gary
--cheersZip:P - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -BFS: been there had that...got the t-shirtSticker Status: ON...but on upsidedownPie Chute: UnCorked Lens Cap: No dangle at any angle128mem stick: lostReal Name: Michael C - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
Very droll Ralph !
And one in the middle to make it instantly suitable for small people I suppose!

Nigel
'A hook instead of a bolt.'

ANOTHER great idea.

This 'poor mans monopod' just keeps getting better and better!

I will hold off before I make mine, as some more neat ideas might
come in.
You can put a hook on both ends and make a reversable monopod.
Ralph
(I wonder why no-one markets one of these?)

Nigel
I always carry my poorman's monopod. It fits in my pocket. All it
is is a 1/4 inch bolt with a 6 foot string tied to the bolt. Screw
the bolt on the tripod hole of your camera, let the string hang
down, step on the string and pull up on the camera and make the
string tight. Instant monopod!
Ralph
Mention a monopod and look what you get; I’m making a (string ‘o’
pod) right now, thanks Ralph.
If it works, you’ll be able to wrap the string around anything to
anchor it anywhere.
I’m going to use an eye hook for the camera instead of a bolt, so I
can attach a string to a clip for easy on of the camera.

--
Thomas http://www.ycsphoto.com/loading.htm
 
Well, I just made mine.

As an experiment I tried TWO strings - one under each foot with my feet placed abour 18 inches apart.

A definite improvement in steadiness - (at the expense of complexity).

Now, if only I had three feet . . . .

Nigel
ANOTHER great idea.

This 'poor mans monopod' just keeps getting better and better!

I will hold off before I make mine, as some more neat ideas might
come in.
(I wonder why no-one markets one of these?)

Nigel
I always carry my poorman's monopod. It fits in my pocket. All it
is is a 1/4 inch bolt with a 6 foot string tied to the bolt. Screw
the bolt on the tripod hole of your camera, let the string hang
down, step on the string and pull up on the camera and make the
string tight. Instant monopod!
Ralph
Mention a monopod and look what you get; I’m making a (string ‘o’
pod) right now, thanks Ralph.
If it works, you’ll be able to wrap the string around anything to
anchor it anywhere.
I’m going to use an eye hook for the camera instead of a bolt, so I
can attach a string to a clip for easy on of the camera.

--
Thomas http://www.ycsphoto.com/loading.htm
 
See below:
Well, I just made mine.

As an experiment I tried TWO strings - one under each foot with my
feet placed abour 18 inches apart.

A definite improvement in steadiness - (at the expense of complexity).

Now, if only I had three feet . . . .

Nigel
ANOTHER great idea.

This 'poor mans monopod' just keeps getting better and better!

I will hold off before I make mine, as some more neat ideas might
come in.
(I wonder why no-one markets one of these?)

Nigel
I always carry my poorman's monopod. It fits in my pocket. All it
is is a 1/4 inch bolt with a 6 foot string tied to the bolt. Screw
the bolt on the tripod hole of your camera, let the string hang
down, step on the string and pull up on the camera and make the
string tight. Instant monopod!
Ralph
Mention a monopod and look what you get; I’m making a (string ‘o’
pod) right now, thanks Ralph.
If it works, you’ll be able to wrap the string around anything to
anchor it anywhere.
I’m going to use an eye hook for the camera instead of a bolt, so I
can attach a string to a clip for easy on of the camera.

--
Thomas http://www.ycsphoto.com/loading.htm
 
Well, I took the plunge and got a monopod. (Actually, my wife got me one as a present. :-) ) It's a real deluxe model. I say that because it has a bubble-level, quick-release mount, and extends to 66"! A lot of the ones I was seeing online seemed like they would be too short; I mean, wouldn't you want it to extend to a reasonably comfortable eye-level? I'm sure it's not as light and/or portable as some others...
I have used monopods for many years with SLRs, especially in
situations where tripods are not allowed (like some zoos) or where
What is the reasoning of places not allowing tripods? I think as a practical matter, it's probably annoying to others to set up a tripod and have a crowd of people walking around, potentially tripping over it. At least with a monopod, you're not taking up much, if any, more real-estate (than you would anyways).

I guess my question is, to places that ban tripods actually use that logic and consciously allow monopods? I mean, I could see where some people might look at the monopod and figure that it's the "same thing".
I don't want the extra bulk and weight of a tripod.
This is the big thing for me. If it's not real portable, I just won't use it.
The best way
I've found to steady the monopod is to lean it against something
stable--possibly a tree or a railing.
I think this is a great idea. I also like the idea of the "velcro strips" and strapping it to the occasional chair, etc.
Of course, you have to use a
ball head to keep the camera level when you lean the monopod. It's
not as good as a tripod, but I've found that with a bit of
ingenuity and experimentation, you can use slow shutter speets and
still get sharp pix.
I just hope that I don't have to go through too many contortions to get sharp pics. I would imagine that most of the time, I don't have time to set it up next to something to get super-steady, I just have to take the pic. But I understand what you're getting at -- I think it's a good idea to lean it against something for complete steadying.
Good luck!
 
Gary W.

You appear to have looked at many models, etc. Which did you finally choose (also which head). In the market for one. Thank you for your response.
 
I always carry my poorman's monopod. It fits in my pocket. All it
is is a 1/4 inch bolt with a 6 foot string tied to the bolt. Screw
the bolt on the tripod hole of your camera, let the string hang
down, step on the string and pull up on the camera and make the
string tight. Instant monopod!
Ralph
If you make the string long enough to go under both feet while spread apart there would be more stability.
 
If you make the string long enough to go under both feet while
spread apart there would be more stability.
Just thought of something else.... If you step on the string with 2 feet and in addition wear the neck strap of the camera and push the camera away from you it will have 3 stablity points. Wonder how that would work!
 
Gary W.
You appear to have looked at many models, etc.
No, I didn't! You must be thinking of the other Gary! :-)
Which did you
finally choose (also which head). In the market for one. Thank
you for your response.
It was a Quantaray from Ritz/Wolf Camera. I'm sure it's not as fancy as some that have been posted about in this forum (like, the grip is just hard plastic), but it has more features than I probably need (like the bubble float -- do you really need to know if you're perfectly vertical? You can't even see it with the camera at the normal position!).

The head is a quick-release type, and has a handle, which makes it easy to pan and move around. On the bottom is a foot-rest, for added stability. If I have to hold it with my hand, I still find that it's a bit unstable. (It doesn't eliminate camera shake from side to side, just from up and down, so it's only a partial success.) I like the idea that someone mentioned about using velcro strips to attach the monopod to something else, like a chair. That would make a big difference. Also, I'll have to try using the foot-support, and see how that goes. And if I want to really get crazy, I can use the remote, assuming I get the thing steady.

The best thing about it is that it can reach all the way to my (tall) eye level (and then some), where a lot of the models I was looking at (online) do not. The negative point about it is that it's bulky and heavy enough that I still don't think I'll be taking it just anywhere, but maybe I'll use it more than I would have used a tripod.

--
Gary W.
Nikon 880
 
Gary W.
You appear to have looked at many models, etc.
No, I didn't! You must be thinking of the other Gary! :-)
Which did you
finally choose (also which head). In the market for one. Thank
you for your response.
It was a Quantaray from Ritz/Wolf Camera. I'm sure it's not as
fancy as some that have been posted about in this forum (like, the
grip is just hard plastic), but it has more features than I
probably need (like the bubble float -- do you really need to know
if you're perfectly vertical? You can't even see it with the camera
at the normal position!).

The head is a quick-release type, and has a handle, which makes it
easy to pan and move around. On the bottom is a foot-rest, for
added stability. If I have to hold it with my hand, I still find
that it's a bit unstable. (It doesn't eliminate camera shake from
side to side, just from up and down, so it's only a partial
success.) I like the idea that someone mentioned about using
velcro strips to attach the monopod to something else, like a
chair. That would make a big difference. Also, I'll have to try
using the foot-support, and see how that goes. And if I want to
really get crazy, I can use the remote, assuming I get the thing
steady.

The best thing about it is that it can reach all the way to my
(tall) eye level (and then some), where a lot of the models I was
looking at (online) do not. The negative point about it is that
it's bulky and heavy enough that I still don't think I'll be taking
it just anywhere, but maybe I'll use it more than I would have used
a tripod.

--
Gary W.
Nikon 880
Just keep using the monopod. Before long you'll be amazed how steady you can keep the camera with it, and you'll be wanting to pick it up every time you head out to the park lol. Above all things however, have fun. and post some images now and then so we can enjoy this wonderful hobby with you.
--
JJ
 
Here's my combination, purchased from B&H [ http://www.bhphotovideo.com ]

Davis & Sanford "Trailblazer" Monopod:
  • 4 sections 21" - 68"
  • Flip-Lock Leg Clamps
  • Foam Handle
  • Sipked Leg w/ Plastic Screw-over
  • carry case
  • Wt. = 1lb
  • B&H Cat# DAMPT $24.95
Bogen Swivel Tilt Monopod Head # 3232
  • Supports 5.5lbs
  • Allows easy switch from Portrait to Landscape
  • B&H Cat # BO3232 $13.00
Great combination: Light Weight, Long Extension, Cushioned Grip, Tip works in-doors or out, fast Portrait / Landscape switching.

Gary wrote:
I was considering a
monopod to help steady shots at the slower shutter speeds, but was
wondering if those who have experience with monopods feel they are
helpful. I have been looking over the Bogen selection.

Would those with experience please comment. It would seem to me
that it would be helpfull to steady the shot, but maybe not by a
large degree.
Let me know what you think!!

Gary
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top