D3 and D300 AF modues ARE the same

The focus assist light is to support in dim/bad lighting situations with or wihtout the use of the (on-board flash unit. The D3 has no focus assist light, the D300 has.

Yes, the flash measuring light/focus assist light is infra-red on the SB-600 and 800.
The focus assist light in the D300 is not infra-red

Michel
--
~ Light is eveything ~
http://www.fotopropaganda.com
http://www.pbase.com/photopropaganda
 
Phillip, Did you try the micro focus adjustment with your big Sigma
lens? Wondering if the camera recognizes a 3p lens and gives you
opportunty to record an adjustment that automatically sets up on each
subsequent time you mount that lens.
--
Marabou Muddler
http://mmuddler.smugmug.com/
Hi Marabou no I didn't in all honesty it didn't enter my head as all
the images appear to be sharp the only lens that was a little wonky,
was a ten -year-old nikkor 24-50 that I use for time lapse
photography and that has spent most of its life outside and is a
little wonky on all my bodies.

Unfortunately for me I am still constrained by my NDA which is very
frustrating considering the images and comments posted by other
professionals that have had the opportunity to use these cameras.

I am very impressed with the D300 in fact so impressed that I have
actually cancelled my D3 order in preference for two D300 (of course
I'm fortunate enough to get priority ordering on the NPS scheme) I
will be getting a D3 but not probably until late next year as for my
type of shooting a crop camera is preferable especially with the high
pixel density.

Phillip

--
NPS Member
Thanks for sharing your experience with us Phillip. There has been a lot of FUD campaigns here lately, so it's very relieving to hear your very positive experience with the D300.

Regards
Ole Thorsen
http://www.pbase.com/ole_thorsen
  • OMNISCIENCE
Knowing what
thou knowest not
is in a sense
omniscience.
(Grook by Piet Hein)
 
My bottom line is that I believe the Nikon engineers probably made
the D300 AF as close to the D3 as they could, given their other
constraints such as price and weight, but it won't surprise me or
disappoint me if the D300 is somewhat slower under some conditions. I
don't understand why the paranoia is running so rampant here without
any real quantitative information - we'll know the answers in another
four weeks.
Nicely summed up!!
 
Yes, the flash measuring light/focus assist light is infra-red on the
SB-600 and 800.
No, that's not correct, it's not infrared.

When active these lights throw a (mainly) vertical dark-red/black pattern so the camera's center sensor has some contrast and the camera can set the distance.
 
Yes, the flash measuring light/focus assist light is infra-red on the
SB-600 and 800.
No, that's not correct, it's not infrared.
I always understood that it was infra-red, thank you for correcting me.

I checked the manual of my SB-800 and it is not mentioned that it is infra-red light :-)
When active these lights throw a (mainly) vertical dark-red/black
pattern so the camera's center sensor has some contrast and the
camera can set the distance.
It sounds even more logic than infra-red light :-)
Michel

--
~ Light is eveything ~
http://www.fotopropaganda.com
http://www.pbase.com/photopropaganda
 
Bill, fine with me.....We will see when the revies are in when people with both cameras have a chance to compare. Again Im the first to say I hope Im wrong, but I doubt it. Also I hope Phil will address this issue and compare both for himself than give us the results
In fact, I spoke to a Pro just today who has extensively used both D3
and D300, a Nikon Rep as well, who very plainly stated quite a
different story, that the D300 is significantly faster than the D200,
faster than the D2, and certainly with AF-S lenses they saw no
noticeable difference to the D3.

What does all that prove? Well, that I can find just as many folks
to refute your "impressions", and that is what they are,
"impressions", just another data point, and most certainly not
definitive.

I am certainly not casting aspersions on you, your veracity or your
motives, simply pointing out that others have been reporting quite a
different story. And when I couple that with the insanity it would
take for Nikon to release the D300 with AF that did not at least
match the current D2 series, well, just doesn't pass the "smell test".

The next few weeks will tell for sure.

Now, if you can show me some verifiably proof of the differences
between the DX and FX versions of the module in the performance area,
you might change my mind. Until then, your speculation and
impression is no better than mine.
I tested both cameras extensively at the photo expo and discussed
this subject in great detail with Nikon personnel. I'm not sure
where the original poster got his information, but both the D3 and
D300 use the SAME EXACT autofocus module. Further, I saw no real
difference in autofocus performance. I'm no noob either- I am a pro
sports photographer that uses a D2xs and D200 with many pro lenses,
so I know what I'm looking at.

Those of you that ordered a D300 and are concerned about autofocus
speed need not worry.
--
http://www.screamandfly.com
My Personal Weblog: http://weblog.screamandfly.com
--
Bill Dewey
http://www.deweydrive.com
 
Nikon have said since the launch the modules are identical. This
includes physical size.
Where exactly have they?
Juergen,

I haven't seen it either being mentioned by official Nikon statement (on paper!)

However when I askd the question if the focus system is the same of the D3 and D300, I got the answer that the D3 is faster in focussing, despite using the same modules.

I'm not sure if it is a good comparison, but maybe you can compare it a bit with computer/graphic chips. There are lots of chips similar, but delivering totally diffrent results by small modifications of the chip and what is done with the information produced with the chip.

Michel

--
~ Light is eveything ~
http://www.fotopropaganda.com
http://www.pbase.com/photopropaganda
 
You cant drink first then come and post here.....i'll say it for the LAST time! It was NOT just me!!! can you read??? there were 4 other people who saw the same thin that replied during the last post! I dont care who had both cameras in their hand, the d300's were SLOWER than the d3's AGAIN for the more dense of you, There were 4 other people who were at the show and posted the same results. Now do yourself a favor, save the sarcasm and take a cold shower for god sakes.
Thanks for chiming in Philip. For some strange reason it is the
experience of folks like yourself, who have actually had the
opportunity for real world use, that I put more stock in.

What is very encouraging to me as well, but not surprising after the
D200 situation, is that Nikon kept things correct for the Sigma
lenses.
While the couple of days I had both cameras I couldn't see any
difference in focus speed with AFS/AFI/HSM lenses the HSM lens was
particularly important for me as I use the sigma f5.6 800 prime a lot
the d300 seemed both faster and more accurate than my d2x d200 D1x
and a few other Nikon digital bodies I have.

Phillip.

Ps from what I was told both be focusing modules are exactly the same
the only difference is the housing that they are fitted into one
housing for the 35mm sensor one housing for the cropped sensor.

--
NPS Member

One's life is not measured by the two dates upon your tombstone, but
how you lived the dash in between them
--
Bill Dewey
http://www.deweydrive.com
 
If BOTH sensors are the SAME then why put a focus assist on one and NOT the other?????
The focus assist light is to support in dim/bad lighting situations
with or wihtout the use of the (on-board flash unit. The D3 has no
focus assist light, the D300 has.

Yes, the flash measuring light/focus assist light is infra-red on the
SB-600 and 800.
The focus assist light in the D300 is not infra-red

Michel
--
~ Light is eveything ~
http://www.fotopropaganda.com
http://www.pbase.com/photopropaganda
 
Insulting people is only going to make it worse. Maybe you saw what you say, maybe not. Maybe 4 other people agree with you, maybe not. There are lots of other people that disagree with you, several of whom are well respected members of this and other sites. For example, I would take the post linked below, as carrying significantly more weight than yours. But, the bottom line is that the camera is a month out. We'll know, for sure, when the cameras are released, what the respective levels of performance will be. Until then, continually posting a bunch of unconfirmed, negative and disputed comments looks a lot more like FUD than than anything else.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1039&message=25310408
You cant drink first then come and post here.....i'll say it for the
LAST time! It was NOT just me!!! can you read??? there were 4
other people who saw the same thin that replied during the last post!
I dont care who had both cameras in their hand, the d300's were
SLOWER than the d3's AGAIN for the more dense of you, There were 4
other people who were at the show and posted the same results. Now
do yourself a favor, save the sarcasm and take a cold shower for god
sakes.
--
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/root
 
Umm, because there's a flash on the d300, too, and maybe Nikon thought some flash situations might be low-light? Ya think?
If BOTH sensors are the SAME then why put a focus assist on one and
NOT the other?????
 
OK so here is the fifth person that saw/ heard something about the d3 being faster than the d300!!! So AGAIN, it was NOT just me!! Im only one guy at the booth for 3 hours trying to help out with my observations, and to boot, I have bill calling me chicken little! lol, come on give me a break, if i were the only one id expect you guys to blast me, but im not, so please lets try (if we care) to get some clarification as to why now 6 of us, have experienced this? My pro buddy has a call into nikon since he uses their stuff and evaluates for them too.....If I find out i'll post.
Nikon have said since the launch the modules are identical. This
includes physical size.
Where exactly have they?
Juergen,

I haven't seen it either being mentioned by official Nikon statement
(on paper!)
However when I askd the question if the focus system is the same of
the D3 and D300, I got the answer that the D3 is faster in focussing,
despite using the same modules.

I'm not sure if it is a good comparison, but maybe you can compare it
a bit with computer/graphic chips. There are lots of chips similar,
but delivering totally diffrent results by small modifications of the
chip and what is done with the information produced with the chip.

Michel

--
~ Light is eveything ~
http://www.fotopropaganda.com
http://www.pbase.com/photopropaganda
 
If BOTH sensors are the SAME then why put a focus assist on one and
NOT the other?????
Have you tried to focus in total darkness, when you want to use a flash?

The D300 has build-in flash, and the focus assist is needed for flash photography in total darkness. The D3 doesn't have build-in flash, and when using a SB-800 flash which has the red focus assist light included you can focus in total darkness.

Did you hope for or assume other reasons?

Regards
Ole Thorsen
http://www.pbase.com/ole_thorsen
  • OMNISCIENCE
Knowing what
thou knowest not
is in a sense
omniscience.
(Grook by Piet Hein)
 
Just wondering how you responded to this quote??
D300 use the SAME EXACT autofocus module.
Indeed, indeed sharing the same module. However the Nikonman in Osaka
stated that the D3 focusses quicker than the D300, there is more than
only the focus module. Well I'm not a sports shooter, I can be wrong
of course. Just wondering if the Nikonman was also wrong :-) Besides
this I did not try out the D300, just hold it. The D3 however I can
state clearly that focussing is very very fast and acurate.
Those of you that ordered a D300 and are concerned about autofocus
speed need not worry.
I ordered a D3, however I heard that the D300 focus speed is similar
to that of the D200, which is not bad at all.

Michel
~ Light is eveything ~
http://www.fotopropaganda.com
http://www.pbase.com/photopropaganda
 
OK so here is the fifth person that saw/ heard something about the d3
being faster than the d300!!! So AGAIN, it was NOT just me!! Im
only one guy at the booth for 3 hours trying to help out with my
observations, and to boot, I have bill calling me chicken little!
lol, come on give me a break, if i were the only one id expect you
guys to blast me, but im not, so please lets try (if we care) to get
some clarification as to why now 6 of us, have experienced this? My
pro buddy has a call into nikon since he uses their stuff and
evaluates for them too.....If I find out i'll post.
You have to admit that there's grounds for skepticism about your knowledge and bias when in your first post you note that the rep claimed that the bigger sensor in the D3 accounted for the difference, you don't know why there'd be a focus assist lamp on the D300 but not the D3 (ouch!) and you openly admit to wanting "to make love to a 1DsII"!

Personally, I accept that you were honestly recounting your experience at the show. I'm skeptical of the value of your observation given the preproduction nature of the cameras you used and the clueless guidance you were given by the rep, but it could turn out that you're right. It also could turn out that several well-established posters here who have the opposite experience could turn out to be wrong.

We'll know more soon enough.
--
My photos: http://www.pbase.com/imageiseverything/root
 
I only respond like that when a sarcastic attitude is throw my way.....By the way 2 more people spotted the same thing....read some of the latest posts in here.....seems that nikonman in osaka had mentioned something similar. I know we all have to wait but it ticks me off when people are making it sound like its only me that saw this!
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1039&message=25310408
You cant drink first then come and post here.....i'll say it for the
LAST time! It was NOT just me!!! can you read??? there were 4
other people who saw the same thin that replied during the last post!
I dont care who had both cameras in their hand, the d300's were
SLOWER than the d3's AGAIN for the more dense of you, There were 4
other people who were at the show and posted the same results. Now
do yourself a favor, save the sarcasm and take a cold shower for god
sakes.
--
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/root
 
I agree totally....and get this. since I have no idea why one was faster than the other the rep probally spoke out of his a$$ but i had caught him off guard when i handed the camera to him and put him on the spot.....but again, just so I can sleep...lol There were more than a few people who posted here that saw the same thing....Im the one though who has been more vocal about it.....
OK so here is the fifth person that saw/ heard something about the d3
being faster than the d300!!! So AGAIN, it was NOT just me!! Im
only one guy at the booth for 3 hours trying to help out with my
observations, and to boot, I have bill calling me chicken little!
lol, come on give me a break, if i were the only one id expect you
guys to blast me, but im not, so please lets try (if we care) to get
some clarification as to why now 6 of us, have experienced this? My
pro buddy has a call into nikon since he uses their stuff and
evaluates for them too.....If I find out i'll post.
You have to admit that there's grounds for skepticism about your
knowledge and bias when in your first post you note that the rep
claimed that the bigger sensor in the D3 accounted for the
difference, you don't know why there'd be a focus assist lamp on the
D300 but not the D3 (ouch!) and you openly admit to wanting "to make
love to a 1DsII"!

Personally, I accept that you were honestly recounting your
experience at the show. I'm skeptical of the value of your
observation given the preproduction nature of the cameras you used
and the clueless guidance you were given by the rep, but it could
turn out that you're right. It also could turn out that several
well-established posters here who have the opposite experience could
turn out to be wrong.

We'll know more soon enough.
--
My photos: http://www.pbase.com/imageiseverything/root
 
I agree totally....and get this. since I have no idea why one was
faster than the other the rep probally spoke out of his a$$ but i had
caught him off guard when i handed the camera to him and put him on
the spot.....but again, just so I can sleep...lol There were more
than a few people who posted here that saw the same thing....Im the
one though who has been more vocal about it.....
The forum is kind of a snakepit these days with all of the speculation, guessing, and parsing of minimal, partial and anecdotal information. It doesn't make it right that you've been shoved around, but perhaps you can understand why there's a fair amount of skepticism and attempt to take the high road by not responding in-kind to some of the name-calling. I think you'll reinforce your credibility more by not getting into the name-calling (as difficult as that might be!).

--
My photos: http://www.pbase.com/imageiseverything/root
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top