In fact, I spoke to a Pro just today who has extensively used both D3
and D300, a Nikon Rep as well, who very plainly stated quite a
different story, that the D300 is significantly faster than the D200,
faster than the D2, and certainly with AF-S lenses they saw no
noticeable difference to the D3.
What does all that prove? Well, that I can find just as many folks
to refute your "impressions", and that is what they are,
"impressions", just another data point, and most certainly not
definitive.
I am certainly not casting aspersions on you, your veracity or your
motives, simply pointing out that others have been reporting quite a
different story. And when I couple that with the insanity it would
take for Nikon to release the D300 with AF that did not at least
match the current D2 series, well, just doesn't pass the "smell test".
The next few weeks will tell for sure.
Now, if you can show me some verifiably proof of the differences
between the DX and FX versions of the module in the performance area,
you might change my mind. Until then, your speculation and
impression is no better than mine.
I tested both cameras extensively at the photo expo and discussed
this subject in great detail with Nikon personnel. I'm not sure
where the original poster got his information, but both the D3 and
D300 use the SAME EXACT autofocus module. Further, I saw no real
difference in autofocus performance. I'm no noob either- I am a pro
sports photographer that uses a D2xs and D200 with many pro lenses,
so I know what I'm looking at.
Those of you that ordered a D300 and are concerned about autofocus
speed need not worry.
--
http://www.screamandfly.com
My Personal Weblog:
http://weblog.screamandfly.com
--
Bill Dewey
http://www.deweydrive.com