More Lapland pics – and some thoughts

My experience re: shift in thinking depending on the lens you have
matches your thoughts precisely - if I shoot with 105, I look for
portraits, if I shoot with 20 - I look to mix with the crowd, If I
have a superzoom (never owned any, but shot with one for a couple of
days)... well... I get lost - I am not sure what to look for :)
Good to hear, and you're doing well too (your street shots are very nice).
Once again - simply outstanding images... emotional and interesting -
reminds me of our family yearly Siberia mini-expeditions (back, when
I was a teenager)
--
Thanks very much, Alex! Would love to see Siberia.

Regards
Lasse
 
Lasse,

trust me - this little Swede does miss a few things from home.

1, clean air
2, the color green as a dominant color of the environment & nature
3, the lanscape
4, the Stockholm/Swedish archipelago
5, freedom, equality & a few things like that (Pizza - they don't
know how to make pizza here)

But with all the beauty your shot provide - - - -

You can keep the mosquitoes. ;-)
Lil, I'm not a big fan of mosquitoes either (to put it mildly). That's why I tend to go north in September when they are gone. I agree with your other points too, except I rarely eat pizza.

Regards
Lasse
 
Lil, I'm not a big fan of mosquitoes either (to put it mildly).
That's why I tend to go north in September when they are gone. I
agree with your other points too, except I rarely eat pizza.
Didn't think about that Lasse. I've not gone at that time of the year.... I've gone in August to Järpen & I do recall mosquitoes while there at my grandparent's house.

But that makes sense.

Pizza - - they don't know how to make it in Los Angeles. :-( Always have pizza at least once when I go home.

Lil

--

The beginning of a gallery, showing my progression with help from caring friends especially on DPR, can be visited by friends & family at

http://lilknytt.zenfolio.com/
 
I got so many kind responses in the first Lapland thread a week ago
that I just had to post some more images. Knowing that this isn't a
gallery forum. I'll try to justify this post ....
There's no need to justify posting these -- this is, after all, a photography site. These are really good pictures, but I have to ping on one thing that I would correct (because I find I have to correct it in almost every shot of my own!):

Level - level, level, level ... standing water is level, flat, parallel with the top and bottom of the picture frame, unless you're tilting the image for effect. Both of these are landscapes that show a good eye, with a nice tonal range, but they're just not level ... if you're going to go to that much effort to put the frame around them, you should just draw a level horizon first.





It doesn't matter as much with the snapshots of people, but landscapes just need to be level.

--
Roger

http://tinius-photo.com/Roger
 
I think your first example is perfectly level.
Look at the reflections in the wather from threes - level!

What you expect to be level in the second picture I can not see.
I do not expect that the tent is placed perfectly level for one (there are some
sticks behind the tent that are level!)

RogerL
 
Thanks, Roger, for your critique and thanks, Roger, for your support! :)

Honestly, I'm perfectly aware that many (or most?) of my images are not perfectly level. I'm using the grid in the viewfinder but it doesn't help. Personally I don't bother much. Guess I have some kind of automatic level correction in my head. Or am I just level-headed? What do I know?

But I know that some people are very sensitive to this issue and I'll try to think about it in the future. And, Roger, I have to agree with Roger that the second example is slightly tilted to the left (you can see it if you look at the tiny lake behind the tent). The first example is really tricky, you have to carefully examine the horizon in the centre of the image and – damn it – you'll find that it is ever so slightly tilted to the left.

Again, thanks to both of you and I'll try to do better in the future (but I don't promise anything).

Regards
Lasse
 
Yes i really should. Haven't been north of Uppsala even so i guess i will have to grab my gear (Canon) and go up there. I'm missing out of motives....

Tack för de vackra bilderna. (Thanks for the beautiful shots)
--
Rickard
 
Actually, I noticed a slight slant in the T. of Roger T.'s name... ;o)

I remember that you mentioned that there was no tripod (too much weight) in your backpack. So, it would be only natural that finding a way to perfectly level the camera in every picture would be sometimes difficult (nothing that CS3 or NX wouldn't fix, anyways... ).

The second batch is still exceptional! Well done!
Thanks, Roger, for your critique and thanks, Roger, for your support! :)
Honestly, I'm perfectly aware that many (or most?) of my images are
not perfectly level. I'm using the grid in the viewfinder but it
doesn't help. Personally I don't bother much. Guess I have some kind
of automatic level correction in my head. Or am I just level-headed?
What do I know?

But I know that some people are very sensitive to this issue and I'll
try to think about it in the future. And, Roger, I have to agree with
Roger that the second example is slightly tilted to the left (you can
see it if you look at the tiny lake behind the tent). The first
example is really tricky, you have to carefully examine the horizon
in the centre of the image and – damn it – you'll find that it is
ever so slightly tilted to the left.

Again, thanks to both of you and I'll try to do better in the future
(but I don't promise anything).

Regards
Lasse
 
Aah, hyvä! My Finnish is a little rusty, sorry (Swedish and Finnish are two completely different languages, more different than English and Arabian). Hyvä means "good" or "bravo" – thanks again, Dayo!
 
hey beautiful shots indeed... feet looked cold walking through the
stream.
Thanks, Johnny! The water was indeed very cold, only a few degrees above freezing point, but it actually didn't bother me. Crossing streams is a challenge that I enjoy very much and this one was almost too easy. :)

Regards
Lasse
 
Actually, I noticed a slight slant in the T. of Roger T.'s name... ;o)

I remember that you mentioned that there was no tripod (too much
weight) in your backpack. So, it would be only natural that finding a
way to perfectly level the camera in every picture would be sometimes
difficult (nothing that CS3 or NX wouldn't fix, anyways... ).

The second batch is still exceptional! Well done!
Thanks again! I have spirit levels on my tripod heads but I will probably never learn to get my images level when I'm shooting handheld, which I do a lot. Don't know what's wrong with me. And I don't really like the cropping that is inevitable when I need to rotate in PS. So I often prefer to leave my images slightly slanted and hope that noone will notice. :)

Regards
Lasse
 
Level - level, level, level ...
I agree, those pictures are not level. What I find interesting is that they are tilted towards the left, which is also the way those of my pictures that are not level - about 95% ;) - are tilted. I almost never have to correct right tilted level. Do others have the same problem?
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top