SONY dSLR – A100 Quality Issues?

turtle20774

Member
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Location
US
SONY dSLR – A100 Quality Issues?

In January 2007 I purchase a SONY dSLR A100 camera body. I purchased the A100 largely because I had a number of Minolta lenses and a Minolta 3600 HSD flash and wanted to ‘go digital’ at a reasonable cost.

The first thing I noticed is that many of the pictures I shot seemed to be underexposed (noticeable on camera screen, computer screen, and actual prints). So I began shooting exclusively in the P-mode taking multiple pictures ( +1/3, +2/3, and +1 exposure compensations) and then picking the best image as the one to print (but lets face it, commercial photo printers sometimes make the +0 and +1 print images look the same).

Next I noticed that the in-camera flash was producing better pictures that the ‘fully compatible’ Minolta 3600 HSD. In a dark room the in-camera flash produced a ‘good’ picture; the 3600 HSD was very dark. It was like the Minolta flash was firing either too early or too late.

Since I had been asked to take pictures at an indoor retirement party, I purchased the SONY HVL-F56AM Flash. At one point during the 4 hour event, whenever I tried to turn the flash ‘off’ it wouldn’t cooperate – I had to resort to removing the batteries to turn the flash off. I returned the SONY Flash the next day for a replacement one. Whether or not the replacement HVL-F56AM flash will exhibit the same characteristics as the original flash is unknown at this time since I haven’t been in a position where it has been in constant intermittent use.

While on a family vacation in Orlando using the in-camera flash as a ‘fill flash’, the flash refused to fire and the A100 screen displayed a message “Camera Error Code 0x31”. I called SONY and they told me that the camera would have to be repaired – luckily it was still under warranty so I was only on the hook for shipping charges. I’ve just received the repaired camera; haven’t had much of opportunity to use it.

These experiences have led me to believe that SONY released the A100 and some accessories to the public before they were adequately tested (much like a computer BETA software release) or that SONY’s quality control is lax.

All-in-all I like the A100 - especially the convenience of the top left-hand control knob, the ease with which one can adjust exposure compensation and the image stabilization feature (great for low light pictures) , but I am disappointed in the original ‘quality’. Hopefully when the ‘Camera Error Code 0x31’ was addressed, SONY also addressed the Minolta Flash incompatibility and the exposure issues I presented to them in the repair order.
 
Sorry to hear about your luck.

I have had A100 since July 2006, and have 2 flashes Sony 56, and Minolta 5600 HSD and they work like a charm, on camera and wireless. I have never had under exposure issues. Were you shooting too rapidly and the flash did not have enough time to go back to full charge?

Since you are an experience Minolta shooter you are not likely to have this scenarios but i will share my experience.

Once a friend of mine used my camera with flash (He is a Nikon shooter) and he got underexposures, we found that he had mistakenly set the camera to Wireless flash mode. In this mode the on camera flash becomes a remote flash controller and only sends signal to remote device, however camera will expose assuming it is getting more light from remote flash.

Cheers,

N
SONY dSLR – A100 Quality Issues?

In January 2007 I purchase a SONY dSLR A100 camera body. I purchased
the A100 largely because I had a number of Minolta lenses and a
Minolta 3600 HSD flash and wanted to ‘go digital’ at a reasonable
cost.

The first thing I noticed is that many of the pictures I shot seemed
to be underexposed (noticeable on camera screen, computer screen, and
actual prints). So I began shooting exclusively in the P-mode taking
multiple pictures ( +1/3, +2/3, and +1 exposure compensations) and
then picking the best image as the one to print (but lets face it,
commercial photo printers sometimes make the +0 and +1 print images
look the same).

Next I noticed that the in-camera flash was producing better pictures
that the ‘fully compatible’ Minolta 3600 HSD. In a dark room the
in-camera flash produced a ‘good’ picture; the 3600 HSD was very
dark. It was like the Minolta flash was firing either too early or
too late.

Since I had been asked to take pictures at an indoor retirement
party, I purchased the SONY HVL-F56AM Flash. At one point during the
4 hour event, whenever I tried to turn the flash ‘off’ it wouldn’t
cooperate – I had to resort to removing the batteries to turn the
flash off. I returned the SONY Flash the next day for a replacement
one. Whether or not the replacement HVL-F56AM flash will exhibit the
same characteristics as the original flash is unknown at this time
since I haven’t been in a position where it has been in constant
intermittent use.

While on a family vacation in Orlando using the in-camera flash as a
‘fill flash’, the flash refused to fire and the A100 screen displayed
a message “Camera Error Code 0x31”. I called SONY and they told me
that the camera would have to be repaired – luckily it was still
under warranty so I was only on the hook for shipping charges. I’ve
just received the repaired camera; haven’t had much of opportunity to
use it.

These experiences have led me to believe that SONY released the A100
and some accessories to the public before they were adequately tested
(much like a computer BETA software release) or that SONY’s quality
control is lax.

All-in-all I like the A100 - especially the convenience of the top
left-hand control knob, the ease with which one can adjust exposure
compensation and the image stabilization feature (great for low light
pictures) , but I am disappointed in the original ‘quality’.
Hopefully when the ‘Camera Error Code 0x31’ was addressed, SONY also
addressed the Minolta Flash incompatibility and the exposure issues I
presented to them in the repair order.
--
It is funny how, everyone who agrees with you seems so much smarter
 
I also found a general tendency to underexpose when I first had the camera.

Things improved when I stopped using Auto and Program Modes but I have no idea why!

There seems to be an agressive design attitude to avoid burnt out highlights and the influence of the Focus Point can lead to odd results when using Matrix exposure.

Overtime I've adapted to the quirks by constantly checking each shot's histogram and generally adding +1/3 EV. If you shoot in RAW mode exposure isn't an issue.

Flash underexposure remains a different and unanswered riddle for many of us ; despite the length of the threads talking about it.

Let's see how the A700 performs.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top