Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I recently posted in a similar discussion, and i can assure you the
D200 is not soft.
The 18-200, on the other hand, is a different story. I havent tried
it but reportedly it is not the sharpest lens out there. And what can
you expect? I is a 11.1 X zoom after all
I also posted some samples from the D200, but not with the 18-200mm.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1039&message=24750350
If you shoot raw, you must use USM or other form of sharpening to
overcome the gaussian blur incorporated with the built-in AA filter.
If you shoot JPG this is done automatically for you in the camera.
Does this look soft? (pic)
![]()
--
Steve Bingham
http://www.dustylens.com
I always get very good results with the 18-200 if I just pretend it
can't be set below f8. If I need faster I use a different lens.
VR 'off' for flash is another good rule, don't ask me why, but
there's a difference.
--
Z-Man
The 18-200 is a different story - pretty decent in the 18-80 range,
except the corners and the distortion (the latter correctable with
software). Above 100mm it performs less than stellar and while it is
not terrible, it is nothing special and even a lowly and a 55-200 or
70-300 lens would improve on the IQ there.
Tons of discussions on this topic...
--I just ordered the d200 and the 18-200vrII ,it comes Friday .
Just what I needed to hear that the d200 is notoriously soft.
Please anyone post a sharp photographs shot with a D200 18-200 VRII
Regards,
Mihail
http://www.pbase.com/kocho/favorites
Only soft if you shoot JPEG's at default in-camera sharpening (and if
you plan to do that you should have bought a simple point&shoot).
--
Cheers.
...Please don't rub up against my glass...
I can just confirm that the 18-200 is quite soft.
Pictures taken with the 50mm f/1.4 and the 80-200mm f/2.8 are by far
sharper.
Regards,
Nice shot but why has that man got a dead animal on his head?If you shoot raw, you must use USM or other form of sharpening to
overcome the gaussian blur incorporated with the built-in AA filter.
If you shoot JPG this is done automatically for you in the camera.
Does this look soft? (pic)
![]()
--
Steve Bingham
http://www.dustylens.com
I put this chart together awhile ago to help define where the
18-200VR does well and where it is challenged. Basically, as another
poster said, if you can shoot at f/8, you're good to go. The lens
will do great. It is also very good wide open at wide angle (short)
focal lengths.
![]()
On the long end, there seems to be a bit of variation from one lens
to the next. Mine does pretty well on the long end. Here is a shot
taken wide open at f/5.6 and 200mm with VR handheld:
![]()
--
Steve
![]()
The D200 is not soft, but it has a stronger anti-aliasing filter than some cameras, and so if you examine images at 100% (pixel peep) you will see a very slight softness compared to a camera with equivalent pixel count, and no AA filter. Compare the resolution tests on this site, and you will see a very small difference between the D200, the Sony A100 and the Canon 400D.I just ordered the d200 and the 18-200vrII ,it comes Friday .
Just what I needed to hear that the d200 is notoriously soft.
The chances are that your sensor will be outresolving that lens anyway!Please anyone post a sharp photographs shot with a D200 18-200 VRII
Its actually rather hard...
I wouldnt drop it on my bare feet... even with the 18-200mm...
As for the 18-200 i couldnt say as i dont have one.
The D200 though is not soft by any means.
![]()
![]()
--
http://paulgibbs.fotoblog.co.uk/