6 Months and my G2 - long and boring. Read with Caution.

melor

Leading Member
Messages
839
Reaction score
0
Location
US
I have had my G2 for 6 months now. I have taken lots of pictures with it and have some thoughts I would like to share and invite comments on them.

I am coming from a Canon SLR background with my first being a Canon AE-1, and my most recent a EOS Elan IIe. I am an amateur photographer, never displaying publicly or shooting for compensation.

First, I like the small size. I never thought that much about the size of SLRs because that was the size they were. Not much to be thought of, until I started taking pictures with the G2. Small is nice.

The fact that I can shoot and view the pictures on the TFT screen is not as handy as I thought it would be. To check overall picture quality like subject head missing, etc. it is fine, but with the small size of the screen checking focus and fine composition is pointless unless focus is very bad.

Speaking of the TFT screen, this is actually the feature I most love. Given my viewfinder history, it took me a while to start using the screen for shooting. Now I love the fact that I can take candid shots, over the head shots, low shots, etc. without the camera being pressed up to my face. I am anxious to try a monopod over the head shot in a crowd as mentioned on the WWW last week. I wonder if future digital SLR’s will have LCD preview for composition on a swing out panel like the G2.

The pictures are generally quite good. The focus and exposure is not nearly as fast or accurate as my ElanII, but are passable and able to be worked around, though it would be nice if I did not have to work around them.

Like so many other G2 faithful, I have been let down by quality control at Canon and have a case with a hole in it, and a dead pixel group. While these problems are irritating and diminish the satisfaction I have with my camera, I do still love the camera. I having been trying to reach someone at Canon USA who can instill a little confidence in me that the problem will be solved without recurrence, but so far have had no luck.

That being said, I think it is time to frame the 8*10 that is dry out of my printer. Shot yesterday at San Diego Wild Animal Park, on the wall in under 24H. Welcome to the digital age.

Paul
 
I agree wholeheartedly with your opinions on the TFT. You took the words right out of my mouth.

I have, however, gotten better at detecting even slightly out-of-focus, or blurred objects in my photos on the screen, and at deleting bad shots from the camera.

I guess there really isn't a way to tell, for sure, if the shot came out as you intended without lugging around a laptop, printer, or tv...
 
So what are you actually trying to say?
I have had my G2 for 6 months now. I have taken lots of pictures
with it and have some thoughts I would like to share and invite
comments on them.

I am coming from a Canon SLR background with my first being a Canon
AE-1, and my most recent a EOS Elan IIe. I am an amateur
photographer, never displaying publicly or shooting for
compensation.

First, I like the small size. I never thought that much about the
size of SLRs because that was the size they were. Not much to be
thought of, until I started taking pictures with the G2. Small is
nice.

The fact that I can shoot and view the pictures on the TFT screen
is not as handy as I thought it would be. To check overall picture
quality like subject head missing, etc. it is fine, but with the
small size of the screen checking focus and fine composition is
pointless unless focus is very bad.

Speaking of the TFT screen, this is actually the feature I most
love. Given my viewfinder history, it took me a while to start
using the screen for shooting. Now I love the fact that I can take
candid shots, over the head shots, low shots, etc. without the
camera being pressed up to my face. I am anxious to try a monopod
over the head shot in a crowd as mentioned on the WWW last week. I
wonder if future digital SLR’s will have LCD preview for
composition on a swing out panel like the G2.

The pictures are generally quite good. The focus and exposure is
not nearly as fast or accurate as my ElanII, but are passable and
able to be worked around, though it would be nice if I did not have
to work around them.

Like so many other G2 faithful, I have been let down by quality
control at Canon and have a case with a hole in it, and a dead
pixel group. While these problems are irritating and diminish the
satisfaction I have with my camera, I do still love the camera. I
having been trying to reach someone at Canon USA who can instill a
little confidence in me that the problem will be solved without
recurrence, but so far have had no luck.

That being said, I think it is time to frame the 8*10 that is dry
out of my printer. Shot yesterday at San Diego Wild Animal Park, on
the wall in under 24H. Welcome to the digital age.

Paul
 
Try Zooming in on the TFT that is usful for me to check the focus after the shot

Ed.......
I have had my G2 for 6 months now. I have taken lots of pictures
with it and have some thoughts I would like to share and invite
comments on them.

I am coming from a Canon SLR background with my first being a Canon
AE-1, and my most recent a EOS Elan IIe. I am an amateur
photographer, never displaying publicly or shooting for
compensation.

First, I like the small size. I never thought that much about the
size of SLRs because that was the size they were. Not much to be
thought of, until I started taking pictures with the G2. Small is
nice.

The fact that I can shoot and view the pictures on the TFT screen
is not as handy as I thought it would be. To check overall picture
quality like subject head missing, etc. it is fine, but with the
small size of the screen checking focus and fine composition is
pointless unless focus is very bad.

Speaking of the TFT screen, this is actually the feature I most
love. Given my viewfinder history, it took me a while to start
using the screen for shooting. Now I love the fact that I can take
candid shots, over the head shots, low shots, etc. without the
camera being pressed up to my face. I am anxious to try a monopod
over the head shot in a crowd as mentioned on the WWW last week. I
wonder if future digital SLR’s will have LCD preview for
composition on a swing out panel like the G2.

The pictures are generally quite good. The focus and exposure is
not nearly as fast or accurate as my ElanII, but are passable and
able to be worked around, though it would be nice if I did not have
to work around them.

Like so many other G2 faithful, I have been let down by quality
control at Canon and have a case with a hole in it, and a dead
pixel group. While these problems are irritating and diminish the
satisfaction I have with my camera, I do still love the camera. I
having been trying to reach someone at Canon USA who can instill a
little confidence in me that the problem will be solved without
recurrence, but so far have had no luck.

That being said, I think it is time to frame the 8*10 that is dry
out of my printer. Shot yesterday at San Diego Wild Animal Park, on
the wall in under 24H. Welcome to the digital age.

Paul
 
I have had my G2 for 6 months now. I have taken lots of pictures
with it and have some thoughts I would like to share and invite
comments on them.

I am coming from a Canon SLR background with my first being a Canon
AE-1, and my most recent a EOS Elan IIe. I am an amateur
photographer, never displaying publicly or shooting for
compensation.

First, I like the small size. I never thought that much about the
size of SLRs because that was the size they were. Not much to be
thought of, until I started taking pictures with the G2. Small is
nice.

The fact that I can shoot and view the pictures on the TFT screen
is not as handy as I thought it would be. To check overall picture
quality like subject head missing, etc. it is fine, but with the
small size of the screen checking focus and fine composition is
pointless unless focus is very bad.
You do know you can zoom in while reviewing images, right? I have found this to be of immense help in spotting poorly focused images...

MoonDoggie
Speaking of the TFT screen, this is actually the feature I most
love. Given my viewfinder history, it took me a while to start
using the screen for shooting. Now I love the fact that I can take
candid shots, over the head shots, low shots, etc. without the
camera being pressed up to my face. I am anxious to try a monopod
over the head shot in a crowd as mentioned on the WWW last week. I
wonder if future digital SLR’s will have LCD preview for
composition on a swing out panel like the G2.

The pictures are generally quite good. The focus and exposure is
not nearly as fast or accurate as my ElanII, but are passable and
able to be worked around, though it would be nice if I did not have
to work around them.

Like so many other G2 faithful, I have been let down by quality
control at Canon and have a case with a hole in it, and a dead
pixel group. While these problems are irritating and diminish the
satisfaction I have with my camera, I do still love the camera. I
having been trying to reach someone at Canon USA who can instill a
little confidence in me that the problem will be solved without
recurrence, but so far have had no luck.

That being said, I think it is time to frame the 8*10 that is dry
out of my printer. Shot yesterday at San Diego Wild Animal Park, on
the wall in under 24H. Welcome to the digital age.

Paul
 
NNS, is it any particular word, or the way I have them strung together? You may enjoy the Haiku version that I am working on. It should be posted here in 72 hours... haha

Seriously, I am saying realy nothing. Didn't you watch Seinfeld on TV? That series ran for years on the same concept.

PJ
I have had my G2 for 6 months now. I have taken lots of pictures
with it and have some thoughts I would like to share and invite
comments on them.

I am coming from a Canon SLR background with my first being a Canon
AE-1, and my most recent a EOS Elan IIe. I am an amateur
photographer, never displaying publicly or shooting for
compensation.

First, I like the small size. I never thought that much about the
size of SLRs because that was the size they were. Not much to be
thought of, until I started taking pictures with the G2. Small is
nice.

The fact that I can shoot and view the pictures on the TFT screen
is not as handy as I thought it would be. To check overall picture
quality like subject head missing, etc. it is fine, but with the
small size of the screen checking focus and fine composition is
pointless unless focus is very bad.

Speaking of the TFT screen, this is actually the feature I most
love. Given my viewfinder history, it took me a while to start
using the screen for shooting. Now I love the fact that I can take
candid shots, over the head shots, low shots, etc. without the
camera being pressed up to my face. I am anxious to try a monopod
over the head shot in a crowd as mentioned on the WWW last week. I
wonder if future digital SLR’s will have LCD preview for
composition on a swing out panel like the G2.

The pictures are generally quite good. The focus and exposure is
not nearly as fast or accurate as my ElanII, but are passable and
able to be worked around, though it would be nice if I did not have
to work around them.

Like so many other G2 faithful, I have been let down by quality
control at Canon and have a case with a hole in it, and a dead
pixel group. While these problems are irritating and diminish the
satisfaction I have with my camera, I do still love the camera. I
having been trying to reach someone at Canon USA who can instill a
little confidence in me that the problem will be solved without
recurrence, but so far have had no luck.

That being said, I think it is time to frame the 8*10 that is dry
out of my printer. Shot yesterday at San Diego Wild Animal Park, on
the wall in under 24H. Welcome to the digital age.

Paul
 
Moondoggie and ER wrote to tell me about the Zoom feature.

Yes, I do use the feature, but I don't trust it. I shoot in RAW mode exclusively, and I believe that you are just zooming on the thumbnail of the RAW image. If I shot in JPG, it may help, but I haven't tried that since I don't.

Another rambling G2 comment: Large thumbs and my holding style ( the camera that is ) cause me to hit it into macro mode every once in a while. Lost about 10 pics of a party that way about 5 months ago. Since then, I check for the little flower of focus death before I shoot.

PJ
 
You are right, zooming the screen for a RAW image actually zooms a poor quality JPEG of the actual file. On camera it makes RAW results look a whole lot worse than superfine JPEGs.

On the rambling theme - I want a left handed camera, or at least one that is 'neutral'. Us sinstral people are always discriminated against.

Gordon
Moondoggie and ER wrote to tell me about the Zoom feature.

Yes, I do use the feature, but I don't trust it. I shoot in RAW
mode exclusively, and I believe that you are just zooming on the
thumbnail of the RAW image. If I shot in JPG, it may help, but I
haven't tried that since I don't.

Another rambling G2 comment: Large thumbs and my holding style (
the camera that is ) cause me to hit it into macro mode every once
in a while. Lost about 10 pics of a party that way about 5 months
ago. Since then, I check for the little flower of focus death
before I shoot.

PJ
 
On the rambling theme - I want a left handed camera, or at least
one that is 'neutral'. Us sinstral people are always discriminated
against.

Gordon
Moondoggie and ER wrote to tell me about the Zoom feature.

Yes, I do use the feature, but I don't trust it. I shoot in RAW
mode exclusively, and I believe that you are just zooming on the
thumbnail of the RAW image. If I shot in JPG, it may help, but I
haven't tried that since I don't.

Another rambling G2 comment: Large thumbs and my holding style (
the camera that is ) cause me to hit it into macro mode every once
in a while. Lost about 10 pics of a party that way about 5 months
ago. Since then, I check for the little flower of focus death
before I shoot.

PJ
Sill, the zoom feature does allow you to easily eliminate those shots with unsatisfactory elements (slight fuzziness, some red-eye, artifacts, etc) which may not always appear on the full thumbnail. Certainly nothing replaces openign that puppy up on a nice 21" Trini, but for quick & dirty field work, it has proven very useful to me.

MoonDoggie
 
Another 6 month observation related to LCD monitor for framing.

With my SLR photos, I almost never had a horizon problem. Seems that because I often fold out my screen on my G2, I lose perspective on the tilt of the camera and many of my pictures are atilt.

Do you have this problem?? Do you fold out the LCD, or do you keep it flush with the back?

Paul
 
Yes, Gordon. And left-handed serrated knives and a thousand other southpaw-friendly inventions! No wonder we're more creative than our rightie counter-parts! We have to be.
On the rambling theme - I want a left handed camera, or at least
one that is 'neutral'. Us sinstral people are always discriminated
against.
Gordon-- Happy with G2 since Dec., 2001*LizL
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top