BrianHuffman
Forum Enthusiast
Okay, I set my 17-40 on 24 and shot different subjects.
For landscapes and getting the whole room, slightly tight for room, couldn't get all the landscape in. But 17 is tight sometimes too. For people, my main subject, worked fine.
Then took my 50 1.4 and set it to 2.8 and shot around indoors. Better, but not 1.4.
The 17-55 2.8 IS would fit the bill, but it doesn't fit my upgrade path to FF. I have alot more shooting and expiermenting to do before I drop a grand on a lens.
--
BrianH
For landscapes and getting the whole room, slightly tight for room, couldn't get all the landscape in. But 17 is tight sometimes too. For people, my main subject, worked fine.
Then took my 50 1.4 and set it to 2.8 and shot around indoors. Better, but not 1.4.
The 17-55 2.8 IS would fit the bill, but it doesn't fit my upgrade path to FF. I have alot more shooting and expiermenting to do before I drop a grand on a lens.
--
BrianH