Lenses, Adapters, Filters OH MY! (sorry for the length = )

Kelvin Li

Member
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Location
Seattle, US
Well,

after reading and reading and reading various posts about different lenses, adapters etc, I've come to one conclusion - I still don't have a clear answer on what to get.

Everyone has their own opinions on how lenses perform, or how good one brand is over another, or how much you should be willing to spend. But there doesn't seem to be any one consensus by everyone. What I do know is that in the end, it all comes down to personal preference. If you are happy with what you have, none of the above mentioned criteria really matter. However, since I don't HAVE anything yet (besides of course my G2 which I love - and more so since I have no crack yet), I am still at a bit of a loss as to what will make me happy. But of course, until I try, I can't know for sure.

At this point it seems that I'm leaning towards getting the Hakuba 43mm Lens adapter and the Tiffen 2x Megaplus Telephoto Converter.

1) because the Tiffen fits directly onton the Hakuba without any stepup/down rings

2) because the Hakuba, from what I have read, seems to be the least obtrusive of the bunch (Tiffen, Lensmate, Canon - Plus it just looks nice)

3) the Tiffen from what I have read seems to do a decent job at a much lower cost with minor vignetting (albeit it doesn't allow you to zoom in/out much)

Now as far as any UV filters or Polarizers go, I still have no idea, though from what I have read, Hoya Multi-coated HMC filters are good, and so are B+W (though I still need to do more research on this). The same seems to go for Macro lenses/filters.

I typically photography anything and everything that might catch my attention, but the main purpose for the Telephoto lens is some at least avg zoom for taking pictures at sporting events, mainly baseball. I don't need to be able to see the whiskers on Ichiro's face (Go Mariners!), but I don't want him to look like an ant either.

I'd appreciate any serious pros or cons to getting these 2 together (Hakuba + Tiffen) directly (as another user put it - straight from the horses mouth), as searching through the forums can be frustrating.

If you would like to throw in a suggestion or two about macro lenses/filter and UV filters and polarizers, all the more appreciated.

Thanks!
kli
 
I too had the same problem before but I ended up returning the lensmate for the Hakuba adpter ring and the MC lens guard, I know you I can just zoom in 3 times to avoid the shadow when using the internal flash or I can eliminate it by using an external flash, But still I find myself fogetting to do this when I shoot indoors most of the time thus making a decision to get the Hakuba and I don't see myself buying the external flash soon.

Also I'm going with the Hakuba 1.8X teleconverter lens and maybe its .7x wide adapter later. They even have there own uv and polarizer filter if you prefer that.

Just go ahead get what you want as there is no specific "perfect" accessories for the G2, Like what you said in the end, it all comes down to personal preference.

Derick
Well,
after reading and reading and reading various posts about different
lenses, adapters etc, I've come to one conclusion - I still don't
have a clear answer on what to get.
Everyone has their own opinions on how lenses perform, or how good
one brand is over another, or how much you should be willing to
spend. But there doesn't seem to be any one consensus by everyone.
What I do know is that in the end, it all comes down to personal
preference. If you are happy with what you have, none of the above
mentioned criteria really matter. However, since I don't HAVE
anything yet (besides of course my G2 which I love - and more so
since I have no crack yet), I am still at a bit of a loss as to
what will make me happy. But of course, until I try, I can't know
for sure.

At this point it seems that I'm leaning towards getting the Hakuba
43mm Lens adapter and the Tiffen 2x Megaplus Telephoto Converter.
1) because the Tiffen fits directly onton the Hakuba without any
stepup/down rings

2) because the Hakuba, from what I have read, seems to be the least
obtrusive of the bunch (Tiffen, Lensmate, Canon - Plus it just
looks nice)

3) the Tiffen from what I have read seems to do a decent job at a
much lower cost with minor vignetting (albeit it doesn't allow you
to zoom in/out much)

Now as far as any UV filters or Polarizers go, I still have no
idea, though from what I have read, Hoya Multi-coated HMC filters
are good, and so are B+W (though I still need to do more research
on this). The same seems to go for Macro lenses/filters.

I typically photography anything and everything that might catch my
attention, but the main purpose for the Telephoto lens is some at
least avg zoom for taking pictures at sporting events, mainly
baseball. I don't need to be able to see the whiskers on Ichiro's
face (Go Mariners!), but I don't want him to look like an ant
either.

I'd appreciate any serious pros or cons to getting these 2 together
(Hakuba + Tiffen) directly (as another user put it - straight from
the horses mouth), as searching through the forums can be
frustrating.
If you would like to throw in a suggestion or two about macro
lenses/filter and UV filters and polarizers, all the more
appreciated.

Thanks!
kli
 
Hi

I went for the Lensmate, and then the B+W UV 10 ES filter. (B+W is cheaper than the equivalent Hoya in Europe).

Get good stuff as UV filter, you dont want to degrade the lens.

JJ
 
Also I'm going with the Hakuba 1.8X teleconverter lens and maybe
its .7x wide adapter later. They even have there own uv and
polarizer filter if you prefer that.
Correction (again), apparently the 43mm wide angle is 0.6X, it's the 52mm that is 0.7X. Where's a Hakuba UV at, please? I hadn't seen one.--Farewell, Bob H.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top