Sigma 70 - 300 APO DG

  • Thread starter Thread starter Negative287
  • Start date Start date
N

Negative287

Guest
If anybody has this lens can you tell me do the earlier versions clearly show APO on the lens itself?

I'm just curious as My lens says Sigma DG in Gold but it doesn't say APO or DG near the white print which is very different from the pictures Sigma has. Of course KEH sold me the lens as an APO DG so I would like to verify that it is in fact an APO DG before I return the lens.

--



'The probability that we may fall in the struggle ought not to deter us from the support of a cause we believe to be just; it shall not deter me.' -- Abraham Lincoln
 
But both of those lenses look completely different from the lens I have.
Just went to the sigma site there is an APO and a non-APO version see
links below. Sound like you have the non APO version.

http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses_all_details.asp?id=3304&navigator=3
http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses_all_details.asp?id=3303&navigator=3

For what it's worth my 70-200 eg dg definitely has APO printed on it,
I do not think that sigma would leave it off.

Cheers
--



'The probability that we may fall in the struggle ought not to deter us from the support of a cause we believe to be just; it shall not deter me.' -- Abraham Lincoln
 
Pete

You might want to try e-mailing Dragon (alephone) you know the guy that had pics of people water-skiing on the St.Lawrence River in yesterday's posts..he has the older APO f2.8 non-Macro...you could check with him to see what it says on his lens. Maybe they didn't write APO on it. Worth a try!
Anyway Dragon can be reached by e-mail if you check his profile. Good luck Pete!

All the best

Mitch
--
Pentax K10D and Canon G7...simply the very best!
mitch
 
Hi Pete

I do have Sigma 70-200 EX version and it's a bit deferent from what you got.EX is the end line of Sigma lenses but I do know that Sigma has few version(2-4)of the lens you bought and not to long a go there was a post about it.If I run into I'll leave you the link:)

Good luck

Dragon
--



http://www.pbase.com/alefone/root
 
old careless brained Leo can't read!!!! Dragon has a 70-200 APO lens not a 70-300 APO...sorry for a second time! LOL! And I taught reading and English for more years than I care to remember! Laugh even louder!!!!!!!!!
Best regards

Leo
--
Pentax K10D and Canon G7...simply the very best!
mitch
 
Thanks anyway, I'm just looking for a Sigma 70 - 300 APO to tide me over until the 70 - 200's get more reasonably priced.
old careless brained Leo can't read!!!! Dragon has a 70-200 APO lens
not a 70-300 APO...sorry for a second time! LOL! And I taught reading
and English for more years than I care to remember! Laugh even
louder!!!!!!!!!
Best regards

Leo
--
Pentax K10D and Canon G7...simply the very best!
mitch
--



'The probability that we may fall in the struggle ought not to deter us from the support of a cause we believe to be just; it shall not deter me.' -- Abraham Lincoln
 
Yes, all generations of this lens have APO and non-APO versions, and they are clearly labeled as APO if and only if low dispersion glass is used.

If your lens does not have the APO label, it isn't the APO version.
If anybody has this lens can you tell me do the earlier versions
clearly show APO on the lens itself?

I'm just curious as My lens says Sigma DG in Gold but it doesn't say
APO or DG near the white print which is very different from the
pictures Sigma has. Of course KEH sold me the lens as an APO DG so I
would like to verify that it is in fact an APO DG before I return the
lens.

--



'The probability that we may fall in the struggle ought not to deter
us from the support of a cause we believe to be just; it shall not
deter me.' -- Abraham Lincoln
 
Are you positive of this? I just want to make sure before I raise sh*t storm on the KEH phone lines!
If your lens does not have the APO label, it isn't the APO version.
If anybody has this lens can you tell me do the earlier versions
clearly show APO on the lens itself?

I'm just curious as My lens says Sigma DG in Gold but it doesn't say
APO or DG near the white print which is very different from the
pictures Sigma has. Of course KEH sold me the lens as an APO DG so I
would like to verify that it is in fact an APO DG before I return the
lens.

--



'The probability that we may fall in the struggle ought not to deter
us from the support of a cause we believe to be just; it shall not
deter me.' -- Abraham Lincoln
--



'The probability that we may fall in the struggle ought not to deter us from the support of a cause we believe to be just; it shall not deter me.' -- Abraham Lincoln
 
I bought a used 70-300 from Henry's here in Canada which was labelled as the APO version, after looking it up on the net I realized that it was not the APO version(they are clearly labelled as such according to another photo. store as well) I returned it to another Henry's and they also confirmed it had been mislabelled and gave me my money back.
--
Trina
Ontario, Canada

 
Better built, 6 year warranty, sharper, etc...
Sigma 70-300 APO DG macro is nice lens also, and good value for money (like Tamron 70-300). I'm not so sure about Tamron's better quality & sharpness ;-) Both lenses needs to be stopped down to f/8-f/11 to get better sharpness (at 300mm).

--


  • Ari Aikomus -
'Why should I feel lonely ? is not our planet in the Milky way?'
 
I just got this lens and it definitely says APO DG on it and has a red ring. From my test shots so far, it seems just as sharp as the Tamron and does not suffer from the horrible purple fringing I've seen in pictures taken with the Tamron. The build quality also seems good, so I can't see why anyone would complain about that. If you don't want to have to do a lot of post processing I would definitely recommend spending the extra $50 on the Sigma.
 
Hi,

I know four different version of that Sigma 70-300 lens:
  • APO ver.
Sigma 70-300 F4-5.6 APO Macro Super II (Discontinued)





Sigma 70-300 F4-5.6 DG APO Macro


  • non APO ver.
Sigma 70-300 F4-5.6 Macro Super II (Discontinued)



Sigma 70-300 F4-5.6 DG Macro



Happy Shootings!

Ari

--


  • Ari Aikomus -
'Why should I feel lonely ? is not our planet in the Milky way?'
 
...It seem that brand new Sigma 70-300 lenses has different prints (in gold) also:
  • APO ver.
Sigma 70-300 F4-5.6 DG APO Macro


  • non APO ver.
Sigma 70-300 F4-5.6 DG Macro


Hi,

I know four different version of that Sigma 70-300 lens:
  • APO ver.
Sigma 70-300 F4-5.6 APO Macro Super II (Discontinued)





Sigma 70-300 F4-5.6 DG APO Macro


  • non APO ver.
Sigma 70-300 F4-5.6 Macro Super II (Discontinued)



Sigma 70-300 F4-5.6 DG Macro



Happy Shootings!

Ari

--


  • Ari Aikomus -
'Why should I feel lonely ? is not our planet in the Milky way?'
--


  • Ari Aikomus -
'Why should I feel lonely ? is not our planet in the Milky way?'
 
From my test shots so far, it seems just as sharp as the
Tamron and does not suffer from the horrible purple fringing I've
seen in pictures taken with the Tamron. The build quality also seems
good, so I can't see why anyone would complain about that.
From direct test lab comparisons, the Tamron is easily sharper especially at 300mm. There seems to have been a few examples of the lens that had more purple fringing than most - and those people post a lot. Mine, and many others have no problem with this. When I had the Sigma, there was dark green fringing that I don't have on my Tamron. If someone has a Tamron with bad purple fringing, return it. Get a better copy - its guaranteed.

Optically, there are more lines/LPH resolution for the Tamron at all focal lengths in all tests. The lightness, and build quality backed by 6 year warranty are worthwhile as well.
 
I have seen non-APOs with the red ring, friend has a DL Macro Super and her's has the red ring...

My 2 pence worth is if it doesn't say APO then it probably isn't....

--
130 years of International Football at the Cae Ras, Wrecsam
Cymru vs Yr Alban May 1877
Cymru vs Seland Newydd May 2007. SAVE THE TURF
 
From my test shots so far, it seems just as sharp as the
Tamron and does not suffer from the horrible purple fringing I've
seen in pictures taken with the Tamron. The build quality also seems
good, so I can't see why anyone would complain about that.
From direct test lab comparisons, the Tamron is easily sharper
especially at 300mm. There seems to have been a few examples of the
lens that had more purple fringing than most - and those people post
a lot. Mine, and many others have no problem with this. When I had
the Sigma, there was dark green fringing that I don't have on my
Tamron. If someone has a Tamron with bad purple fringing, return it.
Get a better copy - its guaranteed.

Optically, there are more lines/LPH resolution for the Tamron at all
focal lengths in all tests. The lightness, and build quality backed
by 6 year warranty are worthwhile as well.
Do you have a link to these "direct lab test comparisons"? I did a lot of research on both lenses before deciding on the Sigma and came across no such thing. The closest I found to that was a comparison of the lenses on two different mounts and I've read that tht cannot be taken as a fair comparison due to different rating systems for Canon and Pentax. Do you have any direct proof that the Tamron has more resolution?

Also, I've noticed no green fringing on my APO DG model, but I have heard of non-APO models suffering from it, perhaps you were unlucky like the many people who ended up with the extreme purple fringing on their Tamrons.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top