I was just going to post that link.
Yes, it's true, the grass isn't any greener elsewhere. All bodies
have a learning curve, and many have problems with the new release.
As I've said before, I saw some pretty poor, and noisy shots coming
from the MK III at the Sports Shooter Academy IV in April. This
proved to me: It's the photographer dummy!
Actually, I am encouraged by all of this. I think the new Nikon
offering will be fantastic, and I am happy to keep shooting with my
dialed in D2X until then.
Plus, in the back of my mind, I hope some of the nimrods that
jumped ship, and just HAD to tell everyone on this forum they were
doing so, are taking a LONG HARD look in the mirror of shame.
Slightly better hi iso performance and worse AF performance? Super!
Also, I don’t think that article mentioned this, but many are
complaining about a severe softness problem in the 3 inch monitor
on the MK III. It makes it very hard to judge sharpness in the
field with the monitor. This is a major problem if true, and
somewhat defeats the purpose of having the quick feedback of the
monitor.