I just got the SD800 and here's what I think

Danel

Senior Member
Messages
2,905
Reaction score
48
Location
Lincoln, USA, US
I was looking for a camera with great image quality that was small, stylish, and had image stabalization. I realize that this site was less than totally enthusiastic about this camera when it was reviewed, giving the camera a 7 for image quality and only a "recommended". However, other sites reviewing the camera seemed to like it alot so I thought I would give it a try.

Overall, I have been very pleased with the camera. True, there is occasionally some softness in a small part of the upper corners at 28mm in certain situations, but so what? Few subcompacts even offer 28mm, and most of the time the softness isn't even noticeable. I rarely focus on the upper corners of a picture unless I'm just looking for problems. Another issue is that there is a tendency to blow some highlights when shooting in bright conditions, but most if not all compact digicams have this problem. I have used the camera enough to know when it is likely to happen so I just set exposure to -1/3 or -2/3 in those situations and the problem is mostly solved. Lastly, like almost every other camera in this segment (except a couple of fujis) the high ISO noise starts kicking in at ISO 400, but the result is actually better than what you see on many compact cameras. With a little noise reduction in PP ISO 400 is generally very usable. Let's face it, ISO 800, 1600, and 3200 (some cams) on most of these little digicams are really there just for marketing purposes. ISO 1600 and 3200 on a 1/2.5 sensor? Puhleease!

What I like is that 90 to 100% of the photo (depending on conditions) is nice and sharp even at 28mm. Once you zoom in a bit corner softness quickly disappears and the whole photo is sharp. The colors this camera produces are very nice indeed, and the optional settings give you some control over what you get. In short, the image quality is super almost all of the time. To me, that is the most important consideration. The image stabalization works great and is, IMO, almost a necessity on a little camera like this. I have shot a few hundred pictures thus far, and I can count on the fingers of one hand (without the thumb) the number of pictures that have been blurred. The performance of the camera is pretty snappy, quick to start up, fast focusing, fast flash recovery (I was surprised you could leave the flash on in continuous mode and still get almost a shot a second if the subject isn't too far away). Pretty impressive for a sub-compact.

So in my opinion, if you want a very nice little compact point and shoot that takes great pictures, has speedy performance, and does it all with style, this camera fits the bill. I'm not saying its perfect...no camera really is. When you go for a little sub-compact there are always going to be some compromises. Still, overall, this is a great camera. "Highly Recommended" IMHO ;-)
 
I have to agree. The 800IS is one of the most under rated cameras at dp review.
 
Great post and pics from the 800IS.

I have been going back and forth between the 700 and 800. Bottom line is that the 700 takes slightly better, corner to corner shots...BUT the corners for the 700 aren't as far apart as the 800 ;)

In a ultra compact, which is more important? Tele or WA? For me it's WA all the way. The SD800IS is an amazing little thing and I'll be picking one up ASAP to go along with my S3 & A95.

Thanks for the post.
--
James

 
I have both the SD700 and the SD800. The SD700 is slightly sharper at the edges as has already been noted but the SD800 with its wider field is a joy to use and takes shots I can't possibly get with the SD700. One other thing that has not been mentioned is that the LCD screen on the SD800 is light years better than the one on the SD700. I am hoping the new SD850IS uses a screen that is at least as good as the one on the SD800.
 
I have the SD800IS too, having upgraded from my previous SD700IS and I can tell you I'm quite pleased with the quality of the pics.

But I still have to say that the IQ is not better than that of the SD700IS.

But with the better LCD and wide angle, who can resist?

My next camera will be the S5IS (hopefully it doesn't perform as bad as the H9) and as good as the S3IS....I just want more tele now!!

--
Yus.

'Photography is the Art or Process of Producing Images,
The Art of Photography is Another Story.'
 
Great post and pics from the 800IS.

I have been going back and forth between the 700 and 800. Bottom
line is that the 700 takes slightly better, corner to corner
shots...BUT the corners for the 700 aren't as far apart as the 800
;)

In a ultra compact, which is more important? Tele or WA? For me
it's WA all the way. The SD800IS is an amazing little thing and
I'll be picking one up ASAP to go along with my S3 & A95.

Thanks for the post.
I agree with your point about WA being more important in a P&S. Often times this camera will be used in close quarters and having the extra width is a big plus. Thanks for your compliments.
 
great pics. really been debating between the pros of the 800 WA compared to the IQ of the 700, and i'm leaning towards WA. still waiting on the 850 to come out so i can compare it, but already ordered some generic NB5L batteries for when I bite the bullet and get the right powershot for me.
 
great pics. really been debating between the pros of the 800 WA
compared to the IQ of the 700, and i'm leaning towards WA. still
waiting on the 850 to come out so i can compare it, but already
ordered some generic NB5L batteries for when I bite the bullet and
get the right powershot for me.
Yeah, but the 850 still only starts at 35mm. I mean how much better could the 850's pics be than the 800? The 700 while a bit better than the 800 IQ wise is certainly not enough to give up the 28mm of the 800? I would think the 850 is in the same boat as the 700.

Meaning, if you really want the WA in an ultra compact and you are satisfied with the 800's IQ...why the delay in buying the 800? Just curious about your thought process...not trying to be argumentative.

--
James

 
hi Danel.

Beauty shots, I really like the #3. Now I am trying to upload some of my photos. rich66 had told me to open account at photobucket.com Is that where you uploaded you picture? Can you help? Thanks a million. What about the image size? Do you have to down size the image?
 
I got them both as a gift for Xmas. I found the IQ better on the 700. I also do not tend to shoot all the way wide, I tend to be zoomed in a little, (probably about 50mm average equivalent) I find at 35 you are to “in your face”, and it does not have a pleasing perspective.

So from my testing, both cameras a little zoomed in, the 700 was much sharper.

With that said, if you need the wide end, the 800 was ok. I would give up a little IQ for the wide end if you need it.
 
While I very much appreciate Phil's work over the years, his rating has never been 100% in my purchase decision. One more important thing: most of us don't make as good images as he. Phil can shoot really good images even from a low grade camera. Majority of his shots were also outdoor where there was plenty of light. So you can't make decision based on the samples either.

The only way is, check it out yourself.
 
hi Danel.
Beauty shots, I really like the #3. Now I am trying to upload some
of my photos. rich66 had told me to open account at photobucket.com
Is that where you uploaded you picture? Can you help? Thanks a
million. What about the image size? Do you have to down size the
image?
Thank you. Just go to http://www.photobucket.com and follow the steps that are on the web-site. I just went with a free membership so I can post pictures in forums. You are limited to size of photo as well as amount of over all volume of photos. If I was to pay for a membership and put tons of pictures online I would probably use Smugmug. For $39 per year you can put as many photos as you want online without limitations. You could actually use them to back-up all your photos.
 
I have both the SD700 and the SD800. The SD700 is slightly sharper at the edges...
Is it only the edges that are slightly sharper?

If the edges weren't counted, is the SD700 still sharper? or not?
The SD700 images are sharp from edge-to-edge.

Here's my take on the situation in general:

If you buy a digital camera with a wide angle lens, and the images are soft at the edges so you may have to crop them away when editing, what's the benefit of the wide angle?

Many people are happy with the SD800 and others are not. So, what else is new?! ;-)

--
gail ~ http://www.pbase.com/gailb
My digital camera BLOGs: Panasonic TZ3, Canon SD700 & S2
http://www.digicamhelp.com/camera-logs/index.php
 
I have both the SD700 and the SD800. The SD700 is slightly sharper at the edges...
Is it only the edges that are slightly sharper?

If the edges weren't counted, is the SD700 still sharper? or not?
To answer your question, other than the edges and mainly the corners the SD800 is at least as sharp as the SD700 (maybe even sharper in the meat of the frame ) And no matter what others say the SD700 is not perfectly sharp in the corners at widest angle either. The SD700 has a better built battery compartment and the SD800 has a much better LCD and smoother zoom mechanism. Colors are recorded slightly different in the 2 cameras with identical settings, I especially notice it in the green grass and trees. I think the SD800 may be the more accurate here but it is a not a big deal either way. I have both cameras and like them both.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top