Fast primes for me. As you already know (we've been on other IR
threads before), I find that it takes over 12 stops DOWN for IR
shooting on my D80.
So, I'd take an f/1.8 over anything f/2.8 if I could. Otherwise, I
can't tell you, since I have only my 58mm R-72. I've used it only
my 24 f/2.8, 35 f/2, 50 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8, and Vivitar (Tokina-made)
90mm f/2.5 Macro. All the 52mm threads, I've got a step-up ring
which works fine.
The IQ of my 35 f/2 is not as sharp, since it is my only non-Nikorr
lens from the above list (and Macro also, as mentioned).
Otherwise, results were similar from each.
Haven't shot IR on anything else, would love to use my Sigma 24-70
f/2.8 but can't justify an expensive 82mm IR filter! Also, would
LOVE to use on my Tokina 12-24, but a 77mm is pricey, and f/4 is a
touch slow pushing ISO up and shutter down to tripod shooting ONLY.
If I sell some more sports photos, I'm getting the Sigma 30 f/1.4
and would be EXCITED to shoot on that for IR?! That might be worth
getting the 62mm filter, but would prolly just opt for a step down
ring to 58mm. But for landscape, the Sigma 20 f/1.8 prolly can't
be beat for IR (HUGE 82mm filter threads again).
Cheers.
David