It looks as if you can get really good images if you don't just point and shoot.
Extra care must also be taken in manual.
This may be THE camera for AAK, Olga, and the like.
If I get one, I will certainly also keep either my H1 or F707.
Those cameras I can P&S in auto and get good results (with perhaps a bit of Photoshop).
When I have time, I do go off auto, but I am almost the photographic equivalent of tone deaf (image blind??). I also don't practice enough.
I was a physicist and then an engineer, so I understand all of the factors at play. (I also did image processing using the first digital algorithms - it took many hours to process an image circa 1968). My problem is that before I can set up manual to get a bird shot, the critter has died of old age.
Unfortunately for SONY, I think they may have (unintentionally) targeted too small a customer base with the H9. The sensitivity to conditions sounds fixable either with new firmware or the H11.
Extra care must also be taken in manual.
This may be THE camera for AAK, Olga, and the like.
If I get one, I will certainly also keep either my H1 or F707.
Those cameras I can P&S in auto and get good results (with perhaps a bit of Photoshop).
When I have time, I do go off auto, but I am almost the photographic equivalent of tone deaf (image blind??). I also don't practice enough.
I was a physicist and then an engineer, so I understand all of the factors at play. (I also did image processing using the first digital algorithms - it took many hours to process an image circa 1968). My problem is that before I can set up manual to get a bird shot, the critter has died of old age.
Unfortunately for SONY, I think they may have (unintentionally) targeted too small a customer base with the H9. The sensitivity to conditions sounds fixable either with new firmware or the H11.