of a CMOS). Any later than this and the man would look foolish
saying it was 'soon',
Well, I think you might want to re-read the article. I don't
believe the Canon spokesman used the word "soon." The idea that it
will be 'soon' is implied by the writer of the article...
Eamon,
Re. "re-read"-ing the article(carefully): perhaps we read the same
"English" differently ;-)
If the quoted SPEAKER (not the writer)
"Lou Desiderio, a spokesman for Canon,
actually
said he doubted that the
pixel gap between Canon's new camera and its most expensive model
would last long. "It's pretty safe to say that a six- or
eight-megapixel replacement for the 1D will be coming,"
then...the "idea" was "implied" by the speaker. NOT the writer.
I think a fair inference is that if "the gap" won't "last
long",...then it will be-filled BEFORE LONG, i.e. "sooner" rather
than "later".
The first portion of the "Lou said",...while admittedly NOT in
quotes, WAS reported as fact ("Lou ,,,SAID"...)!
If he did not-in-fact "SAY" the first portion, then the writer has
flatly misrepresented the facts of the conversation ITSELF,
never-mind the "background context".
I agree with you that defining "soon" is a separate matter .
Larry "just to be an irritating noodge about accuracy"
and may or may not represent an accurate representation of the background
context in which the conversation took place. The Times is good
about that sort of thing, but not perfect. Also, what's 'soon'? 3
months, 9 months, 12 months? In product development circles, "soon"
might well mean a year.
... and the
new 1d and D1x to battle out the 8mp professional market later in
the year.
Again, just to be an irritating noodge about accuracy, the Canon
spokesperson said "6 or 8" megapixels, not just 8.
I'm not trying to rain on anybody's parade. But this looks to me
like one of those things that could very quickly become a 'Canon
said they'd have an 8-megapixel EOS-1D out within 3 months. So
where is it?'