Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
--No one is going to pay $4000-$6000 for an Olympus, Pentax or Sony.Some Pentax folk are waiting for a K1D, Sony plans to bring a pro
DSLR in 2008 (maybe 2007?), Nikon shooters are waiting for a Nikon
D3H/x and so on...
Even Canon people are waiting for successors to the 30D and 5D and
they are waiting for a "3D" since 2000....
DSLR market is said to be further growing in 2007, 2008,..., so why
do you think an E-1 successor in 2007 must be to late for Olympus?
It could be to late for you, but that's a different story...
Are you saying that the 'next generation E-1' will not arrive in 2007? If so, I do not see why: Olympus has said that it is coming this year,and I have seen nothing to contradict that.I hoped I would have the new Olympus in the spring of 2005. Did not happen. Then I hoped again in the spring of 2006. Did not happen. I was sure that I would have it this year. But no.
So you completely abandon your original scare story about the 1DMkIII, and replace it by a new scare story about a camera that is so far totally imaginary, with no statements at all from Canon about it yet, let alone the detailed specs that you demand from Olympus.Oly users may not want a $4000 camera but right after the Mark III we will be seeing the canon 40D at a good price.
Strange, given that in 2006, Canon's market share shrunk and Nikon closed the gap in market share. In part because the D200 has sold far better than the 5D, not only in unit sales but probably in gross revenues too.As for the ? to me of ware do i see everyone jumping to canon and moving away from Nikon.
And every week people are selling off the Nikon equipment and buying into canon.
Do you really think that a new camera from any manufacturer is
going take you to your photographic promised land?
If people would spend more time practicing their use of their
current imaging tools, invest time in their technical practice of
the craft and be more creative in thinking through their
compositions, they just might find the satisfaction they think some
new widget camera is going to bring them.
Try and excercise some patience. Forget that Olympus is even
preparing a new high end camera for market. When it is announced,
do a prudent assessment of how it may be an added resource for your
photographic needs and act accordingly.
Maybe instead of using so much emotional energy yearning for that
new widget, you could go out on a creative and inspiring photo trek
and post some truly wonderful images here in the forum?
Life is good...it tends to give back what we invest in it...
Dan
--
The 'Camera'...but a tool of the 'Artist'...the creator needs but a
chalk and a slate to render immortality...
So you completely abandon your original scare story about theOly users may not want a $4000 camera but right after the Mark III we will be seeing the canon 40D at a good price.
1DMkIII, and replace it by a new scare story about a camera that is
so far totally imaginary, with no statements at all from Canon
about it yet, let alone the detailed specs that you demand from
Olympus.
Strange, given that in 2006, Canon's market share shrunk and NikonAs for the ? to me of ware do i see everyone jumping to canon and moving away from Nikon.
And every week people are selling off the Nikon equipment and buying into canon.
closed the gap in market share. In part because the D200 has sold
far better than the 5D, not only in unit sales but probably in
gross revenues too.
But what has all this got to do with Olympus SLR's?The only common
theme to your posts is the to familiar "Canon rules, everyone else
is doomed, particularly Olympus" that we have read in thousands of
troll posts.
--
With larger pixels and sensors you must choose between bigger
glass, longer exposure times, lower resolution, or higher ISO
speeds that neutralize the noise advantages of larger pixels.
So what are your preferences? Are they still the same?Hi, I regularly do Oly/Nikon/Canon/Fuji comparisons what is better
for me.
Still my Oly E-330 is better for me than any Canon or Nikon when I
weight what are my preferences, but at my next comparision I will
add a negative point to Oly because of
promising-and-always-deliver-years-later. That does nt mean that I
will go canon/nikon/fuji but you are right, that IS REALLY a
negative point for Oly now. Oly should NOW RELEASE THE SPECIFICATION
--
regards
Martin