MIB
Leading Member
Hi Inigo,
I just took a look at your e100/UZI pic pair. They are consistent with what I found: e100 is sharper, more in focus, and better color.
I just took a look at your e100/UZI pic pair. They are consistent with what I found: e100 is sharper, more in focus, and better color.
--'MIB'A few quick clicks in PS can bring the UZI shot pretty much in line
with the E-100 one. I'm wondering if it was also shot at 1/30
how much closer the two would have been?
I did my own similar tests with the two cameras:
http://www.pbase.com/inigmntoya/e100_vs_c2100
With results reported in this thread:
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1008&message=2182868
http://www.pbase.com/image/1205940
http://www.pbase.com/image/1205948
Am I the only one noticing this ?
--My friend has purchased E100RS for $399 then because it was an open
box he got extra $15 from Frys Electronics. Their computer showed 4
total. I have really impressed him with my 2100 but when he saw and
then tried E100RS. His decision was made almost immediately.
Definitely E100 quality is superior to 2100. We tested the hot/dead
pixels at 10 seconds. The LCD screen was clean black at X3
magnification. It is very convenient to have two memory cards CF
and SM. The image on LSD and on a monitor screen was very very
clean.
Leo
'MIB'