[link] 30s exposure with SD14

that shows me the opposite of what i have seen until now. So i just have to wait and see some pictures more, because i love to take pictures from northern lights and this was impossible with the SD10. So might happen i do not move to Fuji....
--
waterlike
 
Is, MUCH better. I acually have complnaints it being a tad too small for my hands.. I have tried the vertical grip though and know that it will save my day.

Body is built as a high quality tool, really. It's well made and I've even been out in rain one time by misstake (it was soaked) but no problems.. The popup flash is very useful and no button to make it pop, it's more a drag and drop thing.. hehe..

All in all it's more like a D200 for those that knows that one.

--
Carl @ Rytterfalk .com (Göteborg, Sweden)
http://www.rytterfalk.com
Proud Sigma User.
 
The trick is to stay away from warm incandescent and fluorescent light (at least as your main light source). As long as mother nature makes the light you have WONDERFUL images. Full of life and colors! And this is where a 1-2min exposure time wouldn't be a big problem. ;) Any hackers out there?! Please do something!

Please tell me next time you go up north in sweden, Lappland or something.. I'm so impressed with your works from there.. I wanna try too. :D

--
Carl @ Rytterfalk .com (Göteborg, Sweden)
http://www.rytterfalk.com
Proud Sigma User.
 
Well I am no expert on this subject, but this does not sound like
binning to me, but a combination of binning and interpolation.
It's a floorwax! It's a dessert topping! (I'm showing my age.)
Its a breath mint, no its a candy mint. This actually is what the SNL skit was based on. (I am showing my age.
My
understanding of the term binning is combining detector data from
the wells at the hardware level.
Yes, the two adjacent sensor locations are combined at the HW
level. "The size and configuration of a pixel group are
variable—2x2, 4x4, 1x2, etc.—and are controlled through
sophisticated circuitry integrated into Foveon X3 direct image
sensors." Note they explicitly mention 1x2.
While interpolation is done at the software (or possibly firmware) level.
In this case SPP or Foveon libraries in other code. (dcraw does not
handle medium resolution.)
They are two very different things.
Yes they are, but that doesn't mean you can't use both in the same
mode.
The only objection I have to your explanation is the use of the
term pixel. In the context you are using it I would rather see the
term data point used.
I'm using the terms as Foveon uses them, e.g. "The VPS capability
allows signals from adjacent pixels to be combined into groups and
read as one larger pixel."
Well I have an objection to their use of the term pixel in that context too. And after I watched **** Lyons "Pixels and Me" video Ill bet he would object to pixel being used in that context.

Hard ware has detectors and wells, images have pixels. Sometimes there is a one to one correspondence between the two. But not with Bayer sensors or Foveon sensors. The only sensors I know of with a 1:1 correspondence are astrophotography B&W sensors that produce FITS files.
 
I am kinda anxious to get a 14, remove the IR block filter, set to low quality, and put it on one of my telescopes with a m42 adapter and see how it does on near IR images of stars.

Looks like I may be getting a 14 sooner, rather than later.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top