dearlyphoto
Leading Member
It's as much my call to make as it is yours. I repeat again for those who find it difficult to understand, I simply put your words on your childrens behaviour into one: ungratefulness.This really isn't your call to make. You blatantly criticized my
children (which is what calling them ungrateful would be). Now
you're attempting to justify it? That would be called audacity,
which makes you an audacious ass, one that is losing credibility
(that you really never had) the more you post.
As for justifying it? I don't have to - you already did which is the whole point. I'm not being audacious either, I stand by my original statement.
Lets get this straight, YOUR iPod isn't living up to whatever YOU expect of it. If it isn't living up to Apple's Specs return it. My iPod lives us to its specifications fine and functions perfectly after 3 months.As for how happy I am that my children don't like their two iPods
-- admittedly not very. However, they are not the problem -- the
iPods are the problem since they are not even living up to their
advertised feature list. Any time you use the screen and hard
drive a lot on an iPod Video, you can watch the battery drain like
a toilet flushing. But I'm sure it's still a great PSD since when
copying photos over to the iPod you wouldn't use the screen or hard
drive at all....uh...um.....DUH. That would be the missed obvious
logic part.
You can't guarantee anything of the sort. Unless your omniscient that is, which I doubt. Actually, my main preference for Apple products is their design and integrated functionality. That being said, I like my Nikon equipment as much as my Mac's. Like I said, I own shedloads of other manufacturer's items that can get the job done. What I choose to list in my signature is my choice.What makes you think anyone here cares what you do for a living?
It's obvious that your Apple inventory list in your signature line
is the primary reason for such a blind defense and recommendation
of using the iPod as a PSD. I can guarantee you if Apple came out
with a dSLR, you'd buy it immediately, and then come here to argue
with Nikon and Canon owners that the Apple dSLR is far superior and
they're just being deceitful about capabilities of the Apple dSLR.
You're a card-carrying Apple zealot. Just admit it, dude. You
live for this type of thread.
Not that this needs to be justified, but in a camera forum (where computer sub-forums do actually exist), it is helpful to list your equipment if you are ever in need of help so people know what you are using without you continually having to spell it out.This is a camera forum and you've felt the need to list your
computer and portable audio equipment in your signature? Why?
(that's a rhetorical question -- we already know the answer is that
you are an Apple zealot).
Only if you purchased her one for her birthday. I tend to more of the prescribing medication in my profession actually. As for the rest of it, blah blah blah...So stick the Apple decal on your forehead -- what do I care? I'm
sure that next you'll be telling me that my choice of automobiles
is deceitful or because my daughter doesn't like the latest Hyundai
lineup that she's ungrateful. Here's another presumption for you
to complain about: You need to get back on your medication.
And who says teenage children are the target audience for iPods? Those features aren't falsely advertised. If thats the case I'd get on to your local trading standards organisation.By mentioning my children I was simply (and clearly) illustrating
that even the target market for iPods (ie, teenaged children) don't
like them, even just for their falsely advertised audio and video
features.
David
--
Nikon D50 + 18 - 55mm, Fuijfilm F30, Epson R245, Canon CP400
iMac C2D 2.0Ghz, MacBook CD, Powerbook G4, iPod 5.5G 30GB.
http://www.davidjearly.com
http://www.abdnmug.co.uk