flash cards

robert so

New member
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Location
milford, MI, US
Has any body tried diffrent typs of cards in your d5 d7 to see if the prem is diffrent than a standerd sandisk card. There seems to be some diff on the cannon tes on this site how does it chang the minolta
 
Has any body tried diffrent typs of cards in your d5 d7 to see if
the prem is diffrent than a standerd sandisk card. There seems to
be some diff on the cannon tes on this site how does it chang the
minolta
Search this forum there are lots of threads on CF cards.

There are problems with certain cards from PQI and Mr Flash is you have the latest firmware. These cards are too slow for the cameras software and the result is corrupted pictures. Stick to scandisk and the like.--Pete
 
Search this forum there are lots of threads on CF cards.
There are problems with certain cards from PQI and Mr Flash is you
have the latest firmware. These cards are too slow for the cameras
software and the result is corrupted pictures. Stick to scandisk
and the like.
--
Pete
Has anyone tried the SanDisk Ultra or the Ridata CF cards with the 121 firmware? I think the SanDisk should be OK, but I am particularly interested in the Ridata and also the capacity that you are using.

Thanks!

--Pablettowww.pbase.com/pettas(samples taken with the MINOLTA DiMAGE 7)Last update 14 December 2001
 
Has anyone tried the SanDisk Ultra or the Ridata CF cards with the
121 firmware? I think the SanDisk should be OK, but I am
particularly interested in the Ridata and also the capacity that
you are using.

Thanks!
I am using Ridata 256mb w/firmware 121u - no prblem, works great, raw file writes in 13 sec.

Steven
 
Search this forum there are lots of threads on CF cards.
There are problems with certain cards from PQI and Mr Flash is you
have the latest firmware. These cards are too slow for the cameras
software and the result is corrupted pictures. Stick to scandisk
and the like.
--
Pete
Has anyone tried the SanDisk Ultra or the Ridata CF cards with the
121 firmware? I think the SanDisk should be OK, but I am
particularly interested in the Ridata and also the capacity that
you are using.

Thanks!
I am using both the 128 & 256 meg Ridata cards. Works fine, no problems to date.
John
--
Pabletto

http://www.pbase.com/pettas
(samples taken with the MINOLTA DiMAGE 7)
Last update 14 December 2001
 
Search this forum there are lots of threads on CF cards.
There are problems with certain cards from PQI and Mr Flash is you
have the latest firmware. These cards are too slow for the cameras
software and the result is corrupted pictures. Stick to scandisk
and the like.
--
Pete
Has anyone tried the SanDisk Ultra or the Ridata CF cards with the
121 firmware? I think the SanDisk should be OK, but I am
particularly interested in the Ridata and also the capacity that
you are using.

Thanks!

--
Pabletto

http://www.pbase.com/pettas
(samples taken with the MINOLTA DiMAGE 7)
Last update 14 December 2001
Ridata 128Mb with the 121 firmware : Ok, very quick (RAW = 14")

I just received an ExtreMemory 128M in exchange for a PQI 128M which didn't work; well, the ExtreMemory doesn't work either :-(
I can format it in the camera, but photos are corrupted.

--
Philippe
 
OK people,

Thanks for your input. Are your RIDATA cards faster than the others that you have tried in the D7? They are said to be 20x, but I do not think that is a true value.

I checked Phill's review, but I wonder how well they cope with the D7. Is there any significant difference in speed when compared to other cards?

--Pablettowww.pbase.com/pettas(samples taken with the MINOLTA DiMAGE 7)Last update 14 December 2001
 
Pabletto wrote:
Is there any significant difference in speed when compared to
other cards?
The Ridata is my fastest card. 13" for a RAW file. Lexar 12x 192mb is a second slower. Sandisk 128mb is the slowest - 24"! Lexar 8x (64mb and 128mb) are roughly 18 sec. All work very reliably.

Hope this helps.

Steven
 
From reports of users on Bryan's forum http://webpages.charter.net/bbiggers/DCExperiments/html/dimage_flash_card_speeds.html about 2/3 down the page, I believe that Kingston and Ridata are almost identical - if you look at the 256 mb cards, they are almost all between 12 and 13 seconds write time for raw files.

Tricia
OK people,
Thanks for your input. Are your RIDATA cards faster than the others
that you have tried in the D7? They are said to be 20x, but I do
not think that is a true value.
I checked Phill's review, but I wonder how well they cope with the
D7. Is there any significant difference in speed when compared to
other cards?

--
Pabletto

http://www.pbase.com/pettas
(samples taken with the MINOLTA DiMAGE 7)
Last update 14 December 2001
 
OK people,
Thanks for your input. Are your RIDATA cards faster than the others
that you have tried in the D7? They are said to be 20x, but I do
not think that is a true value.
I checked Phill's review, but I wonder how well they cope with the
D7. Is there any significant difference in speed when compared to
other cards?

--
Pabletto
Pabletto,

I am using the 128 and 256meg Ridata cards.
I think they are slightly overstated at 20x

I did check my card against a friends Lexar 12 or 16x card (don't remember which)
his was the 512 meg card (Paid arm and a leg for it)
My Ridata was a couple seconds faster on a RAW uncompressed file.

I am very happy with them. I am thinking of either a Ridata 512mb card or the Iomega 1gig Microdrive.
You will be very happy with the Ridata cards. No compatibility problems at all!
John
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top