Archival DVD's . . ?

i save 2 of everything on dvd.

they will outlive me.

used to do cd's, tape, hard drives.

no matter what you save your stuff on something better will come along.

a house fire can destroy all, so i keep copies in a different place.
 
I burn everything on DVD. I use any name brand, makes no difference
because I backup everything every two years. Most name brand DVD’s
last over five years and cost less then 50 cent each.

My workflow is to dump everything on the hardrive from the camera.
Filter and delete what I don’t want. Then I dump a copy of the
“pics to keep” on a secondary hardrive (in case one false). At the
end of the year I burn two copies of the same Dvd and label it with
the year and the year it needs to be reburned (one copy stays at
home the other goes to work, in case of fire). If I need more then
one DVD I simply label them: 1 of 2 (2006), reburn in 2008. So in
two years when it’s time to burn a new DVD I will check to see
which DVD’s need to be rebruned.

I find this work flow to be flexible with the upcoming technology
and cheep on the long run. If the media becomes more stable I will
simply reburn them less often. If the media’s size grows then I
will simply consolidate several DVD’s/years together.

Oh, I keep all dvd’s in single case per each DVD to prevent them
from scratching.
. . . . . I need to think about "re-burning" as an alternative. My
initial impression is that (for me) it would be fraught with other
problems . . like forgetting to do it. And, my kids want me to
leave them my photo files and gear when it's time. Then what ?
I'm in the middle of re-burning right now. I burn 3 sets of DVDs, each set coming from different media batches. I try to reburn the whole album once a year (taking the DVD to a second computer to check every file for correctness), and I'm about 2/3 done. At the moment, my album takes 18 DVD's (come on Blu-Ray, get those prices down so I can put the album on 3-4 blu-ray disks). Note, I still keep the files on disks in the computers in the house. In addition to the DVD, I have one external disk, and I'm thinking about going to 2 disks rotated between the office and house, and dropping the multiple DVD copies.

The trouble with disks is if you get corruption and you don't notice it for awhile, you will eventually corrupt the removable disks used in rotation.
 
i save 2 of everything on dvd.

they will outlive me.
You didn't say what brand of media/burner/etc. you use. I stored disks on DVD, and keep a copy at my office. One day, I was participating in one of these discussions, and pulled off the first disk in the collection that I burned in September 2005, and it is no longer readable. So unless you had an incurable illness you might think twice about making statements about them outliving you.
used to do cd's, tape, hard drives.

no matter what you save your stuff on something better will come
along.

a house fire can destroy all, so i keep copies in a different place.
Yep, that's why with 2 external disks, you put one copy in a remote location. If I had a much faster internet connection, I would just upload everything to my web co-hosting site, which gives me 200 gigabytes of storage space currently (my album is currently about 70 gigabytes).
 
. . . . have been around for several years, Larry. Problem is, I
dunno how much longer they'll last. You?

Best . . . .

Paul
Vancouver, WA . . . (USA)
I figure I'll just re-burn 'em every few years (as a bonus the media gets cheaper each time around)

I really dont trust 'em to last much more than 3 years.

--

Put one hand on each cheek..Now the solution to better photography is in your hands

Larry Lynch
Mystic, Ct.
 
Agreed, this is a good route, more reliable than DVD and cheap.

In everything important, get 2 or 3 backups. HD backups are good in that you are more likely to know when it goes wrong (because they are connected to your computer and you can click on them). DVDs you only find out if you make the special effort to test them.
 
HD prices have plummeted so far that for me it made sense in these ways:

(1) Multiple backups are simple to do
(2) Refreshing a complete backup is simple to do
(3) No need to manage many, many pieces of media

It flat out saves me a lot of time!

I have the originals and three HD backups. About 750BG total image data.

DVDs may still be less expensive to start with, but if you are concerned about longevity, and plan to do refreshes by burning copies in the future, that cost advantage eventually vanishes.

I think DVDs are great for sharing photos and sending large images to a printer or such - or temporary storage. They just do not figure into my long term strategy.

--
Best Regards,
Mark Devine
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top