P880 - latest firmware.

Will O

Leading Member
Messages
697
Reaction score
0
Location
Anglesey, UK
Ever since updating my P880 with the latest firmware (v.1.02), I have suspected my results to be (ever so slightly!) poorer than what I was achieving with the original firmware. But can that be possible? Perhaps it's just my imagination, however, I would like to know if anyone else has had the same feeling.

Regards,
Will O.
 
What do you define as "poorer" results?
--
-- The answer to your question is 43! --
Rich
Hi Rich,

By "poorer", I suppose I meant a bit noisier (or more blurred) when cropping & enlarging (which is something I do a lot of). I just felt that some of the pre-firmware updating shots stood up to that sort of treatment a little bit better. There again, like I said, maybe just my imagination. I just wondered if anyone else had had the same suspicions. By the way, I'm not sure what you mean with: "The answer to your question is 43! --"

Will O
 
What do you define as "poorer" results?
--
-- The answer to your question is 43! --
Rich
Hi Rich,

By "poorer", I suppose I meant a bit noisier (or more blurred) when
cropping & enlarging (which is something I do a lot of). I just
felt that some of the pre-firmware updating shots stood up to that
sort of treatment a little bit better. There again, like I said,
maybe just my imagination. I just wondered if anyone else had had
the same suspicions.
I sure haven't noticed any differences. Your description would indicate a focusing problem or camera shake, or it could be the ISO setting. I think the upgrade may reset the settings, so you may want to check the ISO setting, the low light infared focus setting, and other items that may have been changed. It's possible you have just had different lighting conditions before and after, so you are getting different exposure settings, especially if you are using automatic settings.
By the way, I'm not sure what you mean with:
"The answer to your question is 43! --"
This is from Douglas Adams, author of the "Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" series. In one book in the series, "Deep Thought", the most massive computer ever built, is asked to solve the answer to "Life, the Universe, and Everything". After pondering for thousands of years, the answer was:
"43"....
--> Rich
 
Hi Rich,

I've made some more tests and, yes, I think you could be right when you say it might have been due to different lighting conditions etc. Thanks also for explaining the "43" bit!

Cheers,
Will O
 
Hi Rich,

I've made some more tests and, yes, I think you could be right when
you say it might have been due to different lighting conditions
etc. Thanks also for explaining the "43" bit!
Cheers,
Will O
No problem!

I don't know what your experience level is, but taking lots of pictures and testing is always a good thing. What I love most about digital is it doesn't really cost anything to take alot of pictures. Most will be bad; some will be good; a few will be great!

It takes quite a while to get familiar enough with the camera to know when you will/won't get a good picture. I had to force myself to take a series of tests, varying settings a little at a time, recording the results, and later viewing the pictures. This helped me alot to get used to the camera and make fewer technical mistakes. But I still forget to set something sometimes. This in spite of the fact I've had other dcams and 35mm SLRs.

Rich
 
I don't know what your experience level is, but taking lots of
pictures and testing is always a good thing.
My experience level is really quite low, having just started dabbling with the various settings that are available on digital cameras - after always relying entirely on Auto, P&S sort of picture taking.
It takes quite a while to get familiar enough with the camera to
know when you will/won't get a good picture.
You're telling me! No scene is quite the same from one day to the next (or even from one hour to the next) due to variations in the level of available light etc., which means that one is constantly having to experiment with the camera's settings to get the best possible shot. I can see that it really is very much a case of trial & error!

Mant thanks again,
Will O
 
totally agree.

It's free go and practice, now that would be about 10,000 images of motorsport before getting it consistently right ;) but yes practice, change a setting, practice, observe results, repeat :)
--

Got a DX, taken a shot, blank EVF ? no worries, use the shutter button the camera can still take pictures, even if you can't see.
 
Ever since updating my P880 with the latest firmware (v.1.02), I
have suspected my results to be (ever so slightly!) poorer than
what I was achieving with the original firmware. But can that be
possible? Perhaps it's just my imagination, however, I would like
to know if anyone else has had the same feeling.

Regards,
Will O.
My experience is that I thought I had throwen money away when I bought the camera. After upgrading I knew that wasn't true.

The main purpose of the firmware was

"This firmware version provides the following improvements:
  • Reduced Shutter button lag for better picture taking performance.
  • Improved Auto Focus.
  • Improved Auto Exposure performance.
  • On camera red-eye reduction in review mode."
If the above was OK in your camera before upgrading. Why did you upgrade?

My camera did improved using the upgrade.

--
Minolta Z10 / Kodak P880 v1.02
 
The main purpose of the firmware was
  • Reduced Shutter button lag for better picture taking performance.
  • Improved Auto Focus.
  • Improved Auto Exposure performance.
  • On camera red-eye reduction in review mode."
If the above was OK in your camera before upgrading. Why did you
upgrade?
I guess that we can't always be 100% certain what "OK" really is - e.g. can something be made even better? Although the above items may have seemed ok to me at the time, it was very much a case of 'what if...' What if things could be made even better with an update? This, of course, is something that we never know until we try.

Moreover, everyone nowadays rants on and on about how important it is to update to the latest firmware version. This is very much the case with electronic music instruments (my other hobby) and I just thought the same applies to digital cameras as well. Anyhow, like I've said before, I reckon it could have just been my imagination at the time - all seems well since.

Regards,
Will
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top