New Fuji cameras announced!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ulysses
  • Start date Start date
This makes me think - is there a reason IR laser range finding
couldn't be used for focus? Range the target, adjust the focus,
done - would be REALLY FAST. I really have no idea what it would
You'd need a way of knowing exactly what the laser is hitting otherwise, it would be hard know whether you're focusing on a person or just over the person's shoulder, for example.

We purchased a laser rangefinder for our robot. It's fancier than what you're describing since it does 180 degree sweeps. It cost $9K. Even if the problem of knowing what one is focusing on is solved, I have to wonder if the cost would be prohibitive.
entail or if it is even feasible. Do laser rangefinders require a
reflection back to the source?
Maybe I'm not understanding the question here, so I'm sorry if this is off base but: Let's say I want to do something (anything) with a laser. I can point the laser at an object, but if I never notice was has happened as a result of my pointing the laser at the object, how can I hope to draw any conclusions from this experiment?

--Ron ParrFAQ: http://www.cs.duke.edu/~parr/photography/faq.htmlGallery: http://www.pbase.com/parr/
 
I'm drinking wine and typing "?" instead of "-" :-) . The point about shooting from the hip with preview -- IMO is from point and shooters ? which is ok for everyday shots--but when you look through viewfinder of D30 at long range with center point spot focus and you see the ss and f stop in the viewfinder and clarity of what you're shooting -- then one can understand the need for an eyepiece to shoot in focus high quality pics at long range. When 3.4 meg RAW files are converted to ~ 20meg 16 bit tiff files ? and you can adjust and recover settings with RAW ?then folks will understand quality. If I had it to do over again, I'd skip the 505v, I think I spent 1300 with extras in Feb of 2001. 1940 buys the D30 box from Delta. If I didn?t have extra money, I?d buy one lens ?50mm f1.4 for $340 ? one of the sharpest lens in the world-- and shoot with MD $270 for many months until I had enough money to buy the rest?but what the $1300 and this forum taught me was ? I wanted more with more quality.

Your info web site was a great idea?lots of hits out there?I use it from time to time -- thanks.

I?m not trying to be bragging ? I just wanted more ? and several folks in this forum really deserve to experience more quality ? you, Shay and Uly to name a few I?ll follow because I like your photos and knowledge ?but the workarounds are too compromising for me. If STF friends ever need advice on buying Canon equipment, I now can direct them to resources. You'd like canon IMO. All the best.

Kind regards,
MAC
The sidewinder approach to my 505v was nice for point and shoot,
but if you want high quality pics at long range, a viewfinder only
way to go IMO ? you need to see it through the viewfinder center
point to get this kind of clarity ? 75 yards away. D30, 70 ? 200
F2.8
Sorry, MAC, I'm just not following you...

--
Ron Parr
FAQ: http://www.cs.duke.edu/~parr/photography/faq.html
Gallery: http://www.pbase.com/parr/
 
and typing ? marks for some reason --sorry.

MAC
 
Keep in mind that a Hasselblad body and lens can be had for less
than that price. Keep in mnd that a Canon F2 body is under $800.
What we're talking about here is the lowered resistance to prices
in the thousands of dollars range. I have a Nikon N60 with a couple
of Nikon Speedlites that I spent less than $1000 on. I never
thought I'd be spending as much money for a camera as I did for my
F707 and accessories.
Raymond -

You make an EXCELLENT point, one regarding which I've been trying to search myself.

You hit it on the head: "lowered resistance to prices".

It's a certain thing that not only have digicam manufacturers been trying to gradually build market leadership with their own brands and product functionality, but they've also been trying to train the public to ACCEPT the prices of $800+ as being 'just what you are going to pay' for this type and class of product.

Like yourself, I didn't think I'd ever pay this much money for a camera - film or digital - period! My very first digicam nearly broke the bank, costing me a whole $600 for a mere 2.1 megapixel model without any real control to speak of. I thought it was the last camera I'd own.

And now, having been "trained" by the industry, I actively tell my wife that "eventually, I'm going to have to get another one."

What in the world???? :-(

I'm sure that by tomorrow morning, this brief oasis of clarity will have passed me by. -- Ulysses
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top