Mpix Labs experience and recommendation

Redcrown

Senior Member
Messages
2,024
Solutions
7
Reaction score
683
Location
US
A report on Mpix Labs prints.

About once a month there is a post asking for recommendations for "on-line" printing labs. The most recent led me to test Mpix. Received my first "test" prints today, and they are outstanding. Details follow.

I started using pro labs about 7 years ago. Tested about 6 different labs, local and mail order, and picked American Color Imaging (ACI) in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Mostly for wallet prints of seniors. ACI produces excellent and consistent quality at reasonable prices, but their "on-line" process requires special software that is unattractive to me. It's burdened with many options about film, retouching, and "packages" that I never use, so I never used it. Have been mailing CDs to them.

I started the Mpix process late Wednesday morning. Took about 2 hours to open an account, review and understand how it works, pick test images, upload, and order. Finished about 2:00pm. At 9:30pm the same day I received Mpix e-mail notices that two of my orders had shipped. At 9:30pm the next day, Thursday, I received e-mail notice that my 3rd order had shipped. The first 2 orders had "no color correction", the third had the same images with color correction. It appeared that color correction takes an extra day.

On Friday, in my 1:30pm USPS mail delivery, all three orders arrived. Total time from order to receipt was 48 hours. But to be fair, I live in Des Moines, IA, and the Mpix lab is in Columbia, MO, which is pretty close.

So much for the service, how about the quality?

Quality was outstanding, equal to or greater than my old source. I submitted portrait, landscape, and still-life images. Ordered identical prints with and without Mpix color correction, plus two monochromes - one "true" B&W and one with a "platimum" tone, both submitted as RGB. I also ordered 3 color prints on the Kodak "Metallic" paper, which I've never seen before.

The color corrected and non-corrected landscape and still-life images are identical in color, tone and contrast. And they match about perfect to my own prints from an Epson 2200. This is good news, and as it should be from my calibrated system. I rarely check the "soft proof" in Photoshop, and never make custom edits based on the soft proof. Like most, I want prints to match my calibrated monitor as closely as possible without a bunch of extra work.

One of the portraits I submitted had a slight yellow color cast. The un-corrected print from Mpix maintained the color cast and matched my monitor and Epson print. The color corrected Mpix print accurately removed the color cast and gave excellent skin tone.

The monochrome portrait prints are also excellent. The "true" B&W print appears to be very neutral in tone. The "platinum" tone came through fine on the other. No problem with either.

The Metallic prints are "interesting", but not for my taste. I've never cared for glossy prints, and these are just another form of glossy. Also, the Metallics are darker in tone, about 1 full stop I'd guess. But that appears to be a result of the paper stock. Easy to see in the blank white border, which appears light gray on the Metallic print.

I've scoped all the prints with a loupe, looking for banding, posterization, or sharpness issues. Can't find any problems. Now add that Mpix prices are about 10% to 20% less than my old pro lab, and you've got a converted customer.

My only complaint, but it seems common to all on-line labs, is the need to make separate orders (any pay extra shipping). Mpix paper choice and color correction options are "global" per order. So I had to make 3 orders to get luster vs. metallic paper and color corrected vs. non color corrected prints. $15 shipping instead of $5. Also, those choices appear at the end of the order process, which I found confusing. I backed out of the order process twice and went back to the Help/FAQ trying to find where to set those options.
 
I've heard that they are good too. I personally use Kodak and find them very reasonable, but I may have to look into Mpix again.

C
 
I use Mpix and agree they are very good, and very fast.

The metallic paper works good with saturated images. It is not for all images, but only for images suitable for that method. Unfortunately, you have to experiment to figure out what you like.
--
Rick
 
I started using them a few months ago. I've gotten several prints, several mounted prints, and a poster that was mounted. I love them They turned out beautiful.
--
Roberta D'Achille
 
I found the sign up less troubling than you apparently did and I agree about the extra shipping for different "type" orders. But I will say that after about 6 or 7 orders, I am VERY PLEASED. Time. quality, color......all very good, so the little extra is worth it.
--
‹(•¿•)› Dave in NW Louisiana
 
Just tried MPix first time, for large prints: 16x14 and 20x30. Turned out well, but a little dark. That seems to be common for all print (had similar issue printing a book at Blurb). Can anyone suggesta simple algorithm or PS action to prep images for printing?

Thanks
--
SS
 
Saul,

Pics printing "a little dark" is a common result of a poorly calibrated monitor. With a good monitor, well calibrated, you should not have to "prep images for printing." My test prints at Mpix actually came out a little brighter, but ever so slightly.

If you have not calibrated your monitor, by all means do so. And "Adobe Gamma" does not count. Get a calibration device.

One tip: look for a local camera club and join. Many camera clubs share calibraton tools, or have "technical" members that will come to you home and help you get calibrated. I've done about 6 monitors and have yet to see one that was even close before calibration.
 
Saul,

Pics printing "a little dark" is a common result of a poorly
calibrated monitor. With a good monitor, well calibrated, you
should not have to "prep images for printing." My test prints at
Mpix actually came out a little brighter, but ever so slightly.

If you have not calibrated your monitor, by all means do so. And
"Adobe Gamma" does not count. Get a calibration device.

One tip: look for a local camera club and join. Many camera clubs
share calibraton tools, or have "technical" members that will come
to you home and help you get calibrated. I've done about 6 monitors
and have yet to see one that was even close before calibration.
What tool do you recommend for calibrating a monitor?

--
Bryan V.
P.S. I've had amnesia for as long as I can remember.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top