CP5K Owners - Vote, Pro or Con

I do agree, but zpixxx, P.Ong, and Bud Hines will never give up....To them we are nothing but Nikon Lemmings who blindly love our CP5000s.....

They just love to post wasteful bashing comments that have no merit.

Teski
All right, I accept the fact that you love Sony and absolutely hate
Nikon for what they've done (I happen to like some products from
both of them), but you really have to get over your obsession with
trying to discredit the CP5000 with such ridiculous exaggerations.
Printing to 11x14 size is not everyone's cup of tea. I seldom need
more than 8x10. So it's no reason to dump 1k for me. If that's
the ultimate goal, you'd be better off w/ a D30 or D1x.

The purple fringing on backlit scenes from this camera is obscene!
My Sony trv9000 camcorder produces better stills than this thing.
And my cp990 beats it hands down.

This camera is not ready for prime time yet! It was prematurely
rushed to market and everyone knows it. The fact that everyone
keeps making excuses for it proves the dis-satisfaction.

It is idiotic to not be able to cancel the pre-flash for studio
work. And No, I'm not interested in a work around solution. This
camera should have addressed this problem from the start.
Otherwise, don't be whistling pro-sumer my way!

Keep on tweaking Nikon or pro-rate me the cost of this amateurish
camera.
zpixxx
Vote? Sure I'll give you a vote - how about a resounding "NO!"

My CP990 is every bit as good a camera - and a lot less money to boot.

Wish I hadn't spent the money.

Regards,
  • Geoff
That's sad. Two more megapixels (1.8 really) and the superior color
found in the 995 didn't hook it for you, eh? Pity.

I really like the 990 and the 995 and the 5000. But the 5000 has a
few drawbacks. Extending lens, funny pre-flash when using Nikon
flash units in the hot shoe, Clear Image mode currently
dysfunctional. But then the 990 wasn't very wide at full wide,
didn't have a hot shoe to get into trouble with, and never
pretended to have CI mode.

Pop Sci voted the 5K as its camera of the year. But I guess that
can't compete with Time Magazine's COTY for the 990.

Now shoot the same subject with the 990 and the 5000 with the lens
set to the same relative magnification and print both images out at
11 X14. See? It > is

-iNova
 
Peter,

Printing to 11x14 size is not everyone's cup of tea. I seldom need
more than 8x10. So it's no reason to dump 1k for me. If that's
the ultimate goal, you'd be better off w/ a D30 or D1x.

The purple fringing on backlit scenes from this camera is obscene!
My Sony trv9000 camcorder produces better stills than this thing.
And my cp990 beats it hands down.

This camera is not ready for prime time yet! It was prematurely
rushed to market and everyone knows it. The fact that everyone
keeps making excuses for it proves the dis-satisfaction.
Premature? I thought it was delayed for a month. What excuses? I now find this camera perfect, to me! Thats it. Why you sound like you bothered by the fact that there are a lot of people who really like the camera? Don't blame Nikon with an overpriced CP5000. As you mentioned in this same thread, blame yourself who bought it. And, you are obviously very upset. I am sorry for you.
It is idiotic to not be able to cancel the pre-flash for studio
work. And No, I'm not interested in a work around solution. This
camera should have addressed this problem from the start.
Otherwise, don't be whistling pro-sumer my way!

Keep on tweaking Nikon or pro-rate me the cost of this amateurish
camera.
zpixxx
Vote? Sure I'll give you a vote - how about a resounding "NO!"

My CP990 is every bit as good a camera - and a lot less money to boot.

Wish I hadn't spent the money.

Regards,
  • Geoff
That's sad. Two more megapixels (1.8 really) and the superior color
found in the 995 didn't hook it for you, eh? Pity.

I really like the 990 and the 995 and the 5000. But the 5000 has a
few drawbacks. Extending lens, funny pre-flash when using Nikon
flash units in the hot shoe, Clear Image mode currently
dysfunctional. But then the 990 wasn't very wide at full wide,
didn't have a hot shoe to get into trouble with, and never
pretended to have CI mode.

Pop Sci voted the 5K as its camera of the year. But I guess that
can't compete with Time Magazine's COTY for the 990.

Now shoot the same subject with the 990 and the 5000 with the lens
set to the same relative magnification and print both images out at
11 X14. See? It > is

-iNova
--Amy
 
Size ain't everything. I do have images that you could not distinguish from the cp5000 and you'll prefer them. That is if I didn't tell you which was taken w/ which.

But just when you think you know it all, let me assure you that I have a larger collection of Nikon photographic equipment than you and most people posting on this page.

And that's a fact Jack!

zpixxx
All right, I accept the fact that you love Sony and absolutely hate
Nikon for what they've done (I happen to like some products from
both of them), but you really have to get over your obsession with
trying to discredit the CP5000 with such ridiculous exaggerations.
Printing to 11x14 size is not everyone's cup of tea. I seldom need
more than 8x10. So it's no reason to dump 1k for me. If that's
the ultimate goal, you'd be better off w/ a D30 or D1x.

The purple fringing on backlit scenes from this camera is obscene!
My Sony trv9000 camcorder produces better stills than this thing.
And my cp990 beats it hands down.

This camera is not ready for prime time yet! It was prematurely
rushed to market and everyone knows it. The fact that everyone
keeps making excuses for it proves the dis-satisfaction.

It is idiotic to not be able to cancel the pre-flash for studio
work. And No, I'm not interested in a work around solution. This
camera should have addressed this problem from the start.
Otherwise, don't be whistling pro-sumer my way!

Keep on tweaking Nikon or pro-rate me the cost of this amateurish
camera.
zpixxx
Vote? Sure I'll give you a vote - how about a resounding "NO!"

My CP990 is every bit as good a camera - and a lot less money to boot.

Wish I hadn't spent the money.

Regards,
  • Geoff
That's sad. Two more megapixels (1.8 really) and the superior color
found in the 995 didn't hook it for you, eh? Pity.

I really like the 990 and the 995 and the 5000. But the 5000 has a
few drawbacks. Extending lens, funny pre-flash when using Nikon
flash units in the hot shoe, Clear Image mode currently
dysfunctional. But then the 990 wasn't very wide at full wide,
didn't have a hot shoe to get into trouble with, and never
pretended to have CI mode.

Pop Sci voted the 5K as its camera of the year. But I guess that
can't compete with Time Magazine's COTY for the 990.

Now shoot the same subject with the 990 and the 5000 with the lens
set to the same relative magnification and print both images out at
11 X14. See? It > is

-iNova
 
Why not? Because he was asking OWNERS for their opinion. Besides, did you think the feedback was predictable here? Everything from "Love it!" to "Piece of S* ".

Anyway, I vote YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That's all well and good in a 'Nikon Talk' forum where the feedback
is predictable. Why not post this in the 'Open Forum' where we can
see some real unbiased opinions.

--
http://www.pbase.com/briand
 
Amy,

Premature as in releasing a product w/out ironing out the flaws. Must I remind you of the early firmware release which would lock your camera if booted up w/ the cap on?

I'm not bothered at all. I'm disappointed w/ the hype and promise of that camera and have every right to vote my way.

Are you afraid to express your dislikes for fear that the Nikon God's won't sell you the next releases? I'm sure they could care less what you do or say as long as you've already sent in your check.

BTW, I've been a Nikon man long before Nikon was cool. So Chill out baby!

I'm still using my other NIKON stuff! Happy now?
zpixxx
This camera is not ready for prime time yet! It was prematurely
rushed to market and everyone knows it. The fact that everyone
keeps making excuses for it proves the dis-satisfaction.
Premature? I thought it was delayed for a month. What excuses? I
now find this camera perfect, to me! Thats it. Why you sound like
you bothered by the fact that there are a lot of people who really
like the camera? Don't blame Nikon with an overpriced CP5000. As
you mentioned in this same thread, blame yourself who bought it.
And, you are obviously very upset. I am sorry for you.
It is idiotic to not be able to cancel the pre-flash for studio
work. And No, I'm not interested in a work around solution. This
camera should have addressed this problem from the start.
Otherwise, don't be whistling pro-sumer my way!

Keep on tweaking Nikon or pro-rate me the cost of this amateurish
camera.
zpixxx
Vote? Sure I'll give you a vote - how about a resounding "NO!"

My CP990 is every bit as good a camera - and a lot less money to boot.

Wish I hadn't spent the money.

Regards,
  • Geoff
That's sad. Two more megapixels (1.8 really) and the superior color
found in the 995 didn't hook it for you, eh? Pity.

I really like the 990 and the 995 and the 5000. But the 5000 has a
few drawbacks. Extending lens, funny pre-flash when using Nikon
flash units in the hot shoe, Clear Image mode currently
dysfunctional. But then the 990 wasn't very wide at full wide,
didn't have a hot shoe to get into trouble with, and never
pretended to have CI mode.

Pop Sci voted the 5K as its camera of the year. But I guess that
can't compete with Time Magazine's COTY for the 990.

Now shoot the same subject with the 990 and the 5000 with the lens
set to the same relative magnification and print both images out at
11 X14. See? It > is

-iNova
--
Amy
 
Richard M Jones wrote:
Besides, did you think the feedback was predictable here? Everything from
"Love it!" to "Piece of S* ".
Anyway, I vote YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hahaha! Telll 'em Richard!
zpixxx
 
Just out of curiosity....WHY DO YOU CARE???? It's obvious that you are a Canon person by your posts. Why do you care that someone, who is excited about their new camera (heaven forbid that it's not a Canon), wants to see if those who have also purchased the camera are happy. Not people that played with it in the store....Not people that only read the reviews and looked at the pics....The people that actually own the camera and know what it does or doesn't based on experience.

Those that own this camera are on this forum, so this is the perfect place for this subject. Putting it on the open forum means you might as well post this on the Canon and Sony forums and watch everyone, who so badly want this camera to fail, bash it based solely on what they read....Again, no experience.

Teski
That's all well and good in a 'Nikon Talk' forum where the feedback
is predictable. Why not post this in the 'Open Forum' where we can
see some real unbiased opinions.

--
http://www.pbase.com/briand
 
most of the people on this tread cannot follow simple instructions. What does that tell you about their ability to evaluate a camera?
Those that own this camera are on this forum, so this is the
perfect place for this subject. Putting it on the open forum means
you might as well post this on the Canon and Sony forums and watch
everyone, who so badly want this camera to fail, bash it based
solely on what they read....Again, no experience.

Teski
That's all well and good in a 'Nikon Talk' forum where the feedback
is predictable. Why not post this in the 'Open Forum' where we can
see some real unbiased opinions.

--
http://www.pbase.com/briand
 
Hey Jerry,
Why don't you take a long walk on a short pier?
Those that own this camera are on this forum, so this is the
perfect place for this subject. Putting it on the open forum means
you might as well post this on the Canon and Sony forums and watch
everyone, who so badly want this camera to fail, bash it based
solely on what they read....Again, no experience.

Teski
That's all well and good in a 'Nikon Talk' forum where the feedback
is predictable. Why not post this in the 'Open Forum' where we can
see some real unbiased opinions.

--
http://www.pbase.com/briand
--Franco
 
Is that the most intelligent thing you can think of? And you are a CP 5000 owner? That figures.
Those that own this camera are on this forum, so this is the
perfect place for this subject. Putting it on the open forum means
you might as well post this on the Canon and Sony forums and watch
everyone, who so badly want this camera to fail, bash it based
solely on what they read....Again, no experience.

Teski
That's all well and good in a 'Nikon Talk' forum where the feedback
is predictable. Why not post this in the 'Open Forum' where we can
see some real unbiased opinions.

--
http://www.pbase.com/briand
--
Franco
 
Although I decided to go with the G2 (after a lot of hesitations- after all - I am ((was)) a Nikonain), I still think that the CP5000 is a great camera and I'me almost certain it will improve with new firmware upgrades.

I want to thank the wonderful people on this forum, I've leared a lot here and will keep on visiting - with your permission :-)
Lets all enjoy our camers,
I vote PRO
Ido
 
Yes-- I own a 990 (still use it), but the 5000 is definately an improvement. Even if you feel the 990 is as good a camera and takes the same pictures as the 5000, I will tell you then it is worth the upgrade just to be able to use the UR-E5 adapter for the 5000. It has (finally) allowed me to use my collection of filters from my other cameras, filters that were hopelessly too big for my 990. I love the 5000's wide angle lens, really draws you in to your subject, if you want to zoom, put on a Teleconverter or such and you'll be quite happy with the results. This camera has opened up quite a few of the possibilities of expansion my trusty 990 could not deliver on. Enjoy whatever camera you own, get off the fence if you don't own one. Instead of waiting for the rest of the world to pass you by. Purchase one (any camera you like) because waiting for that perfect camera will keep you from enjoying what digital photography has to offer here and now.

Rob
 
Haha, I know! You can always count on them to rear their heads in every post with their negativity.

Oh well, I think most people can tell what kind of people they are by looking at their post history.

Regards,
Sean
I'm sure the usual trolls like Bud Hines, P.Ong, and Zipixx will be
along sometime soon to make some unproductive bash on the camera
and this thread. Nevermind them....They just like to start it
up.....

Teski
Yes to me Phil's review was a dissapointment and somewhat
surprising based on tests I have done with the various cameras,
especially the G2. But he was accurate and honest for the most
part. Highlights ARE blown out sometimes, and it does sometimes
look like video for that reason, but a good photgrapher can correct
things like that easily. And Nikon could easily fix that in a
firmware upgrade if enough of us complain. But the positives far
outweigh the negatives. I knew the Sony had more resolving power
than the 5000 from the beginning if people remember my resolution
tests I posted on here. But the sony had its share of negatives
too. Bad jaggies on diagonal lines, and moire patterns. And you can
see this in the images and in the prints the Sony makes sometimes.
To me the smoother lines make the resulting prints look more
natural to me... more like film. Professional printing companies
agree. I have heard more than one person comment on my prints
looking more like film than other digital camer prints they have
seen including the sony 707. Some people say the images look
softer. Not in my experience, andl not in prints. Sharp as a tack
and very film like. As for the G2, it is a great camera, but there
is no way anyone can tell me it resolves as much detail as the CP
5000! I have tested this like crazy with online images and with my
friend's G2. There is no comparison, the CP is sharper, period, no
contest. (however I do wonder if there are some lemons out there
because some peoples images with the CP 5000 really are soft and
not sharp as a tack, but mine is not one of those thank goodnes)
Everyone should judge the cameras for themselves. You cannot go
wrong with ANY of the big three names right now... Canon, Sony and
Nikon are the best of the best, and it is nitpicking differences
that set them apart. So minor they are practically insignificant. I
think Phil would agree with that. Remember, it is the Photographer
that makes a good picture, NOT the Camera. Now get out there and
take the best pictures you can with whatever camera you like. I am
going to take some more with my CP 5000 :).
I was wondering if the majority of CP5K owners are happy or unhappy
with their cameras. Maybe we could try a vote. If anyone
interested, owners only, could vote once and once only. If you are
overall satisfied with your camera vote YES and if unhappy vote NO.
Then add your vote to the appropriate total to increment it. Let's
see if we can unscientifically see where most owners stand.

I'll vote first: YES

Totals: YES 1 No 0
The first 2 weeks I thought I have to return it.
Now, it is the best pro-sumer digital camera I ever came across.
Yes.
--
Amy
 
Teski, The image quality I see is inconsistent. I have had some spectacular pictures (in macro, and in close-ups -color rendition is fantastic), and I have had pictures I retch over. For example, I had taken pictures in a local park of the treeline, about 300 ft away. Long story short, the twigs at the tip of the trees (with gray overcast for backdrop) had decent definition (at 100% viewing), the lower branches which had snow on them had good definition. In between them, it was just a smudge of red. No definition of branches, just blotchy red. The branches were certainly larger than the twigs at the tops. When I voted NO, I was not comparing it to any other camera -I couldn't care less about others, I was comparing it to my expectations of a 1100$ camera. I wasn't expecting perfection, I wasn't expecting what I had seen either.

The camera is going on a tour of the NY service center :-) Hopefully up on return, it will be as good as yours and those of all who voted YES. I sure want it to be.
Teski
Teski
You stole my comment!!!

Nikon, fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me!

zpixxx
My CP990 is every bit as good a camera - and a lot less money to boot.

Wish I hadn't spent the money.

Regards,
  • Geoff
I was wondering if the majority of CP5K owners are happy or unhappy
with their cameras. Maybe we could try a vote. If anyone
interested, owners only, could vote once and once only. If you are
overall satisfied with your camera vote YES and if unhappy vote NO.
Then add your vote to the appropriate total to increment it. Let's
see if we can unscientifically see where most owners stand.

I'll vote first: YES

Totals: YES 1 No 0
--
  • Geoff.
Hi your wrong
I have conclusive proof my 995 isn't every bit as good as the 5000
Where do you get that from?
--
Thomas
http://www.ycsphoto.com
 
I am very happy with my cp5k. They said that this one wasn’t for beginners but I have found it a breeze to experiment with all the menu settings and playing around with it. I am really happy with my handheld shots/snapshots (ignoring technical/advanced stuff like composition & artistic flair etc etc) … purchased a tripod & a few filters recently so will be doing more experimenting & playing around :)

Also should mention that I am waiting on a replacement for mine which has one hot pixel … Teds Camera here in Melbourne Australia provide great service! In the meantime I get to play with my existing one ... I hope the new one is just as good (minus the hot pixel!)

Is pbase gonna still be free? I would like to post some pics for comments & suggestions.

Please put me down for a big YES.

Kha
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top