I do not aggree with price it must be 2 timese chipperfor a K110D price
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I do not aggree with price it must be 2 timese chipperfor a K110D price
Uh, I don't think you realize how hard it would be to miniaturize the K10D's magnetics (SR), electronics (22-bit D/A, SSM, 10MP) and pentaprism to fit in a *ist DL and reduce the price to K110D level (half current K10D price) all at once. Reducing price by a further factor of two will be impossible, IMHO.I do not aggree with price it must be 2 timese chipperfor a K110D price
Price is not so much established by the price-desire of the consumer - instead more by the competition and the feature-desire of the consumer !!! In this regard K100D is already VERY aggressive and it make A LOT MORE SENSE to aim for some profits and decent market share increase instead of a blind market share desire but no profits - remember the initial web-boom joke "it's true that we are loosing money but we'll make up in volume"I do not aggree with price it must be 2 timese chipperfor a K110D price
6MP even lower noise (get a sensor from FujiOK, let's forget for the moment the entire K10D frenzy and let's
dream about the future
1. Should K200D have:
a) 6 megapixels, even lower noise, other features (see below);
b) 8 megapixels, same/higher noise;
c) 10 megapixels, more noise.
4AA no SSM, like now is perfect2. K200D battery + SSM support:
a) LiIon + SSM
b) 4 AA, no SSM
c) 6 AA + SSM
-- thus size the same, perhaps even smaller if they can3. K200D size + weight (will be linked to 2. battery!)
a) smaller/lighter than K100D (LiIon)
b) similar K100D (4 AA or LiIon)
c) similar K10D or bigger (6 AA or LiIon)
oooo most desireable new feature4. Most desirable new feature:
a) electronic preview on LCD with extra CCD (see Olimpus)
b) movie mode (800x600x30fps ?) and 'direct preview' with that mode
(during which optical viewfinder will be disabled)
c) other (describe).
Actually I had that in mind when I created the question - also please note:6MP even lower noise (get a sensor from Fuji1. Should K200D have:
...), better dynamic
range
That doesn't seem possible - 100% coverage is max, bigger magnification goes to lower brightness - even Canon 1Ds MkII (7000$) only has 0.7x and that one has 2.25 times more light to work with (1.5x * 1.5x); it might remain as a desire for a full-frame K1Doooo most desireable new feature
1. brighter OVF
That's something you can bet on3. get the dust thingy too
That will go great with my suggestion of 'direct view' and movie modenow some SF (science fiction) wishes, or what would be nice but
will never happen in this range or outright impossible
6. flip out LCD screen (like prosumers, specifically KM A200/A2)
Bigger buffer, faster bufferb) 8 megapixels, same/higher noise;
a) LiIon + SSM
b) similar K100D (4 AA or LiIon)
4. Most desirable new feature:
a)1. Should K200D have:
a) 6 megapixels, even lower noise, other features (see below);
b) 8 megapixels, same/higher noise;
c) 10 megapixels, more noise.
a)2. K200D battery + SSM support:
a) LiIon + SSM
b) 4 AA, no SSM
c) 6 AA + SSM
a)3. K200D size + weight (will be linked to 2. battery!)
a) smaller/lighter than K100D (LiIon)
b) similar K100D (4 AA or LiIon)
c) similar K10D or bigger (6 AA or LiIon)
c)4. Most desirable new feature:
a) electronic preview on LCD with extra CCD (see Olimpus)
b) movie mode (800x600x30fps ?) and 'direct preview' with that mode
(during which optical viewfinder will be disabled)
c) other (describe).
That makes a lot more sense than you believe - but for K1D - today I think that sensor-based IS will work better with some sensor crop - at least 1.1x or 1.2x, so it really makes sense to have at some point a 1.1x-1.2x crop 12 megapixel K1D (which will still have better noise than K10D) with Pentax IS and multiple A/D converters (like D200) and something like 6 fps shooting (and a 2 picture HDR mode that can be handheld with the 31mm limited at around 1/10s). However the price at the end of 2007 for body only can be at best 1499 US$While some of your dreamers have tried to change the laws of
physics ... there is a possibility that you're missing: 10MP, lower
noise. Without changing the laws of physics this requires a bigger
pixel and hence a bigger sensor: 1.3x crop fixes it. Within the
same back to reality constraint, a 1.3x crop sensor with a mere 8MP
would give lower noise than the 6MP cameras (so this is what to
vote for if you want ISO6400). Both would be more expensive sensors
than the 1.5x crop sensor (another law of physics remains unbroken)
which would be more suitable for a K1D (to challenge the EOS 1D Mk
II)...
OK, some people really dream a loong way into the future...
c) 7 inch LCD/plasma 1024 pixels, gps hook up, laser flash assist,
commander mode built in, mp4 player, 7.1 surround sound, MPEG5,
machine gun 8 fps, mega huge buffer (Gigabyte), wifi, USB3, PDA,
and capabilty to use 3 different types of media storage.
That's an interesting point - I believe that just by itself the pentaprism will only have like 0.2-0.3% better brightness than a pentamirror but will add some weight and price, normally you would want the entire system around it (with coverage and magnification and eyepoint) in order to really see the difference ...K100D with Penta Prism