What to do after taking the photo

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bernie Newman
  • Start date Start date
B

Bernie Newman

Guest
I used to visit this forum frequently, especially when I sought advice about selecting my first camera over a year ago. Some months later, I carped a little when Zing shut down and the way it was done. But I was away for a long time, and returned recently to an almost entirely unrecognizeable forum. Some good, some bad. I discovered this thing called pbase - wonder how long that's been around?

Anyway, one thing I like about this "new" forum is the way people exchange and discuss their photos. Never mind what I don't like about the new forum, there's PLENTY already being said here.

To me, what matters more than the preferred choice or feature of cameras, is what you do after you take the photos. For me, that is where the magic really starts, and where you can go farther than any darkroom ever could (I used to have one for years a lifetime ago). So, I wanted to share two favorite techniques that I have enjoyed playing with over my first year going digital.

Check them out at: http://www.pbase.com/bernien/galleries and feel free to offer your impressions.

One technique is to overlay different but almost the same poses. This can get a little contrived at times, but you can get some strange effects, that can sometimes tell a story or convey motion. The example is my daughter doing a few of her modern dance moves before the annual dance school performance.

Another technique I enjoy is to take a nicely exposed, but somewhat boring, set of photos and put them together in a way that the sum is more interesting than the individual parts. Although the two photos taken in Joshua Tree National Monument look years apart, they were actually taken within an hour of one another. I wanted to convey a sense of the timelessness of this place. The whole thing, like the other example, is just tricks with Photoshop 5.5.

Anyway, I'd enjoy the feedback, no flaming please.

PS: not one word of what camera I use. It doesn't matter.--Bernie
 
To me, what matters more than the preferred choice or feature of
cameras, is what you do after you take the photos. For me, that is
where the magic really starts, and where you can go farther than
any darkroom ever could (I used to have one for years a lifetime
ago). So, I wanted to share two favorite techniques that I have
enjoyed playing with over my first year going digital.
You put the lime in the coconut and shake it all up.

Fled
http://www.geocities.com/fleamusic
 
I used to visit this forum frequently, especially when I sought
advice about selecting my first camera over a year ago. Some months
later, I carped a little when Zing shut down and the way it was
done. But I was away for a long time, and returned recently to an
almost entirely unrecognizeable forum. Some good, some bad. I
discovered this thing called pbase - wonder how long that's been
around?

Anyway, one thing I like about this "new" forum is the way people
exchange and discuss their photos. Never mind what I don't like
about the new forum, there's PLENTY already being said here.

To me, what matters more than the preferred choice or feature of
cameras, is what you do after you take the photos. For me, that is
where the magic really starts, and where you can go farther than
any darkroom ever could (I used to have one for years a lifetime
ago). So, I wanted to share two favorite techniques that I have
enjoyed playing with over my first year going digital.

Check them out at: http://www.pbase.com/bernien/galleries and feel
free to offer your impressions.

One technique is to overlay different but almost the same poses.
This can get a little contrived at times, but you can get some
strange effects, that can sometimes tell a story or convey motion.
The example is my daughter doing a few of her modern dance moves
before the annual dance school performance.

Another technique I enjoy is to take a nicely exposed, but somewhat
boring, set of photos and put them together in a way that the sum
is more interesting than the individual parts. Although the two
photos taken in Joshua Tree National Monument look years apart,
they were actually taken within an hour of one another. I wanted to
convey a sense of the timelessness of this place. The whole thing,
like the other example, is just tricks with Photoshop 5.5.

Anyway, I'd enjoy the feedback, no flaming please.

PS: not one word of what camera I use. It doesn't matter.
--
Bernie
Hi Bernie and welcome back, you talk good sense and the Joshua pic was really good. At first I thought you had triplets when I first viewed the family pic. Anyway we have fun and learn a lot and the winds of change are blowing but that wont be all bad.

Jarhead
 
To me, what matters more than the preferred choice or feature of
cameras, is what you do after you take the photos. For me, that is
where the magic really starts, and where you can go farther than
any darkroom ever could (I used to have one for years a lifetime
ago). So, I wanted to share two favorite techniques that I have
enjoyed playing with over my first year going digital.
You put the lime in the coconut and shake it all up.

Fled
http://www.geocities.com/fleamusic
Are you sure you don't mean the vodka in the tomato juice?
 
He he he...

Fled
http://www.geocities.com/fleamusic
To me, what matters more than the preferred choice or feature of
cameras, is what you do after you take the photos. For me, that is
where the magic really starts, and where you can go farther than
any darkroom ever could (I used to have one for years a lifetime
ago). So, I wanted to share two favorite techniques that I have
enjoyed playing with over my first year going digital.
You put the lime in the coconut and shake it all up.

Fled
http://www.geocities.com/fleamusic
Are you sure you don't mean the vodka in the tomato juice?
 
Oh come on now, tell us what camera! Ha ha.. Cool stuff you did there. You're right, more interesting photos that we can all learn a little from is much more interesting. Keep them coming..
I used to visit this forum frequently, especially when I sought
advice about selecting my first camera over a year ago. Some months
later, I carped a little when Zing shut down and the way it was
done. But I was away for a long time, and returned recently to an
almost entirely unrecognizeable forum. Some good, some bad. I
discovered this thing called pbase - wonder how long that's been
around?

Anyway, one thing I like about this "new" forum is the way people
exchange and discuss their photos. Never mind what I don't like
about the new forum, there's PLENTY already being said here.

To me, what matters more than the preferred choice or feature of
cameras, is what you do after you take the photos. For me, that is
where the magic really starts, and where you can go farther than
any darkroom ever could (I used to have one for years a lifetime
ago). So, I wanted to share two favorite techniques that I have
enjoyed playing with over my first year going digital.

Check them out at: http://www.pbase.com/bernien/galleries and feel
free to offer your impressions.

One technique is to overlay different but almost the same poses.
This can get a little contrived at times, but you can get some
strange effects, that can sometimes tell a story or convey motion.
The example is my daughter doing a few of her modern dance moves
before the annual dance school performance.

Another technique I enjoy is to take a nicely exposed, but somewhat
boring, set of photos and put them together in a way that the sum
is more interesting than the individual parts. Although the two
photos taken in Joshua Tree National Monument look years apart,
they were actually taken within an hour of one another. I wanted to
convey a sense of the timelessness of this place. The whole thing,
like the other example, is just tricks with Photoshop 5.5.

Anyway, I'd enjoy the feedback, no flaming please.

PS: not one word of what camera I use. It doesn't matter.
--
Bernie
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top