Reading mode: Light Dark

B&H lists 70-200f4IS "In Stock"

Go to last post
ed rader said:
The 75-300 is junk.......any version of it.
Click to expand...
Mr. Ed,

Certainly, the lens to which you refer is not among Canon's best, but to conclude that it is "junk" could perhaps be overstating the case just a teeny weeny bit.

--
When I ask which Canon lenses are best,
people tell me to 'go to L.'
 
But you need to consider that it is f2.8 after all. So, paying only 400-500 more for that over the f4 IS is a steal (relatively).
 
But what I heard is that the IQ of 70-300 IS is a lot better than the old 75-300.
 
I don't really think the 24-105L is overpriced. It is about the same price as 24-70L. Granted that the 24-70L is f2.8 vs 24-105 as f4 but 24-105 has better range and IS. So, I think it is fair.
 
where did you get that from?

ed rader

--



'One often has mixed feelings about relatives, but few people could identify serious problems in their relationships with dogs.'

-- Anonymous
 
no text
 
or you could wait a year and save a hundred bucks or so....if you think that's "worth it"...:).

ed rader

--



'One often has mixed feelings about relatives, but few people could identify serious problems in their relationships with dogs.'

-- Anonymous
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top