75%??? Faster??? More accurate??? I don't know what type of photography you do nor the camera you use so I can't dispute your statement.
Agree but most tools dictate how they are used: try using a hammer on a screw for instance.
So thinking things through is bad (as in no exit strategy) and deciding is worse (as in I like digital photography).
Wow! And here's me thinking that thinking carefully about what I'm going to write, doing a rough list of ideas and then a sequence, more thought and a rough draft in my head (using my brain - as you suggested) and then typing it and making a few minor revisions was a good thing. Mostly because anything I keep changing my mind about isn't fit for me to write and make money from. people who buy books often do so because they get a good guide to things, rather than a wide ranging load of waffle covering every thing from don't, do, never and always on the same item.
It's not the typewriters that is bad it is the belief that ANY person has the ability to 'perfect' his/her thoughts so well that they NEVER need to be revisited again.
It's never rude to point out a flaw in someone's thinking or vigously defend your civilization
No Stephen, the reason is a legacy one if you have $5K invested in glass you need to keep!
I don't drive I cycle, Leica owners don't have to be rich, I paid less for my Leica than your D70!!
It keeps giving me "timed out" messages...
Hmmm, though you "have a fully equipped digital studio for shooting small products". Unless "fully equipped" is a point and shoot, you must be even richer than a D70 owner.
Wealth is not necessarily related to the equipment you own, here in the UK you can buy a fully equipped studio and write some off against tax.
Non sequitur
Who knows? there may be more choice in 5 years, but all you need is some film and I'd bet there'll be some about. But I tend to live for today keep one eye on the future and adapt to survive.
Who knows? I live for today
Who knows? I live for today
A convenient way of dismissing questions for which you have no answers. But it characterizes your arguments much more than mine.
No sir. You live in the past. "I'll pity him whist using my $500 25 year old Leica."
Not at all but seeing as I have about 4-5 years of free film I was given, the rough cost to me for film over the next few years $0
I live very much in the here and now hence why my company invests millions in new equipment
I agree, at least I hope so, but what does that have to do with speed of focus?
Hmmm, is that a Leica thing?
Are you serious? If so, then maybe your cameras are haunted. I think there's allot of this sort of thing that goes on, because I often hear about "ghost images" with certain lenses or cameras. Perhaps you took too many of these "ghost images" with your gear, once, and now they're infected. I guess if you like the pictures they take, then you might as well leave things be. Still, it's kind of weird. If you're affiliated with a church or religion, you might want to check with them (if you haven't already) to be sure you're not blaspheming by allowing the spirits to stay in your cameras or by enjoying their work.
