Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have few versions and mirroring was my initial intent, but I just didn't like the way it was turning, so dumped it. Sun was going down behind me fast and I only had few minutes. If I had more time maybe I would put something like leaves floating down, but I didn't. Thank you for the input, really appreciate it!Very nice photos. On the first one zoom out and catch the mirror
image to get the impact of the shot. It is still a beautiful photo.
Beautiful colors on all of the, but i fell in love with the one of
the Z
Dennis, although it was obvious overstatement, surprisingly it still feels good. I have to think about that, now… LOL… Thanks for kind words!--At Last! Someone with a Sony showing they can use it> .Others Take
Note.....Excellent shots, Lovely Fall colors..Thanks for showing.
MrScary (DennisR)
Swansea, Wales. UK
http://www.pbase.com/dennisr
http://community.webshots.com/user/mrscarecrow
http://digiden.photoshare.co.nz
Thank you for kind words. Now on this 4th one:Really great pics! You are an inspiration for me. I presume the
originals were really good right out of the camera and then you
made them even better with just the right touch of PP.
The exif indicates a focal length of 16mm on 4th one. What lens
were you using? The distortion on the edges is really something,
especially when photographing trees. The entire house on the left
appears slanted and the trees in front of it are growing sideways.
I don't seem to recall anything that extreme with my Sigma 17-70
even when shooting at 17mm.
I tried different ways to do this and neither one looked really to my liking. I'll try your suggestion, thanks!Hi Papasha,
I love the colors on your pics. Esspecially No 2. Beautiful shot!
On No 1. I would remove the branches entering the bottom right
corner... I'm not sure about the leaf in the bottom left either. I
think I would remove it as well, but it's just my personal opinion.
I noticed when there are many details in the picture, once shrunk, you almost need to actually blur the resulting picture, as it gets too busy with details. You are right.No 3. looks oversharpened to me. It's probably because of the size
reduction, but it's actually painful for the eyes ;-)
that was KM 11-18 at 11 mm. House is on the steep hill and I additionally heavily tilted the camera to get the tops of trees in. House became completely weird, but I decided still to keep it.On No 4. the croocked house looks odd.The loss of sharpness in the
corners (esspecially visible on the left side) is also very
strong.. What lens did you use for it?
Just the opposite. Thanks again!I hope you don't mind my comments!
Hi, Papasha - great pics, all (although the one with the heavily
tilted house is quite bizarre!). I've been moving closer to an edge
and/or the 7D's sensor, I wanted more resolution. Having a 7D and
- what with the autumn foliage and the shortcomings of my skills
large hands, I didn't want to "downgrade" to the A100 - I wanted to
move all the way to a D2X (S or not) ... and I still might, at some
point, depending on what Sony does. But your pics and David K.'s
discussions on the resolving power of the A100 at lower ISO's
(which is how I usually shoot) helped turn the tide, and I ordered
an A100 yesterday. At $750 it's less than I'd pay for a good lens,
and for now it saves me lots - the $$ I'd shell out for a D2X and
good lenses (to Nikon fans - and I love their cameras, lenses,
software, and photographic pov and excellence - I'm not saying the
A100 is anywhere near the D2X's league!); now about that grip ...
Rich