I'd be curious as to how the ER knows that the person is telling the truth.
My son is a paramedic, my wife worked at the local hospital for 20 years, and her sister works at the ER here. I'll have to ask them what their experience has been and whether or not they question patients and somehow log or enter that sort of data anywhere.
Is it possible that the statistic is for "injuries requiring an ER visit" yet is based on data submitted by the sanctioning bodies for organized sports?
How does the ER establish how many hours of participation that person had made up to the point of the injury? How do they log the hours of participation by OTHER skateboarders who were not injured? I really find it hard to believe that the typical group of skateboarders is logging all of this data so that when someone gets hurt they can present it to the ER so that these statistics could be compiled.
I can just see it:
"Hey, our buddy here broke his wrist just now illegally skating while trespassing on private property, but here's our log sheet showing how many hours we all have participated in the sport since the last reportable injury occurred. We just wanted to be sure that your database was kept complete even though we realize that this implicates us all in our last few months of trespassing...."
Yeah, right
I am not disputing your claim, but I'd like to see the source and check out how it is that they arrived at their statistics. Data to support claims like this would be extremely difficult to compile in a uniform and accurate way.
So far as I know, people presenting at the ER are not required to give all of the details of how they received an injury. However, insurance claims and the like would probably require that some explanation be given and I suspect that people tend to lie so that the injury will be covered instead of admitting that they were participating in an illegal activity at the time which would almost certainly NOT be covered by their insurance.
It seems like what we really want to see is a statistic that shows the "injuries per man-hour of participation in uncontrolled street-skating by people not wearing protective gear". And then compare that stat to one for skateboarders who are wearing protective gear and participating in sanctioned skateboard events.
Then we could compare both of those figures against the injury rates for people participating in sanctioned football, basketball, and baseball.
I'm certainly not saying that those other sports are safer. It could very well be that the safest of those we've mentioned would be the sanctioned skateboard events. But I suspect that if we had data broken down to show the injury rates for people not wearing proper gear and skateboarding NOT in sanctioned events, the figures for that group would certainly be worse. I'm not sure how it would stack up against the organized team sports, though.
Believe me, I'm no fan of most organized sports and I have zero interest in making them appear to be any safer than skateboarding.
I'm just pointing out that you need to be careful about simply accepting statistics. Often, the things being measured are not what you think they are, or the way things are compared is unfair or illogical.
I think statistics based on numbers of ER visits would almost certainly be skewed horribly due to the lack of recordkeeping and lack of truth in disclosing the causes of such injuries. Whereas the organized sports would not get away with any fraud and would have better stats due to the diligent recordkeeping required.
And no matter what, it'd be pretty hard to draw any meaningful conclusions from any of it. This kind of thing is not trivial to analyze for so many reasons.
So beware of these "statistics". This one, in particular, smells very fishy to me.
--
Jim H.