Poll: Would you miss the K10D pop-up flash

dotnik

Veteran Member
Messages
5,565
Reaction score
1
Location
DK
I don't know how much it costs to manufacture but if it was not there then I would think that it should be possible for Pentax to improve other areas in order to aim the K10D directly at pro users in terms of performance at almost the same price.

Don't get me wrong. I think Pentax did right aiming the K10D at advanced users because no one expected the K10D to be offered at such a competitive price and that leaves Pentax plenty of room to launch a pro spec'ed K1D and still be competitive. (without internal flash of course)
--
.......
Have a nice day (a picture says more than 1000 words)
Jim

Inspiration Challenge - in depth feedback guaranteed

'Don't overestimate technology - nothing is knowledgefree'

 
I never use the popup flash, but having had a flash die on me mid shoot, and not having a backup, it was nice to know that if worst came to worst i could use the internal flash, i can also use it to trigger slave flashes, etc.

Why not have one.
--
Not long now till i get a special K

Info thread for new Pentax SLR users:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=19455961

GMT +9.5
 
Depends on what kind of improvement, and how much? For the same price, I don't mind to trade the built-in flash for magnesium alloy body. But at the same time, I do use built-in flash for daylight fill-flash so I don't have to carry a shoe flash. Some people still think pro body must not have a built-in flash, but I couldn't care less.
--
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
 
i dont know why not having a built-in flash is considered a 'pro' feature... it comes in handy sometimes and i'll miss it if they do take it out :)
 
i dont know why not having a built-in flash is considered a 'pro'
feature... it comes in handy sometimes and i'll miss it if they do
take it out :)
It goes way back when Minolta released their last pro model, the '9', which was the 1st pro body with built-in flash, according to some. Back then, none of the Canon or Nikon pro film SLR had built-in flash, and that's how people assumed pro body mustn't have it. But I guess the DSLRs have changed everything. Basically any Canon or Nikon DSLRs have been used for money making these days people are okay with built-in flash.
--
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
 
Then I would miss it if it was not included.
I don't know how much it costs to manufacture but if it was not
there then I would think that it should be possible for Pentax to
improve other areas in order to aim the K10D directly at pro users
in terms of performance at almost the same price.
It's a shame they don't make a usable flash onboard.

I have had no success with it where it would be most useful, in daylight fill, and little success in low light.

Just a little more work could produce a useful 2 stage flash like the olympus E300 and Panasonic L1, which has an intermediate bounce position and enough grunt to actually illuminate the subject :-)

Regards

Trevor Ginaus

http://trevorg.smugmug.com
 
[apparently "no" is not a sensible subject according to the forum software!]

I can't recall ever using a pop-up flash on any camera I've ever owned, SLR or otherwise. When I recently bought an Olympus E-1[see note] I didn't even notice it had no flash until I was asked about it when showing it to a friend.

Note: The E-1 was cheap, I wanted a sealed camera, the K10D hadn't been announced. No regrets though, it's a nice camera.

--
John Bean

PAW Week 40:
http://waterfoot.smugmug.com/gallery/1082841/3/100679082/Large



Index page: http://waterfoot.smugmug.com
Latest walkabout (4 April): http://waterfoot.smugmug.com/gallery/1348582
 
Yes, I think I would. I don't have an external flash at this point in time so an onboard flash is better than no flash at all.
--
Gazza
http://www.pbase.com/gvrb



Smokey: October 1984 - 15 February 2005
'You only stop learning when you stop breathing'

GMT +13
 
Wim

--
Belgium, GMT+1

 
I agree completely - I would use onboard flash far more if I could bounce it, but seldom use "direct" onboard - horrible flattening effect IMO. And I hate fill flash. In the dpreview LC1 review, there are two telling pics, with direct and bounce flash. So much more modelling and atmosphere in the latter.

As a very very occasional and reluctant flash user, it is not worth the trouble of carrying a separate flash unit, keeping track of rechargeable batteries etc.

RP
 
Most of the time no. But there are times I find myself in a situation needing fill in flash. The pop up is incredibly handy for that.
--
Rosco
Terminal Stage LBA
http://www.pbase.com/roscot
 
I've used the built in flash for less than one in every thousand shots.

For my first 17 years with SLRs I didn't have built in flash.

I could live without it.

With all this clamour for pentax to make a "pro" body ... cameras like Canons 1D series and Nikons D2 series don't have builtin flash.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top