New LX2 user -- first impressions

greencastle1

Member
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Location
Greencastle, IN, US
Hi all,

I've been using a DSLR (first Olympus E300 then E1 -- unbelievable bargain these days, I doubt I'll ever own a better camera) for a while, but like many here wanted something smaller to carry around all the time. Was tempted by the LX1 last year, but gave in to the temptation to the LX2 this year. Have only had it for two days, so not much to report yet. Three initial impressions.

First, I'm really impressed with the metering and colors. Very nice camera, quick (even shooting raw, my e300 wasn't much faster processing raw shots) takes great shots.

Second, the much discussed issue regarding the blurring of low-contrast detail seems like the real deal. I find myself taking close ups of backlit subjects fairly frequently, I like the way the light becomes the subject of the picture as much as the nominal subject. So here's an example where (I think anyway) it's easy to see the fall-off in detail in low contrast areas -- shadows right next to in focus and lighted areas. The exposure is fine for the shadow areas (again, the camera does a good job at this as far as I can tell so far), but the detail really takes a nose dive. Here's the original photo resized for the web:



And here's a 100% crop showing shadow areas next to in focus areas:



The second thing I see so far is that, to put it politely, the bokeh going to take some getting used to. Again, I do a fair number of close up shots, and have really come to love the surreal background effects possible with a DSLRs, a good lens, and small aperatures. First impressions are that I'm not going to be tempted to aim for those kinds of shots with the LX2. Nice lens, but I'm not impressed with the bokeh thus far. Perhaps I just haven't found out how to play to its strengths yet, I don't know. Here's an example resized for the web:



There are a few more examples at http://www.flickr.com/photos/afrjc/ and these include a couple more 100% crops.

All photos shot raw, converted to dng, unapologetically post processed in Lightroom with wildly varying settings, then converted to jpg and resized.

Overall, nit picking aside, I'm enjoying the camera so far and look forward to getting to know it better. No regrets yet, should be a fun carry around camera and I imagine it won't take long to accumulate keeper shots that I would have missed entirely without it.

r
 
I would not ecpect the LX2 to give good bokeh.

--
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida
D Two XS
Leica M7
 
Thank you for the excellent feedback. I am considering to buy a D-Lux 3 or a LX2 and I would appreciate a decent macro experience with this camera which unfortunately is one of the shortcomings of this gem. It can not go to high magnifications, it does not have a special bokeh and the sudden loss of details in shadow areas.

Since I think you are interested in closeups or macros, could you recommend a compacvt camera with decent macro performance? (I have so far a list consisting of Canon S3 IS and A620/640 and Ricoh R5 that I will check)
--
 
Unfortunately I don't have any current info on compacts and macros. Nikon used to be highly reputed for this, don't know about their current line. Canon is probably a good bet. I used to have a Sony f88 and loved it for macro -- swivel lens that would focus down to touching the lens. (Then it went caput, end of that love affair.) Don't know about Sony's offerings these days. Good luck!

r
 
Nikon has the 4500 an a couple more which are still the best but are really outdated and possibly not on sale. So I am in my quest to find the best macro performer yet.

Thank you anyway. And have a great shootin' with the LX2. It's a little gem of a camera.
--
 
I really like this camera for its macro capability. The A610 is the predecessor to the A620/40. The vari-angle LCD makes for infinite possibilities.

-- Kate

Violets, 1-2" high:



Rose:



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

...Make you the world a bit better or more beautiful because you have lived in it.
-- Edward W. Bok
 
Yes, thanks for sharing indeed. I am inclining to get Canon A620 due to that sviwel LCD (and smaller size with bigger sensor compared to S3 IS). Anyway S3IS with more features can do it as well since it has a small sensor (1/2.5) but unspoiled with the pixel race (6 mp only). I also plan to get a Raynox 250 macro filter. Anyway I have mixed feelings for Ricoh R5 which is supposed to do the best macro. I don't know if it can get addons.

I don't know. Maybe I need to open another tread in a suitable forum to ask for suggestions.
 
xn3ct wrote:
(snip)
I don't know. Maybe I need to open another tread in a suitable
forum to ask for suggestions.
----
Yes, I think you should. But my 2 cents on the A620. I chose the A610 over the 620 as it has less megapixels on the same sensor. Therefore, cleaner images. Most other features are the same. And, yes, the swivel is just great.

--
Thanks.

-- Kate

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

...Make you the world a bit better or more beautiful because you have lived in it.
-- Edward W. Bok
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top