3 photos of flowers...

Nice shots mate. good angles.in the first shot the lighting isn't great. A overcast day it looks like which isn't ideal. The white flower seems quite grey. If you use auto settings with such a dominate white in shot the camera will think it needs adjusting and make it more grey(mid range)

to compensate set ur EV value up a stop. This may seem that it will be to bright but when the camera tries to grey the shot it will bring it down to the original and correct colour.

Also flowers that are wiltering a bit don't look that great. (exceptions)I know it's not always easy. But good shots!
 
The 2nd one is my favorite of the three: nice colour and lighting.. the first is nicely focused but underexposed IMO. A little fill lighting and/or contrast in post-production may help that first image look even better. Google's picasa software is great for these minor tweaks.
--
Regards,
Ashour
 
Hi Greg,

Don’t think I’m dumping on you, because that is not my intention. I think these are pretty good seeing that you just got your camera. Flower shots can be rather boring. You will see a lot of flower pictures that are nothing more than a picture of a flower, with the flower set dead center in the picture. This might be fine to identify the flower in an encyclopedia, but it doesn’t make a very interesting picture, unless there is something really unusual about the flower; maybe the color, or the shape, or a bee, bug, etc sitting on it. The picture has to have a reason for the viewer to view it, and capture their interest.

I like the first one for the subtle colors, and I think it is the best of the three. The composition could be better, the flower is dead center in the frame, remember the rule of thirds. I would also like to see a little more texture in the petals, so maybe the lighting or the exposure, or both, could be a little better.

The composition is better on the second picture, although your DOF didn’t get the entire flower in focus. I get the feeling that the leaves were the actual focal point in this photo. The leaves are very sharp. I would rather have the entire flower in focus than the leaves.

In the third photo, the flower in the lower right looks like it is starting to wilt, the colors have begun to fade and the flower is not all that attractive any more. Also the flower is outside the DOF and its softness I think distracts from the picture. I would have cropped the picture to something more like this.



Morris offered me some very good advice when I displayed some pictures of flowers, try some different angles. So I went from this



to this





and then the sprinklers came on and I went out when they shut off and the flowers were all wet and I came up with these, again using Morris’ suggestion to try different angles than just straight-on flower shots.





Some water droplets on the flowers adds highlights, and gives them a fresh dewy look, even in the late afternoon. I have a friend who owns a wholesale florist shop and he takes thousands of flower photos. He taught me to use a spray bottle and mist some water on to the flower to achieve that fresh dewy look. Another trick is to use the flash, the one on the camera will usually do just fine; this will darken the background and thereby highlight the flower.

--
Brooks

http://www.bmiddleton.smugmug.com

I daresay one profits more by the mistakes one makes off one's own bat than by doing the right thing on somebody's else advice.
— W. Somerset Maugham
 
Brooks...

What on earth did you shoot those with.... man... that last one is sharp

Thanks
T
--
D50, 18-55mm Kit lens, Nikkor 70-300D ED, Tamron 90mm, 80-200 AF-D, SB-800
Remember: The Immortal words of Socrates: 'I Drank what?'
 
I really like the first flower. I see how some might see it as underexposed, but on my monitor, it looks like that is just the right point to give you good definition and textures in the petals that would be lost if you the exposure was any brighter. i would crop it differently, and since the background adds little except darkness for contrast, I might crop it right down to the flower alone.

The 2nd one is also nice, but I'd have shot the flowers in the 3rd one individually, because I do not see them interacting iwth each other in the group shot.

I would urge caution with fill-flash, because it can overwhelm the flower and rob the image of subtlety, as I think it does in some of BrookP's shots. Your shots look like they're done with natural light, as I prefer it.
--
D Brown in St. Louis
http://www.pbase.com/debunix
http://www.flickr.com/photos/debunix
 
Glad you like it, I find the background a bit distracting but I like the way the water dropletrs came out. That shot was at 6:46pm on May 30th and I wasn't sure I was going to get anything that late in the afternoon on the North side of the house.
D50, Nikon 50mm F/1.8 with a cheap Quantaray close-up filter (a #2 I think).

Exposure Mode: Aperture Priority, White Balance: Auto, Metering Mode: Spot, AF Mode: AF-S, 1/60 sec - F/11, Flash Sync Mode: Front Curtain, Auto Flash Mode: Built-in TTL, ISO 200
--
Brooks

http://www.bmiddleton.smugmug.com

I daresay one profits more by the mistakes one makes off one's own bat than by doing the right thing on somebody's else advice.
— W. Somerset Maugham
 
I'm glad others are posting some flower shots!

Keep up the good work with the D70's. Alot of people won't take as good as shot even if they have had the camera a year. Good job and keep shooting.









James Dean
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top