T
Terry Thorn
Guest
It didn't take long at all, Daniella, and it gave me more insight to what you've been doing. You been "defending" the C700 by knocking the C2100 almost from the time you first joined the forum. You've been knocking IS on the 2100 quite vigorously making it seem that most anybody can get the same results on the C700 handheld at slow shutter speeds that you can which isn't the case at all and I feel you're misleading people by doing that. You've even tried to assert that the IS could cause blurry handheld images. It's noteworthy that you'll happily point someone to a review of the 2100 if it contains a negative point but you admonish a review that contains a negative point about the C700 preferring instead to have people believe you instead. That's the double standard again. Another example is your near constant harping about how existing light shots look yellow on the 2100 because it doesn't have the C700's manual white balance and you say it takes a "miracle" in PhotoShop to remove it. But, in order to increase the C700's shutter speed in order to get it high enough for NORMAL people to take sharp handheld shots, you suggest increasing the ISO to 800 which, of course, raises the grain and noise in the image which, you say, can be removed later with NO "miracle". Also, from reading your messages, it appears that, at times, you can type with perfect clarity, grammar, and spelling and then there are times where your words are quite the opposite. It's as if you're two entirely different people.
